Men in women's bathrooms

[HappyJoy]

As for Polygamy being legalized...I suppose it is possible someday and why wouldn't an insurance company cover all spouses? They cover all children.

Uh....cost.

You're saying an insurance company won't insure someone (assuming they are healthy) and take their money because of cost?

No you illiterate moron - I'm saying businesses won't pay insurance companies to cover the healthcare policies of 14 spouses for a single employee. It's not worth it to the business. No one person is worth a salary, vacation time, and healthcare for them, 14 spouses, and God knows how many children.

You lefties are so astoundingly stupid that you think healthcare is something mandatory. It is a perk businesses offer to attract talent (plenty of businesses don't offer any health insurance). But that perk must be less than the worth of that position/employee or it ceases to make economic sense for the business.

The question was about insurance companies, dingleberry.

 

[P@triot]

As for Polygamy being legalized...I suppose it is possible someday and why wouldn't an insurance company cover all spouses? They cover all children.

Uh....cost.

You're saying an insurance company won't insure someone (assuming they are healthy) and take their money because of cost?

No you illiterate moron - I'm saying businesses won't pay insurance companies to cover the healthcare policies of 14 spouses for a single employee. It's not worth it to the business. No one person is worth a salary, vacation time, and healthcare for them, 14 spouses, and God knows how many children.

You lefties are so astoundingly stupid that you think healthcare is something mandatory. It is a perk businesses offer to attract talent (plenty of businesses don't offer any health insurance). But that perk must be less than the worth of that position/employee or it ceases to make economic sense for the business.

The question was about insurance companies, dingleberry.

No it wasn't. You started your post out with "So you're saying". Verbatim. And that is not what I was saying. Time and time again in this thread you've failed to follow along. You're reading comprehension is atrocious.

Now...if you have a question about insurance companies - ask it. But don't attribute your question to me by saying "so you're saying". I was clearly talking about businesses and healthcare for their employees.

 

[mamooth]

Yes folks...even though it is indisputable fact

Wetting yourself and running again, I see. The topic was your refusal to back up your crazy claim that "You assholes adamantly declared that the polar ice-cap would be completely melted by 2014 unless we implemented your fascist totalitarian government." You made up a load of crap, got called on it, and everyone sees it.

that the polar ice-cap expanded 60% (over 900,000 sq. miles) in 2014, mammaries here is calling it a "conspiracy theory".

No, I never called that a conspiracy theory. Are you going for a record in the number of lies told in one post?

I am pointing out that you're lying-by-cherrypicking by claiming that a one-year recovery from a record-low meant global warming was a hoax. And you're lying-by-omission by leaving out the fact that ice levels crashed down again in 2015, 2016 and 2017.

Greenland just broke the record for the coldest July day ever recorded in the Northern Hemisphere at -33C.

So?

Greenland ice sheet ‘summit’ plunged to record low July temperature. So what?
---
Much more often than not, Greenland has been unusually warm.

Earlier this year, Greenland logged its highest June and April temperatures ever recorded. These records were established in Southwest Greenland.
---

Those who aren't retards know that, as the world warms, both new warm records and new cold records will continue to be set, but that the new warm records will outnumber new cold records more and more. And that's exactly what's been happening. The world has been reacting exactly as science predicted.

You need to understand that you're kind of a slow child, and totally misinformed, and that you have no business trying to be in a discussion with the adults on any topic.

 

[HappyJoy]

As for Polygamy being legalized...I suppose it is possible someday and why wouldn't an insurance company cover all spouses? They cover all children.

Uh....cost.

You're saying an insurance company won't insure someone (assuming they are healthy) and take their money because of cost?

No you illiterate moron - I'm saying businesses won't pay insurance companies to cover the healthcare policies of 14 spouses for a single employee. It's not worth it to the business. No one person is worth a salary, vacation time, and healthcare for them, 14 spouses, and God knows how many children.

You lefties are so astoundingly stupid that you think healthcare is something mandatory. It is a perk businesses offer to attract talent (plenty of businesses don't offer any health insurance). But that perk must be less than the worth of that position/employee or it ceases to make economic sense for the business.

The question was about insurance companies, dingleberry.

No it wasn't. You started your post out with "So you're saying". Verbatim. And that is not what I was saying. Time and time again in this thread you've failed to follow along. You're reading comprehension is atrocious.

Now...if you have a question about insurance companies - ask it. But don't attribute your question to me by saying "so you're saying". I was clearly talking about businesses and healthcare for their employees.

Time and time again? You're beyond hope.

The question you answered was about insurance companies.

 

[Rustic]

Yes folks...even though it is indisputable fact

Wetting yourself and running again, I see. The topic was your refusal to back up your crazy claim that "You assholes adamantly declared that the polar ice-cap would be completely melted by 2014 unless we implemented your fascist totalitarian government." You made up a load of crap, got called on it, and everyone sees it.

that the polar ice-cap expanded 60% (over 900,000 sq. miles) in 2014, mammaries here is calling it a "conspiracy theory".

No, I never called that a conspiracy theory. Are you going for a record in the number of lies told in one post?

I am pointing out that you're lying-by-cherrypicking by claiming that a one-year recovery from a record-low meant global warming was a hoax. And you're lying-by-omission by leaving out the fact that ice levels crashed down again in 2015, 2016 and 2017.

Greenland just broke the record for the coldest July day ever recorded in the Northern Hemisphere at -33C.

So?

Greenland ice sheet ‘summit’ plunged to record low July temperature. So what?
---
Much more often than not, Greenland has been unusually warm.

Earlier this year, Greenland logged its highest June and April temperatures ever recorded. These records were established in Southwest Greenland.
---

Those who aren't retards know that, as the world warms, both new warm records and new cold records will continue to be set, but that the new warm records will outnumber new cold records more and more. And that's exactly what's been happening. The world has been reacting exactly as science predicted.

You need to understand that you're kind of a slow child, and totally misinformed, and that you have no business trying to be in a discussion with the adults on any topic.

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

 

[mamooth]

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

Yeah, the usual old whoppers from D'Aleo and Idso, in a new package.

Actual scientists don't publish their "studies" on conspiracy blogs, you know.

 

[Rustic]

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

Yeah, the usual old whoppers from D'Aleo and Idso, in a new package.

Actual scientists don't publish their "studies" on conspiracy blogs, you know.

I get it, you think polar bears are drowning...

 

[Seawytch]

As for Polygamy being legalized...I suppose it is possible someday and why wouldn't an insurance company cover all spouses? They cover all children.

Uh....cost.

Again, insurance companies don't limit the number of your children they insure, why should spouses be any different? Now where you can get into problems is with, oh, Social Security. Which spouse gets the survivor benefits? I guess they all could divide it equally.

Once we have a single payer healthcare system like the rest of the civilized world, it won't matter unless you're buying a supplement and I'm sure, if Polygamy is legal by that time, insurance companies will be tailoring a plan to meet the needs of the "Modern Polygamist Household".

 

[Seawytch]

And Rottweiler old pup, animals can't consent.

They can't consent to being owned either....but we own them.

They do consent to being owned by being dumb animals...they cannot, however, consent to a legal contract. Does this sort of thing really have to be explained to you? Should we warn the sheep in your area?

 

[HappyJoy]

And Rottweiler old pup, animals can't consent.

They can't consent to being owned either....but we own them.

They do consent to being owned by being dumb animals...they cannot, however, consent to a legal contract. Does this sort of thing really have to be explained to you? Should we warn the sheep in your area?

Sounds to me like patriot is making a pretty horrific argument that if we own animals we can also marry them. Not sure what that has to do with gay marriage and I disagree completely with his logic, but it is the logic of his argument even if he doesn't understand it.

 

[Kondor3]

So, have we decided yet, that allowing AquaLung to go into womens' bathrooms, "...eyeing little girls with bad intent..." is a bad thing?

Or have we slid so far down the slope of licentiousness and degeneracy that we think empowering sexual deviants and perverts in such matters is acceptable?

-----------------------

This is what happens, when you open the door a crack, at-law, with respect to the Gay Agenda... they push and push and push and take and take and take...

Until, finally, our wives and daughters are at-risk from these creeps.

Many of these scum are not "gay" per se, but they use the $hit-for-brains judicial interpretations stemming from Gay judicial activism, to do what they do.

Hopefully, a 5-4 SCOTUS (likely soon to be a 6-3 court, Ginsberg won't last much longer) can be of some service to the Republic by reversing some of the worst of this.

 

[mgh80]

Other than having security guards at every restroom, how would you prevent them from entering a women's restroom?

Uh...how have men been prevented for hundreds of years from entering the women's room? Did we have restrooms guards in the 1980's, genius?

So what you're saying is...we have a problem that already has been solved?

 

[Ame®icano]

Irrational fears is not science, son.

You're right. And mental illness is not science either. The mentally ill should not be dictating policy in society, sweetie.

Times, they are a changin'.

Is Being Transgender a Mental Disorder?

Anyway, like I said before, they are already using the bathroom of their choice on many occasions and were doing just fine.

Next thing you know, you're going to want to reclassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. I'm assuming you probably have an issue with gay men standing next to boys at the urinal.

Times may be changing, but truth hasn't. Just because the left politically pressures a group to relabel something doesn't mean it's true.

Homophobia is a mental disorder, it's 2017, embrace the rainbow.

Love how lefties use "current year" argument to make a point.

Let's try it, shall we?

Democrats in pre-civil was America: "It's 1850, embrace the slavery."
Socialists in pre-WWII Germany: "It's 1938, kill the Jews."

 

[Ame®icano]

Nothing to see here, everything is normal.



With alternative as this, the Islam in Sweden probably isn't such a bad idea.

 

[HappyJoy]

Irrational fears is not science, son.

You're right. And mental illness is not science either. The mentally ill should not be dictating policy in society, sweetie.

Times, they are a changin'.

Is Being Transgender a Mental Disorder?

Anyway, like I said before, they are already using the bathroom of their choice on many occasions and were doing just fine.

Next thing you know, you're going to want to reclassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. I'm assuming you probably have an issue with gay men standing next to boys at the urinal.

Times may be changing, but truth hasn't. Just because the left politically pressures a group to relabel something doesn't mean it's true.

Homophobia is a mental disorder, it's 2017, embrace the rainbow.

Love how lefties use "current year" argument to make a point.

Let's try it, shall we?

Democrats in pre-civil was America: "It's 1850, embrace the slavery."
Socialists in pre-WWII Germany: "It's 1938, kill the Jews."

That's it, rube, keep living in the past. It's 2017 and all those 'states rights' warriors are Republicans.

 

[Ame®icano]

You're right. And mental illness is not science either. The mentally ill should not be dictating policy in society, sweetie.

Times, they are a changin'.

Is Being Transgender a Mental Disorder?

Anyway, like I said before, they are already using the bathroom of their choice on many occasions and were doing just fine.

Next thing you know, you're going to want to reclassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. I'm assuming you probably have an issue with gay men standing next to boys at the urinal.

Times may be changing, but truth hasn't. Just because the left politically pressures a group to relabel something doesn't mean it's true.

Homophobia is a mental disorder, it's 2017, embrace the rainbow.

Love how lefties use "current year" argument to make a point.

Let's try it, shall we?

Democrats in pre-civil was America: "It's 1850, embrace the slavery."
Socialists in pre-WWII Germany: "It's 1938, kill the Jews."

That's it, rube, keep living in the past. It's 2017 and all those 'states rights' warriors are Republicans.

Just as any other leftie, you wish to change the history...

Nope, there was no Republican that was slave owner, they were all Democrats. Just as those who brought Jim Crow, segregation, lynching laws, KKK, eugenics, you name it. Every single evil in US history came from Democrats. Deal with it.

 

[HappyJoy]

Times, they are a changin'.

Is Being Transgender a Mental Disorder?

Anyway, like I said before, they are already using the bathroom of their choice on many occasions and were doing just fine.

Next thing you know, you're going to want to reclassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. I'm assuming you probably have an issue with gay men standing next to boys at the urinal.

Times may be changing, but truth hasn't. Just because the left politically pressures a group to relabel something doesn't mean it's true.

Homophobia is a mental disorder, it's 2017, embrace the rainbow.

Love how lefties use "current year" argument to make a point.

Let's try it, shall we?

Democrats in pre-civil was America: "It's 1850, embrace the slavery."
Socialists in pre-WWII Germany: "It's 1938, kill the Jews."

That's it, rube, keep living in the past. It's 2017 and all those 'states rights' warriors are Republicans.

Just as any other leftie, you wish to change the history...

Nope, there was no Republican that was slave owner, they were all Democrats. Just as those who brought Jim Crow, segregation, lynching laws, KKK, eugenics, you name it. Every single evil in US history came from Democrats. Deal with it.

They were all Christians too. But I'm referring to 2017 'states rights' warriors. Perhaps I was being too cryptic by stating the year 2017 in my post.

 

[Ame®icano]

Times may be changing, but truth hasn't. Just because the left politically pressures a group to relabel something doesn't mean it's true.

Homophobia is a mental disorder, it's 2017, embrace the rainbow.

Love how lefties use "current year" argument to make a point.

Let's try it, shall we?

Democrats in pre-civil was America: "It's 1850, embrace the slavery."
Socialists in pre-WWII Germany: "It's 1938, kill the Jews."

That's it, rube, keep living in the past. It's 2017 and all those 'states rights' warriors are Republicans.

Just as any other leftie, you wish to change the history...

Nope, there was no Republican that was slave owner, they were all Democrats. Just as those who brought Jim Crow, segregation, lynching laws, KKK, eugenics, you name it. Every single evil in US history came from Democrats. Deal with it.

They were all Christians too. But I'm referring to 2017 'states rights' warriors. Perhaps I was being too cryptic by stating the year 2017 in my post.

Sure, there is no reason for them to embrace the sickness that's coming from the left. Not in 1850s, not in 1930s, not in 2017.

Also, what is your problem with the "state rights"?

 

[HappyJoy]

Homophobia is a mental disorder, it's 2017, embrace the rainbow.

Love how lefties use "current year" argument to make a point.

Let's try it, shall we?

Democrats in pre-civil was America: "It's 1850, embrace the slavery."
Socialists in pre-WWII Germany: "It's 1938, kill the Jews."

That's it, rube, keep living in the past. It's 2017 and all those 'states rights' warriors are Republicans.

Just as any other leftie, you wish to change the history...

Nope, there was no Republican that was slave owner, they were all Democrats. Just as those who brought Jim Crow, segregation, lynching laws, KKK, eugenics, you name it. Every single evil in US history came from Democrats. Deal with it.

They were all Christians too. But I'm referring to 2017 'states rights' warriors. Perhaps I was being too cryptic by stating the year 2017 in my post.

Sure, there is no reason for them to embrace the sickness that's coming from the left. Not in 1850s, not in 1930s, not in 2017.

Also, what is your problem with the "state rights"?

I don't know, states rights and the rebel flag, popular in the South back in the day and popular now with Republicans. Just sayin'.

 

[Ame®icano]

Love how lefties use "current year" argument to make a point.

Let's try it, shall we?

Democrats in pre-civil was America: "It's 1850, embrace the slavery."
Socialists in pre-WWII Germany: "It's 1938, kill the Jews."

That's it, rube, keep living in the past. It's 2017 and all those 'states rights' warriors are Republicans.

Just as any other leftie, you wish to change the history...

Nope, there was no Republican that was slave owner, they were all Democrats. Just as those who brought Jim Crow, segregation, lynching laws, KKK, eugenics, you name it. Every single evil in US history came from Democrats. Deal with it.

They were all Christians too. But I'm referring to 2017 'states rights' warriors. Perhaps I was being too cryptic by stating the year 2017 in my post.

Sure, there is no reason for them to embrace the sickness that's coming from the left. Not in 1850s, not in 1930s, not in 2017.

Also, what is your problem with the "state rights"?

I don't know, states rights and the rebel flag, popular in the South back in the day and popular now with Republicans. Just sayin'.

State rights were always popular, ever since founding fathers put it in the tenth.

However, reasons for demanding respect of state rights have been changing over the years.

For instance, back then Democrats demanded state rights for a reason of slavery, it was so wrong that they had to be bitchslapped, badly.

Or when Democrats claimed state rights when they nullified federal law and tried to keep schools segregated back in 1950s.

In comparison with those, please explain what is wrong today's Republican claims of state rights?