Michael Avenatti: 3 More Women Were Paid ‘Hush Money’ For Relationships With Trump

I look forward to these other 3 women coming forward publicly.
Most of us have better things to do than pay attention to the constant character assassination you fuckers seem to think will win elections for you.

You're too busy listening to the character assassinations of Mueller, Rosenstein, et al.
Nope.
I don't pay attention because most of it is recycled from last year.
It just goes in one ear and out the other.

That won't fly. Mueller was still a good guy Republican a year ago.
Mueller is a worthless prick that enjoys abusing his authority.
He doesn't believe in following the law.
 
I look forward to these other 3 women coming forward publicly.
Most of us have better things to do than pay attention to the constant character assassination you fuckers seem to think will win elections for you.

You're too busy listening to the character assassinations of Mueller, Rosenstein, et al.
Nope.
I don't pay attention because most of it is recycled from last year.
It just goes in one ear and out the other.

That won't fly. Mueller was still a good guy Republican a year ago.
Mueller is a worthless prick that enjoys abusing his authority.
He doesn't believe in following the law.

You just say stupid stuff.
 
Most of us have better things to do than pay attention to the constant character assassination you fuckers seem to think will win elections for you.

You're too busy listening to the character assassinations of Mueller, Rosenstein, et al.
Nope.
I don't pay attention because most of it is recycled from last year.
It just goes in one ear and out the other.

That won't fly. Mueller was still a good guy Republican a year ago.
Mueller is a worthless prick that enjoys abusing his authority.
He doesn't believe in following the law.

You just say stupid stuff.
Accurate stuff.
You need to read up on Mueller.
He was specifically selected for his penchant for prosecutorial misconduct.
 
Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif. (AP) — Michael Avenatti, the attorney for porn actress Stormy Daniels, said Thursday that he now represents three additional women who he says had relationships with President Donald Trump and were paid “hush money” before the 2016 presidential election.

Avenatti disclosed the information at a community forum in West Hollywood, California, but he would not provide additional information.

Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

He said he was “not at liberty to share” the evidence because he didn’t have permission from his clients to disclose specifics. But Avenatti said the women, who contacted him months ago, were “paid hush money prior to the 2016 election.”

He called on Trump and his former longtime personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to come forward and disclose information about the women and their supposed relationships with Trump.

Michael Avenatti: 3 More Women Were Paid 'Hush Money' For Relationships With Trump

Very interesting. I suspect there are many more than three.





What I find funny is you clowns think that all you have to do is pile on more and more "evidence" that trump is a womanizing rich asshole. We already KNOW that you 'tard. We don't care.

We see that he lies to you every day, and you don't care.





Yes, just like obummer lied to you every day and you didn't care either. Funny that. Of course, trumps lies hurt him, and no one else. obummers lies hurt lots of people. And once again you didn't care about that either.

I keep appending a 'funny' to your ludicrous post, and you keep removing it. That's a little overly-sensitive, isn't it?
 
Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif. (AP) — Michael Avenatti, the attorney for porn actress Stormy Daniels, said Thursday that he now represents three additional women who he says had relationships with President Donald Trump and were paid “hush money” before the 2016 presidential election.

Avenatti disclosed the information at a community forum in West Hollywood, California, but he would not provide additional information.

Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

He said he was “not at liberty to share” the evidence because he didn’t have permission from his clients to disclose specifics. But Avenatti said the women, who contacted him months ago, were “paid hush money prior to the 2016 election.”

He called on Trump and his former longtime personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to come forward and disclose information about the women and their supposed relationships with Trump.

Michael Avenatti: 3 More Women Were Paid 'Hush Money' For Relationships With Trump

Very interesting. I suspect there are many more than three.





What I find funny is you clowns think that all you have to do is pile on more and more "evidence" that trump is a womanizing rich asshole. We already KNOW that you 'tard. We don't care.

We see that he lies to you every day, and you don't care.





Yes, just like obummer lied to you every day and you didn't care either. Funny that. Of course, trumps lies hurt him, and no one else. obummers lies hurt lots of people. And once again you didn't care about that either.

I keep appending a 'funny' to your ludicrous post, and you keep removing it. That's a little overly-sensitive, isn't it?






That's because instead of addressing the post you try and use a silly emoji as a response. Mainly because you're not clever enough to come up with a real one.
 
Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif. (AP) — Michael Avenatti, the attorney for porn actress Stormy Daniels, said Thursday that he now represents three additional women who he says had relationships with President Donald Trump and were paid “hush money” before the 2016 presidential election.

Avenatti disclosed the information at a community forum in West Hollywood, California, but he would not provide additional information.

Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

He said he was “not at liberty to share” the evidence because he didn’t have permission from his clients to disclose specifics. But Avenatti said the women, who contacted him months ago, were “paid hush money prior to the 2016 election.”

He called on Trump and his former longtime personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to come forward and disclose information about the women and their supposed relationships with Trump.

Michael Avenatti: 3 More Women Were Paid 'Hush Money' For Relationships With Trump

Very interesting. I suspect there are many more than three.





What I find funny is you clowns think that all you have to do is pile on more and more "evidence" that trump is a womanizing rich asshole. We already KNOW that you 'tard. We don't care.

We see that he lies to you every day, and you don't care.





Yes, just like obummer lied to you every day and you didn't care either. Funny that. Of course, trumps lies hurt him, and no one else. obummers lies hurt lots of people. And once again you didn't care about that either.

I keep appending a 'funny' to your ludicrous post, and you keep removing it. That's a little overly-sensitive, isn't it?






That's because instead of addressing the post you try and use a silly emoji as a response. Mainly because you're not clever enough to come up with a real one.

I'm not stupid enough to buy into your ridiculous false equivalence. A silly emoji is what that nonsense deserves.

Curiosity - do you remove 'funnies' when they are in response to a poster other than you?
 
What I find funny is you clowns think that all you have to do is pile on more and more "evidence" that trump is a womanizing rich asshole. We already KNOW that you 'tard. We don't care.

We see that he lies to you every day, and you don't care.





Yes, just like obummer lied to you every day and you didn't care either. Funny that. Of course, trumps lies hurt him, and no one else. obummers lies hurt lots of people. And once again you didn't care about that either.

I keep appending a 'funny' to your ludicrous post, and you keep removing it. That's a little overly-sensitive, isn't it?






That's because instead of addressing the post you try and use a silly emoji as a response. Mainly because you're not clever enough to come up with a real one.

I'm not stupid enough to buy into your ridiculous false equivalence. A silly emoji is what that nonsense deserves.

Curiosity - do you remove 'funnies' when they are in response to a poster other than you?





I remove funnies when the poster resorts to them instead of addressing the uncomfortable fact that they are wrong, and have no answer for it. If you can come up with a reasoned response then you can post your funny as well. Defend your assertion.
 
We see that he lies to you every day, and you don't care.





Yes, just like obummer lied to you every day and you didn't care either. Funny that. Of course, trumps lies hurt him, and no one else. obummers lies hurt lots of people. And once again you didn't care about that either.

I keep appending a 'funny' to your ludicrous post, and you keep removing it. That's a little overly-sensitive, isn't it?






That's because instead of addressing the post you try and use a silly emoji as a response. Mainly because you're not clever enough to come up with a real one.

I'm not stupid enough to buy into your ridiculous false equivalence. A silly emoji is what that nonsense deserves.

Curiosity - do you remove 'funnies' when they are in response to a poster other than you?





I remove funnies when the poster resorts to them instead of addressing the uncomfortable fact that they are wrong, and have no answer for it. If you can come up with a reasoned response then you can post your funny as well. Defend your assertion.

You assert empty bullshit like "obummer lied to you every day and you didn't care either. Funny that. Of course, trumps lies hurt him, and no one else. obummers lies hurt lots of people". There's no rational response to that, because it's neither a rational nor factual statement.

If it's not funny, it's sad.
 
Yes, just like obummer lied to you every day and you didn't care either. Funny that. Of course, trumps lies hurt him, and no one else. obummers lies hurt lots of people. And once again you didn't care about that either.

I keep appending a 'funny' to your ludicrous post, and you keep removing it. That's a little overly-sensitive, isn't it?






That's because instead of addressing the post you try and use a silly emoji as a response. Mainly because you're not clever enough to come up with a real one.

I'm not stupid enough to buy into your ridiculous false equivalence. A silly emoji is what that nonsense deserves.

Curiosity - do you remove 'funnies' when they are in response to a poster other than you?





I remove funnies when the poster resorts to them instead of addressing the uncomfortable fact that they are wrong, and have no answer for it. If you can come up with a reasoned response then you can post your funny as well. Defend your assertion.

You assert empty bullshit like "obummer lied to you every day and you didn't care either. Funny that. Of course, trumps lies hurt him, and no one else. obummers lies hurt lots of people". There's no rational response to that, because it's neither a rational nor factual statement.

If it's not funny, it's sad.







But obummer did lie to you. Or do you deny that fact?
 
This thread is about Michael Avenatti and 3 more Trump women - not Mueller, Obama, etc...





They are all intertwined. The hysterical attention you pay to trumps many indiscretions is only exceeded by your profound hypocrisy and silence as regards how you dealt with the obummer admin.
 
This thread is about Michael Avenatti and 3 more Trump women - not Mueller, Obama, etc...





They are all intertwined. The hysterical attention you pay to trumps many indiscretions is only exceeded by your profound hypocrisy and silence as regards how you dealt with the obummer admin.

They are only "intertwined" in the mind of someone trying to hijack this thread.
 
Where does Avenatti get his information? Leaked by the Mueller probe? It's an old trick. The thing of it is that paying off bimbos to keep their mouth shut about consensual relationships is legal, isn't it? Using government agencies and police and political activists to threaten women who were allegedly victims of sexual abuse (and rape) is illegal. Remember Hillary's "Bimbo Eruption Squad" that the media joked about? Remember democrat activist James Carvelle who threatened Paula Jones and held her up to public ridicule with remarks like "drag a $20 through a trailer park"? The media joked about it and let it happen because they liked Bill and Hillary. The Clinton's systematically threatened victims of Bill's peculiar sexual appetite for decades from Arkansas to the White House and the left turned it into a joke.
 
Really don't have time to think or worry about Trumps sex life, with the constant daily up down & over the top Other Things going on. looking forward to a smother less frantic government.
 
Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif. (AP) — Michael Avenatti, the attorney for porn actress Stormy Daniels, said Thursday that he now represents three additional women who he says had relationships with President Donald Trump and were paid “hush money” before the 2016 presidential election.

Avenatti disclosed the information at a community forum in West Hollywood, California, but he would not provide additional information.

Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

He said he was “not at liberty to share” the evidence because he didn’t have permission from his clients to disclose specifics. But Avenatti said the women, who contacted him months ago, were “paid hush money prior to the 2016 election.”

He called on Trump and his former longtime personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to come forward and disclose information about the women and their supposed relationships with Trump.

Michael Avenatti: 3 More Women Were Paid 'Hush Money' For Relationships With Trump

Very interesting. I suspect there are many more than three.

Not that this is illegal, not illegal to pay moneys to anyone also not illegal for married men to have affairs. You are just jealous because you cannot get laid and The Donald can.
FYI

That is not true Lucy

Adultery is illegal in certain States, running from a misdemeanor crime (like crossing the border illegally), to a Felony where three years in prison is the penalty....

Adultery is against the law, in New York State.

Although adultery is a misdemeanor in most of the states with laws against it, some — including Michigan and Wisconsin — categorize the offense as a felony. Punishments vary widely by state. In Maryland, the penalty is a paltry $10 fine. But in Massachusetts, an adulterer could face up to three years in jail.Apr 17, 2014

So yes, you and others can laugh it off.... but the President is a criminal if it is true....

man oh man, Trump ain't gonna have a dime left when and if Melania divorces him for adultery
do you think she cares or do you think Donald doesn't have a prenup?


seriously, she just wanted to be the last mrs trump, for the win.
Ahhhh, yes, now lets cut down and demean Melania time, is in order.... not that he's a low life.... always the woman's fault, it was Hillary's fault on Bill and now it is Melania being demeaned as well....

:rolleyes:
You talking justice is laughable... Now you talking politics is more believable, but justice and moral justice or care for Melania who is also your enemy for being married to your enemy ?? Uhhhhh no that's not in your mindset or your make up here..... Bawahawahawahahawahawa.... You people are so unhinged it's ridiculous.
 
Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif. (AP) — Michael Avenatti, the attorney for porn actress Stormy Daniels, said Thursday that he now represents three additional women who he says had relationships with President Donald Trump and were paid “hush money” before the 2016 presidential election.

Avenatti disclosed the information at a community forum in West Hollywood, California, but he would not provide additional information.

Asked if he had evidence that the women had relationships with Trump, Avenatti said: “Yes.”

He said he was “not at liberty to share” the evidence because he didn’t have permission from his clients to disclose specifics. But Avenatti said the women, who contacted him months ago, were “paid hush money prior to the 2016 election.”

He called on Trump and his former longtime personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to come forward and disclose information about the women and their supposed relationships with Trump.

Michael Avenatti: 3 More Women Were Paid 'Hush Money' For Relationships With Trump

Very interesting. I suspect there are many more than three.

Not that this is illegal, not illegal to pay moneys to anyone also not illegal for married men to have affairs. You are just jealous because you cannot get laid and The Donald can.
Ya gotta love it when the party of family values here defends adultery.
Whats worse is the party of immorality in certain sectors trying to act morally when it's politically convenient.. bawahawahawahahawahawa.... You can't make this crap up.

Not saying you are part of that immorality, but many like that Matt Lauer etc just amaze everyone in all of this stuff.
 
Could this be one of the women Michael Avenatti is representing?

A doorman claims Trump had a child out of wedlock with his housekeeper — and the National Enquirer paid him $30,000 to shut up.

In late 2015, Dino Sajudin, a former doorman at Trump Tower, told a reporter for American Media Inc. (or AMI for short, which publishes the National Enquirer among other gossip outlets) that Donald Trump had possibly fathered a child out of wedlock with an ex-employee in the late 1980s. He passed a lie detector test, AMI paid him $30,000 for the exclusive rights to his account, and then the company, whose president is good friends with President Trump, buried it.

Sajudin’s allegation of a $30,000 payoff to kill the story, reported first by the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow on Thursday, April 12, has since been corroborated in whole or in part by the Associated Press and the Washington Post. The Post’s Carol Leonnig spoke to Sajudin, who stood by his story and told her it “had to come out.”

In a statement, he elaborated, “I was instructed not to criticize President Trump’s former housekeeper due to a prior relationship she had with President Trump which produced a child.”

Much More: The Donald Trump "love child" payoff scandal, explained
 
I look forward to these other 3 women coming forward publicly.
Most of us have better things to do than pay attention to the constant character assassination you fuckers seem to think will win elections for you.

You're too busy listening to the character assassinations of Mueller, Rosenstein, et al.
Nope.
I don't pay attention because most of it is recycled from last year.
It just goes in one ear and out the other.
Of course it does — there’s nothing between your ears to prevent that.

Meanwhile, there may be as many as 5 women who were paid off to remain silent about affairs with trump.

The way rightards wailed about Bill Clinton, ya’d think think held the moral high ground on this issue.

Thanks, Crazy Donald, your party has now surrendered any moral high ground.

:dance:
 
When something starts out with "had posdibly " two thongs are certain. One, it isn't hoing to get any better and two, democrats will take it as already proved to be true.
 

Forum List

Back
Top