Michigan Pilot Draws Giant F U With Flight Path...

[satrebil]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

 

[OnePercenter]

I saw a Trump supporter shopping this morning.
View attachment 332261

That was in the white trash area of Southern California, Santee, Ca. The klantucky trash really kills home prices.

 

[OnePercenter]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

 

[jc456]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

back at you, if you're ordered into the boxcar, you getting in?

 

[satrebil]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

Nah, I'll just live my life while you cower in your closet holding your binky.

 

[OnePercenter]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

back at you, if you're ordered into the boxcar, you getting in?

Now you're getting stupid.

 

[OnePercenter]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

Nah, I'll just live my life while you cower in your closet holding your binky.

How am I not? I play golf almost every day. I take my boat out a couple times per week. I have food delivered. I'm following the rules and I am well.

 

[Rambunctious]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

Read the US constitution dummy....I'm sure you missed that in our worthless public school system....

 

[jc456]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

back at you, if you're ordered into the boxcar, you getting in?

Now you're getting stupid.

oh that's stupid? what about these people, make sure you tell everyone these people were stupid.

The first official Jewish transport to Auschwitz brought 999 young women. This is their story.

At the 75th anniversary of the liberation of the death camp, a survivor recalls how she came to Auschwitz in March 1942—and the terrible years that followed.

www.nationalgeographic.com

 

[Rambunctious]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

Nah, I'll just live my life while you cower in your closet holding your binky.

How am I not? I play golf almost every day. I take my boat out a couple times per week. I have food delivered. I'm following the rules and I am well.

So you are retired like me?...no wonder you are so insensitive to people going broke because of an out of control tyrant.....

 

[OnePercenter]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

Read the US constitution dummy....I'm sure you missed that in our worthless public school system....

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

 

[Rambunctious]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

Read the US constitution dummy....I'm sure you missed that in our worthless public school system....

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

She violated the US constitution.....

 

[OnePercenter]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

back at you, if you're ordered into the boxcar, you getting in?

Now you're getting stupid.

oh that's stupid? what about these people, make sure you tell everyone these people were stupid.

The first official Jewish transport to Auschwitz brought 999 young women. This is their story.

At the 75th anniversary of the liberation of the death camp, a survivor recalls how she came to Auschwitz in March 1942—and the terrible years that followed.

www.nationalgeographic.com

The Governor of Michigan is making you board box cars?

 

[OnePercenter]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

Nah, I'll just live my life while you cower in your closet holding your binky.

How am I not? I play golf almost every day. I take my boat out a couple times per week. I have food delivered. I'm following the rules and I am well.

So you are retired like me?...no wonder you are so insensitive to people going broke because of an out of control tyrant.....

You're starting to figure out that your skidmark is an "out of control tyrant....." Welcome to reality!

 

[OnePercenter]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

Read the US constitution dummy....I'm sure you missed that in our worthless public school system....

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

She violated the US constitution.....

Judges disagree with you.

 

[Rambunctious]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

You're asking the wrong question. Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Answer the question! Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

I'm not going to answer your question because it's irrelevant. I know what you're trying to do, you are going to try and spin it as "well the law says she can do x, y, and z" - and I don't give a shit. Owning slaves used to be "the law". That didn't justify it and the same principle holds true today. So I'll say it again - Legality is not a compass for righteousness.

You're not going to answer my question because it would blow your thesis, er, bloviating.

Oh please. I wrecked your argument before you even made it. Nice try though.

Is she following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

Were slave owners following the law? That's a "yes" or "no" question.

This should help you......

This should help you:

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Nothing to do with Michigan's stay at home orders.

Correct. But it has everything to do with laws and courts getting it WRONG. So pass all the laws you want. Quote all the legal opinions you want. Cite all the rulings you want. I don't care.

The Constitution did not come with an asterisk that stated "all rights contained within are void in case of a virus". Period. You will never get my compliance.

So everyone except you is wrong. Got It.....

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

Now, I await your assertion that slavery was perfectly fine because the law said so.

Millions of people are disregarding the lockdowns, tard. I'm not the only one.

If mikie jumps off the cliff you should follow him.......please.

Nah, I'll just live my life while you cower in your closet holding your binky.

How am I not? I play golf almost every day. I take my boat out a couple times per week. I have food delivered. I'm following the rules and I am well.

So you are retired like me?...no wonder you are so insensitive to people going broke because of an out of control tyrant.....

You're starting to figure out that your skidmark is an "out of control tyrant....." Welcome to reality!

First you have to admire and love and respect our constitution to know what I'm talking about...and sadly you are not there....

 

[Rambunctious]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

Read the US constitution dummy....I'm sure you missed that in our worthless public school system....

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

She violated the US constitution.....

Judges disagree with you.

Judges????? really?????how many judges?......what a dumb statement....

 

[westwall]

I saw a Trump supporter shopping this morning.
View attachment 332261

That was in the white trash area of Southern California, Santee, Ca. The klantucky trash really kills home prices.

Nope, Like I said, that is governor northam.

 

[westwall]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

Read the US constitution dummy....I'm sure you missed that in our worthless public school system....

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

DENYING CIVIL LIBERTIES UNDER COLOR OF AUTHORITY. TITLE 18 SEC. 243. YOU HAVE BEEN SHOWN THIS BEFORE! ASSHAT!

 

[OnePercenter]

...and points it directly at the governors mansion. Hilarious!!

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

Read the US constitution dummy....I'm sure you missed that in our worthless public school system....

What did the Governor do that was illegal?

She violated the US constitution.....

Judges disagree with you.

Judges????? really?????how many judges?......what a dumb statement....

From an actual Attorney that teaches constitutional law....