Michael Flynn played himself in court

[Skylar]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Buddy boy, you better remind Flynn about that, because he just told the judge otherwise. And guess what counts? LOl! You can rest assured, it won't be what you have to say about it, so dream on in your alternate universe.

I don't understand what the point of these elaborate webs of pseudo-legal nonsense that our resident conservatives are huffing lately.

Flynn's own lawyers, IN COURT, say that Flynn wasn't entrapped. And these silly conservatives ignore them entirely, making up their own imaginary narrative of made up gibberish that might as well begin with 'once upon a time'.

Honestly, what's the point of a 'legal' argument that has no application in the law nor is recognized in any court?

Self soothing? A rhetorical binky is the only thing I can think of.

 

[flacaltenn]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

 

[Asclepias]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

 

[Skylar]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well.

Incoherent conspiracy batshit backed by nothing.

Who says that Mueller threatened Flynn's son? Not Flynn. Not Flynn's lawyers. Not Flynn's son. Not the prosecutors. Not Mueller. Not the judge.

Just you...citing your imagination. Which isn't evidence of anything. And contradicting you....is Michael Flynn himself. Who says he is voluntarily accepting the plea deal and isn't being threatened.

Your entire argument is doubly irrational. As 1) It isn't based on evidence, but imagination. 2) You have to ignore actual evidence to do it.

Why would any rational person do *either*?

He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

The same special counsel that found that Vince Foster commited suicide? That special counsel?

You're wallowing in conspiracy batshit lik a pig in mud. And using your NEXT baseless conspiracy as justification for your LAST baseless conspiracy.

What is the point of your fantastically elaborate, wildly complicated and gloriously fact free silly little fantasy? As even you can't factually establish your bullshit.

 

[Leo123]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

When was Flynn considered a 'criminal?'

 

[Skylar]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

The court......and Michael Flynn's lawyers.

With Michael Flynn admitting that he knew it was a crime to lie to the federal investigators.

And yet our obsessive conspiracy theorists *still* ignore every word of it and start their own pseudo-legal fan fiction that might as well include killer robots from the future and vampires that sparkle for as little connection as they have to reality.

 

[Skylar]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

When was Flynn considered a 'criminal?'

When he commited a crime.

 

[flacaltenn]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

Not about "warning" him. Although if charges were even CONTEMPLATED, it should have been an OFFICIAL deposition so that TRANSCRIPTS and RECORDINGS would be available.

But instead a bigger question of WHY they were even trotting into the WHouse just days after the transition. Comey was asked that question yesterday and made up some bullshit excuse about the Logan Act.

Comey got LAUGHED at for that. The Logan act doesn't even APPLY to persons authorized to participate in foreign relations and affairs.. They had NO REASON to ambush him with intel acquired thru spying on an opposition political campaign. That's a LOT more important than whether he was "warned" or ambushed.

Before you continue to bait and troll, take a minute.. Give me a legitimate LEGAL reason for that ambush in the 1st days of the White House...

 

[Asclepias]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

When was Flynn considered a 'criminal?'

The day Drumpf appointed him. Why do you ask?

 

[Asclepias]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

Not about "warning" him. Although if charges were even CONTEMPLATED, it should have been an OFFICIAL deposition so that TRANSCRIPTS and RECORDINGS would be available.

But instead a bigger question of WHY they were even trotting into the WHouse just days after the transition. Comey was asked that question yesterday and made up some bullshit excuse about the Logan Act.

Comey got LAUGHED at for that. The Logan act doesn't even APPLY to persons authorized to participate in foreign relations and affairs.. They had NO REASON to ambush him with intel acquired thru spying on an opposition political campaign. That's a LOT more important than whether he was "warned" or ambushed.

Before you continue to bait and troll, take a minute.. Give me a legitimate LEGAL reason for that ambush in the 1st days of the White House...

Who told you it should have been an official deposition? Law enforcement doesnt always find out youre a criminal by deposition. Sometimes they work on hunches.

Just because you dont like my comments that hurt your feelings dont claim I am trolling.

 

[Skylar]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

Not about "warning" him. Although if charges were even CONTEMPLATED, it should have been an OFFICIAL deposition so that TRANSCRIPTS and RECORDINGS would be available.

Says who?

You make up pseudo-legal 'requirements' like you do your conspiracies: pulled sideways out of your ass.

Michael Flynn became a criminal when he lied to federal investigators. There's no other crime associated with his contact with the Russian ambassador that he's ever been charged with. Making your claims gibbering nonsense even by your imaginary 'requirements'.

 

[flacaltenn]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well.

Incoherent conspiracy batshit backed by nothing.

Who says that Mueller threatened Flynn's son? Not Flynn. Not Flynn's lawyers. Not Flynn's son. Not the prosecutors. Not Mueller. Not the judge.

Just you...citing your imagination. Which isn't evidence of anything. And contradicting you....is Michael Flynn himself. Who says he is voluntarily accepting the plea deal and isn't being threatened.

Your entire argument is doubly irrational. As 1) It isn't based on evidence, but imagination. 2) You have to ignore actual evidence to do it.

Why would any rational person do *either*?

He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

The same special counsel that found that Vince Foster commited suicide? That special counsel?

You're wallowing in conspiracy batshit lik a pig in mud. And using your NEXT baseless conspiracy as justification for your LAST baseless conspiracy.

What is the point of your fantastically elaborate, wildly complicated and gloriously fact free silly little fantasy? As even you can't factually establish your bullshit.

You're posting MORE than you're thinking. It's not a discussion.. I've given you many specifics that you didn't even absorb. Suggest you take more time to think about cogent responses instead of ad homs if you want replies..

YES moron.. Vince Forster was a suicide. Did you read his suicide note? And his SCHEDULE for interview with reps from "special counsel""..

 

[Skylar]

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

Not about "warning" him. Although if charges were even CONTEMPLATED, it should have been an OFFICIAL deposition so that TRANSCRIPTS and RECORDINGS would be available.

But instead a bigger question of WHY they were even trotting into the WHouse just days after the transition. Comey was asked that question yesterday and made up some bullshit excuse about the Logan Act.

Comey got LAUGHED at for that. The Logan act doesn't even APPLY to persons authorized to participate in foreign relations and affairs.. They had NO REASON to ambush him with intel acquired thru spying on an opposition political campaign. That's a LOT more important than whether he was "warned" or ambushed.

Before you continue to bait and troll, take a minute.. Give me a legitimate LEGAL reason for that ambush in the 1st days of the White House...

Who told you it should have been an official deposition? Law enforcement doesnt always find out youre a criminal by deposition. Sometimes they work on hunches.

Just because you dont like my comments that hurt your feelings dont claim I am trolling.

That would be his imagination. Flac....along with lots and lots of his fellow conservatives are just making up incoherent pseudo-legal gibberish that they insist are 'requirements'.

But aren't.

They're just their imagination. No one is obligated to abide any of what they make up. And they certainly don't excuse Flynn from lying to federal investigators.

 

[Leo123]

The day Drumpf appointed him. Why do you ask?

There is no 'Drumpf' there is no Russian 'collusion' there is only MSM collusion-illusion and Flynn is not and never has been a criminal.

 

[Asclepias]

The day Drumpf appointed him. Why do you ask?

There is no 'Drumpf' there is no Russian 'collusion' there is only MSM collusion-illusion and Flynn is not and never has been a criminal.

Drumpf colluded with the Ruskies and if Flynn is not a criminal why did he plead guilty to being a criminal?

 

[Skylar]

Flynn was asked specifically if law enforcement ambushed Flynn to lie about what he had done. Flynn said no. Flynn was not questioning anything law enforcement had done as it related to entrapment.And he was given the opportunity to dispute their claims. So, at the end of the day, that idiot Jeanine Pirro, Fox news, and Trumps stooge patrol were made into total clowns for the truth.

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well.

Incoherent conspiracy batshit backed by nothing.

Who says that Mueller threatened Flynn's son? Not Flynn. Not Flynn's lawyers. Not Flynn's son. Not the prosecutors. Not Mueller. Not the judge.

Just you...citing your imagination. Which isn't evidence of anything. And contradicting you....is Michael Flynn himself. Who says he is voluntarily accepting the plea deal and isn't being threatened.

Your entire argument is doubly irrational. As 1) It isn't based on evidence, but imagination. 2) You have to ignore actual evidence to do it.

Why would any rational person do *either*?

He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

The same special counsel that found that Vince Foster commited suicide? That special counsel?

You're wallowing in conspiracy batshit lik a pig in mud. And using your NEXT baseless conspiracy as justification for your LAST baseless conspiracy.

What is the point of your fantastically elaborate, wildly complicated and gloriously fact free silly little fantasy? As even you can't factually establish your bullshit.

You're posting MORE than you're thinking. It's not a discussion.. I've given you many specifics that you didn't even absorb. Suggest you take more time to think about cogent responses instead of ad homs if you want replies..

You've given me specific CONSPIRACY THEORIES. Used to as the basis of your other CONSPIRACY THEORIES.

At no point have you soiled your argument with facts, evidence, or even a coherent logic. Its a self contradictory mess of imagination where you make up pseudo-legal 'principles' that the investigators are supposedly bound to. Or imaginary 'reasons' for plea deals, pulled sideways out your ass.

But no, they aren't. None of the requirements you imagined existed. None of your conspiracy theories have a factual basis. And you're ignoring actual evidence. Like say, Michael Flynn admitting to his guilt. His lawyers admission of Flynn's guilt. Flynn's lawyers affirming that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

Huffing your conspiracy while ignoring the overwhelming evidence? That's wildly, wildly irrational.

 

[Skylar]

The day Drumpf appointed him. Why do you ask?

There is no 'Drumpf' there is no Russian 'collusion' there is only MSM collusion-illusion and Flynn is not and never has been a criminal.

Flynn disagrees, admiting that yes he is a criminal. That you say otherwise is meaningless, as you're nobody.

As for 'collusion', you may want to look at those court filings. Specifically Papodopolous admitting that senior Trump campaign officials told him to go to Russia to collect dirt on Hillary along with 'thousands of emails' from representatives of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

You can ignore the evidence.....but you can't make us ignore it.

 

[flacaltenn]

Ambushing and entrapment are legally different. He was INDEED ambushed. Because Comey was BRAGGING about it this past week. And under questioning from Congress, he could not even come up with a VALID REASON to send those interrogators to the White House.

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

Not about "warning" him. Although if charges were even CONTEMPLATED, it should have been an OFFICIAL deposition so that TRANSCRIPTS and RECORDINGS would be available.

But instead a bigger question of WHY they were even trotting into the WHouse just days after the transition. Comey was asked that question yesterday and made up some bullshit excuse about the Logan Act.

Comey got LAUGHED at for that. The Logan act doesn't even APPLY to persons authorized to participate in foreign relations and affairs.. They had NO REASON to ambush him with intel acquired thru spying on an opposition political campaign. That's a LOT more important than whether he was "warned" or ambushed.

Before you continue to bait and troll, take a minute.. Give me a legitimate LEGAL reason for that ambush in the 1st days of the White House...

Who told you it should have been an official deposition? Law enforcement doesnt always find out youre a criminal by deposition. Sometimes they work on hunches.

Just because you dont like my comments that hurt your feelings dont claim I am trolling.

Do they generally giggle about suspect comments like "Do I need a lawyer for this"???

Almost ALL of Mueller "plea deals" about lying to the FBI came out of encounters with no recordings or transcripts. Didn't even GET to a "criminal investigation" level because it WASN'T a criminal investigation for PapaDop or Flynn or Page or most of the others.

They were SET-UP by spying on the campaign with NSA assets used for terrorists and foreign spies. And all they had to do was flush them out into a lie. Even if that LIE -- like in Flynns case is COMPLETELY arguable.

The "lie" was in response to a question about "discussing sanctions".. Flynn said no. And embellished it to add that he was ASKED about sanctions by the Russian and told him QUOTE "We're not gonna discuss sanctions until the actual transistion"... That's IT.. THAT's what they HAD... And the agents present said they "thought Flynn was telling the truth"... Deal with it...

 

[whitehall]

Flynn's perjury trap is the best thing that ever happened to the crazy left wing. It inflames their hatred of the Military and the Trump administration even though it has nothing to do with the original allegation of "collusion".

 

[Asclepias]

Flynn's own attorneys admitted, in court, that Flynn wasn't entrapped.

You're just huffing conspiracy batshit on this one. There was no entrapment. Flynn admits his guilt. You're literally ignoring Michael Flynn on Michael Flynn's crimes........and replacing his admissions with your own imagination.

That's not how the law works, Flac.

That's not how the "law" works. That's how "plea deals" work. Mueller was threatening to ruin Flynn's son's life as well. He had no choice. He was financially tapped out. So Mueller can load any horseshit claims onto the plea deals and the victims have 2 choices..

1) Agree to cooperate and plead guilty to the WHOLE pile of shit and deny any FBI abuse OR

2) Shoot himself in the head like Vince Foster did when he was targeted by a special counsel.

Same reason that "campaign finance" charge was loaded on top of Cohens indictments. So Mueller can put words into his mouth and play him like a wooden dummy.. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS....

And again, entrapment has a very legal definition. Ambush -- does not. And AMBUSH is what happened to PapaDop and Caputo and OTHERS when they were "dirtied up" by a full-on Intel operation coordinated thru Halper in England. ANYTHING they "KNEW" about Russian interference was PLANTED on them COVERTLY by this cabal of CIA assets working them over BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION began.

No one really cares if he was ambushed. There is no requirement to warn a criminal before you catch him. We just want to make sure he wasnt entrapped. He said in court he wasnt. Everything else is just noise.

Not about "warning" him. Although if charges were even CONTEMPLATED, it should have been an OFFICIAL deposition so that TRANSCRIPTS and RECORDINGS would be available.

But instead a bigger question of WHY they were even trotting into the WHouse just days after the transition. Comey was asked that question yesterday and made up some bullshit excuse about the Logan Act.

Comey got LAUGHED at for that. The Logan act doesn't even APPLY to persons authorized to participate in foreign relations and affairs.. They had NO REASON to ambush him with intel acquired thru spying on an opposition political campaign. That's a LOT more important than whether he was "warned" or ambushed.

Before you continue to bait and troll, take a minute.. Give me a legitimate LEGAL reason for that ambush in the 1st days of the White House...

Who told you it should have been an official deposition? Law enforcement doesnt always find out youre a criminal by deposition. Sometimes they work on hunches.

Just because you dont like my comments that hurt your feelings dont claim I am trolling.

Do they generally giggle about suspect comments like "Do I need a lawyer for this"???

Almost ALL of Mueller "plea deals" about lying to the FBI came out of encounters with no recordings or transcripts. Didn't even GET to a "criminal investigation" level because it WASN'T a criminal investigation for PapaDop or Flynn or Page or most of the others.

They were SET-UP by spying on the campaign with NSA assets used for terrorists and foreign spies. And all they had to do was flush them out into a lie. Even if that LIE -- like in Flynns case is COMPLETELY arguable.

The "lie" was in response to a question about "discussing sanctions".. Flynn said no. And embellished it to add that he was ASKED about sanctions by the Russian and told him QUOTE "We're not gonna discuss sanctions until the actual transistion"... That's IT.. THAT's what they HAD... And the agents present said they "thought Flynn was telling the truth"... Deal with it...

So to sum your post up in one sentence. Flynn lied to the FBI and admitted it but I have to deal with it?