I've gotten death threats here. No, not from any of the regulars here. They came from the Stormfront crowd that piled in here shortly after Trump's 2016 win. All of that group eventually got themselves banned.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michigan fraud witness Melissa Carone says the Dominion CEO lied.
- Thread starter the other mike
- Start date
I've gotten death threats here. No, not from any of the regulars here. They came from the Stormfront crowd that piled in here shortly after Trump's 2016 win. All of that group eventually got themselves banned.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
No it's not made upJust making stuff up as you go along? You must be confusing me with anyone else on the Right Wing.Right wingers have nothing but the immorality of false witness bearing and practice the abomination of hypocrisy, seemingly like it is cultural Tradition, but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".I know no such thing.BS. You know it is and you lie about it. Apparently u'r just another shill.No evidence of that.How? The courts corrupt like you filth are.Prove it in Court, right wingers.
Trump's cases fail in court because he and his legal failures have no evidence.
There is no evidence of election theft which is why the cases are systematically being tossed out
That is a fact AND YOU KNOW IT
You CANNOT post a SHRED of ewvidence to supperot the claim of election theft AND YOU KNOW IT.
Go ahead LIAR post some evidence or shut the fuck up
SInce you routinely do all of those things you must be gthe lead right winger
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #104
Yes, it is. Right wingers only have fallacy with me not any valid arguments. Take them seriously at your own, intellectual risk. I resort to the fewest fallacies.No it's not made upJust making stuff up as you go along? You must be confusing me with anyone else on the Right Wing.Right wingers have nothing but the immorality of false witness bearing and practice the abomination of hypocrisy, seemingly like it is cultural Tradition, but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".I know no such thing.BS. You know it is and you lie about it. Apparently u'r just another shill.No evidence of that.How? The courts corrupt like you filth are.Prove it in Court, right wingers.
Trump's cases fail in court because he and his legal failures have no evidence.
There is no evidence of election theft which is why the cases are systematically being tossed out
That is a fact AND YOU KNOW IT
You CANNOT post a SHRED of ewvidence to supperot the claim of election theft AND YOU KNOW IT.
Go ahead LIAR post some evidence or shut the fuck up
SInce you routinely do all of those things you must be gthe lead right winger
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #105
lol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
You consistently post fallacies and never valid arguments that is proven fact and you know itYes, it is. Right wingers only have fallacy with me not any valid arguments. Take them seriously at your own, intellectual risk. I resort to the fewest fallacies.No it's not made upJust making stuff up as you go along? You must be confusing me with anyone else on the Right Wing.Right wingers have nothing but the immorality of false witness bearing and practice the abomination of hypocrisy, seemingly like it is cultural Tradition, but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".I know no such thing.BS. You know it is and you lie about it. Apparently u'r just another shill.No evidence of that.How? The courts corrupt like you filth are.Prove it in Court, right wingers.
Trump's cases fail in court because he and his legal failures have no evidence.
There is no evidence of election theft which is why the cases are systematically being tossed out
That is a fact AND YOU KNOW IT
You CANNOT post a SHRED of ewvidence to supperot the claim of election theft AND YOU KNOW IT.
Go ahead LIAR post some evidence or shut the fuck up
SInce you routinely do all of those things you must be gthe lead right winger
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #108
Maybe in right wing fantasy. It is only the protection of the Office that keeps Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice.wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #109
I only know the people who say that are true witness bearing challenged but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" regardless.You consistently post fallacies and never valid arguments that is proven fact and you know itYes, it is. Right wingers only have fallacy with me not any valid arguments. Take them seriously at your own, intellectual risk. I resort to the fewest fallacies.No it's not made upJust making stuff up as you go along? You must be confusing me with anyone else on the Right Wing.Right wingers have nothing but the immorality of false witness bearing and practice the abomination of hypocrisy, seemingly like it is cultural Tradition, but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".I know no such thing.BS. You know it is and you lie about it. Apparently u'r just another shill.No evidence of that.How? The courts corrupt like you filth are.Prove it in Court, right wingers.
Trump's cases fail in court because he and his legal failures have no evidence.
There is no evidence of election theft which is why the cases are systematically being tossed out
That is a fact AND YOU KNOW IT
You CANNOT post a SHRED of ewvidence to supperot the claim of election theft AND YOU KNOW IT.
Go ahead LIAR post some evidence or shut the fuck up
SInce you routinely do all of those things you must be gthe lead right winger
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
I have no guyMaybe in right wing fantasy. It is only the protection of the Office that keeps Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice.wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
The fact remains that the impeachment was strictly partisan revenge for Clinton the evidence was not there to convict
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
Yes that is you.I only know the people who say that are true witness bearing challenged but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" regardless.You consistently post fallacies and never valid arguments that is proven fact and you know itYes, it is. Right wingers only have fallacy with me not any valid arguments. Take them seriously at your own, intellectual risk. I resort to the fewest fallacies.No it's not made upJust making stuff up as you go along? You must be confusing me with anyone else on the Right Wing.Right wingers have nothing but the immorality of false witness bearing and practice the abomination of hypocrisy, seemingly like it is cultural Tradition, but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".I know no such thing.BS. You know it is and you lie about it. Apparently u'r just another shill.No evidence of that.How? The courts corrupt like you filth are.Prove it in Court, right wingers.
Trump's cases fail in court because he and his legal failures have no evidence.
There is no evidence of election theft which is why the cases are systematically being tossed out
That is a fact AND YOU KNOW IT
You CANNOT post a SHRED of ewvidence to supperot the claim of election theft AND YOU KNOW IT.
Go ahead LIAR post some evidence or shut the fuck up
SInce you routinely do all of those things you must be gthe lead right winger
Even through you are a proven liar and fool who posts fallacies
- Aug 4, 2009
- 280,578
- 138,946
- 2,300
The media loves making fun of Melissa Carone, but the truth is, if the tables were turned and the left thought Trump rigged the election she'd be on CNN every night.
Sadly, she was a laughably unreliable witness.
The fact that a once reliable Prosecutor like Rudy Giuliani would use her as a key witness for voter fraud shows how far Rudy has fallen and how ridiculous voter fraud claims are
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #113
lol. Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful. All the right wing had with Clinton was lying about a blowjob. Compare and contrast that with Your guy who is claiming nothing but Hoax.I have no guyMaybe in right wing fantasy. It is only the protection of the Office that keeps Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice.wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
The fact remains that the impeachment was strictly partisan revenge for Clinton the evidence was not there to convict
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #114
You are worse. I have resorted to fewer fallacies than anyone on this board. Why do you lie soo much? Do you want your Lord Satan to love you for your commitment to His Cause?Yes that is you.I only know the people who say that are true witness bearing challenged but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" regardless.You consistently post fallacies and never valid arguments that is proven fact and you know itYes, it is. Right wingers only have fallacy with me not any valid arguments. Take them seriously at your own, intellectual risk. I resort to the fewest fallacies.No it's not made upJust making stuff up as you go along? You must be confusing me with anyone else on the Right Wing.Right wingers have nothing but the immorality of false witness bearing and practice the abomination of hypocrisy, seemingly like it is cultural Tradition, but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".I know no such thing.BS. You know it is and you lie about it. Apparently u'r just another shill.No evidence of that.How? The courts corrupt like you filth are.Prove it in Court, right wingers.
Trump's cases fail in court because he and his legal failures have no evidence.
There is no evidence of election theft which is why the cases are systematically being tossed out
That is a fact AND YOU KNOW IT
You CANNOT post a SHRED of ewvidence to supperot the claim of election theft AND YOU KNOW IT.
Go ahead LIAR post some evidence or shut the fuck up
SInce you routinely do all of those things you must be gthe lead right winger
Even through you are a proven liar and fool who posts fallacies
The only thing keeping Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice is the Protection of the Office and the Right Wing who have no problem with Corruption but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".
Last edited:
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
It It is you with the fantasy footballlol. Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful. All the right wing had with Clinton was lying about a blowjob. Compare and contrast that with Your guy who is claiming nothing but Hoax.I have no guyMaybe in right wing fantasy. It is only the protection of the Office that keeps Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice.wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
The fact remains that the impeachment was strictly partisan revenge for Clinton the evidence was not there to convict
I have no guy
Both impeachment were partisan a d the Senate was right both times
Your side sought petty revenge
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #116
You have nothing but the moral turpitude of bearing false witness not any "gospel Truth".It It is you with the fantasy footballlol. Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful. All the right wing had with Clinton was lying about a blowjob. Compare and contrast that with Your guy who is claiming nothing but Hoax.I have no guyMaybe in right wing fantasy. It is only the protection of the Office that keeps Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice.wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
The fact remains that the impeachment was strictly partisan revenge for Clinton the evidence was not there to convict
I have no guy
Both impeachment were partisan a d the Senate was right both times
Your side sought petty revenge
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
You are worse. I have resorted to fewer fallacies than anyone on this board. Why do you lie soo much? Do you want your Lord Satan to love you for your commitment to His Cause?Yes that is you.I only know the people who say that are true witness bearing challenged but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth" regardless.You consistently post fallacies and never valid arguments that is proven fact and you know itYes, it is. Right wingers only have fallacy with me not any valid arguments. Take them seriously at your own, intellectual risk. I resort to the fewest fallacies.No it's not made upJust making stuff up as you go along? You must be confusing me with anyone else on the Right Wing.Right wingers have nothing but the immorality of false witness bearing and practice the abomination of hypocrisy, seemingly like it is cultural Tradition, but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".I know no such thing.BS. You know it is and you lie about it. Apparently u'r just another shill.No evidence of that.How? The courts corrupt like you filth are.Prove it in Court, right wingers.
Trump's cases fail in court because he and his legal failures have no evidence.
There is no evidence of election theft which is why the cases are systematically being tossed out
That is a fact AND YOU KNOW IT
You CANNOT post a SHRED of ewvidence to supperot the claim of election theft AND YOU KNOW IT.
Go ahead LIAR post some evidence or shut the fuck up
SInce you routinely do all of those things you must be gthe lead right winger
Even through you are a proven liar and fool who posts fallacies
The only thing keeping Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice is the Protection of the Office and the Right Wing who have no problem with Corruption but want to be taken as seriously as the "gospel Truth".
I am better than you, you consistently post fallacies more than anyone and are a proven liar
I state facts proving your endless lies
I have no guy trump can be thrown in prison for life and I would not give a shot
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
I state fact you near false witnessYou have nothing but the moral turpitude of bearing false witness not any "gospel Truth".It It is you with the fantasy footballlol. Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful. All the right wing had with Clinton was lying about a blowjob. Compare and contrast that with Your guy who is claiming nothing but Hoax.I have no guyMaybe in right wing fantasy. It is only the protection of the Office that keeps Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice.wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
The fact remains that the impeachment was strictly partisan revenge for Clinton the evidence was not there to convict
I have no guy
Both impeachment were partisan a d the Senate was right both times
Your side sought petty revenge
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #119
All you have is moral turpitude not the "gospel Truth". Only your Lord Satan loves that.I state fact you near false witnessYou have nothing but the moral turpitude of bearing false witness not any "gospel Truth".It It is you with the fantasy footballlol. Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful. All the right wing had with Clinton was lying about a blowjob. Compare and contrast that with Your guy who is claiming nothing but Hoax.I have no guyMaybe in right wing fantasy. It is only the protection of the Office that keeps Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice.wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
The fact remains that the impeachment was strictly partisan revenge for Clinton the evidence was not there to convict
I have no guy
Both impeachment were partisan a d the Senate was right both times
Your side sought petty revenge
16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,788
- 4,764
- 265
I have only facts which prove you to be a liar and foolAll you have is moral turpitude not the "gospel Truth". Only your Lord Satan loves that.I state fact you near false witnessYou have nothing but the moral turpitude of bearing false witness not any "gospel Truth".It It is you with the fantasy footballlol. Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful. All the right wing had with Clinton was lying about a blowjob. Compare and contrast that with Your guy who is claiming nothing but Hoax.I have no guyMaybe in right wing fantasy. It is only the protection of the Office that keeps Your guy from a date with Ms. Justice.wronglol. No, they didn't. It was pure partisan politics.They upheld the standard of innocent until proven guiltyIf she were testifying against Trump, the hearings would have been on every channel just like the BULLSHIT impeachment trial in January.Wrong.
If she were telling the truth she would demonstrate evidence.
Attacking someone for being a tool is not proof that the person is telling the truth
The right wing majority in the Senate has no problem with corruption. They proved it by not convicting Your guy. Why should anyone believe right wingers are interested in the morality of the "gospel Truth"?
there was no evidence and they decided correctly
The fact remains that the impeachment was strictly partisan revenge for Clinton the evidence was not there to convict
I have no guy
Both impeachment were partisan a d the Senate was right both times
Your side sought petty revenge
16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
He or she or whatever hates you being a beater of false witness
You lost only lies and fallacies
Similar threads
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 743
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 649
- Replies
- 154
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 625
- Views
- 21K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 66
- Views
- 304
- Replies
- 60
- Views
- 669
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 72
- Replies
- 58
- Views
- 156
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 466
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-