Militia in NV setting up checkpoints and demand ID's

Status
Not open for further replies.
Militias should always remember that the Posse Comitatus Act (forbidding the use of military for law enforcement) does not apply to armed insurrections against the federal government. Article I, Section 8 specifically grants the power "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;". Keyword being "suppress insurrections". If an armed group refuses to accept the authority of the federal government, the Feds are constitutionally authorized to hit 'em with a drone strike.

That's not the smartest tactic to start with, being one shouldn't create martyrs and put innocents at risk unnecessarily, but it is constitutionally allowable. The Rambos need to get it through their heads that sitting in the desert with a rifle is only scaring the locals, not the feds.

cite

That would be Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution. You appear to be unfamiliar with the document.
 
Militias should always remember that the Posse Comitatus Act (forbidding the use of military for law enforcement) does not apply to armed insurrections against the federal government. Article I, Section 8 specifically grants the power "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;". Keyword being "suppress insurrections". If an armed group refuses to accept the authority of the federal government, the Feds are constitutionally authorized to hit 'em with a drone strike.

That's not the smartest tactic to start with, being one shouldn't create martyrs and put innocents at risk unnecessarily, but it is constitutionally allowable. The Rambos need to get it through their heads that sitting in the desert with a rifle is only scaring the locals, not the feds.

cite

That would be Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution. You appear to be unfamiliar with the document.

Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

where does it say anything about a drone strike or military action?

you don't have a clue what you're talking about you far left winger
 
Militias should always remember that the Posse Comitatus Act (forbidding the use of military for law enforcement) does not apply to armed insurrections against the federal government. Article I, Section 8 specifically grants the power "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;". Keyword being "suppress insurrections". If an armed group refuses to accept the authority of the federal government, the Feds are constitutionally authorized to hit 'em with a drone strike.

That's not the smartest tactic to start with, being one shouldn't create martyrs and put innocents at risk unnecessarily, but it is constitutionally allowable. The Rambos need to get it through their heads that sitting in the desert with a rifle is only scaring the locals, not the feds.

cite

That would be Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution. You appear to be unfamiliar with the document.

Here are some words from "terrorists" you leftists hate with all your being...

{When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.}

Yes, they said God - I know you'd like to kill them for that, but they're already dead... :dunno:
 
https://westernrifleshooters.wordpr...tops-and-the-bundy-ranch-scene-sandman-sends/

I have assets on the ground, the State Police are watching the I15, but not acting over-zealous. There are NO roadblocks or Checkpoints set up currently. About 1000 pro-liberty folks onsite. Including Militia, IIIpers, Oathkeepers and locals.

And for those traveling, NV STATE Law prohibits long guns with one in the chamber. Just secure your arms and don’t be an idiot.

That story comes out of a Group called Operation Mutual Aid (OMA) The call themselves a Militia and are good at getting on TV but they are not part of OUR network. The story was a Militiaman’s (Ryan Payne) brother and his wife and kids got pulled. He apparently had loaded weapons and “supposedly” the State Troopers took them. I have never had good relations with OMA. They stir shit up and put out a lot of sensationalist crap. I call BS on anything originating from them.

"There are no roadblocks or checkpoints currently setup". Now that about says it all.
 
So, law abiding citizens who did pay their tax-subsidized grazing bill are being held hostage by one criminal.

Who, in their right mind, would be in favor of that?
 
Yurt, asking me to repeat everything a third time is making you look like a complete dumbass. If you're going to have a meltdown over my posts, you might want to try reading them first.

Now, the Constitution, in plain English, authorizes military force against insurrections. The only question is what qualifies as an insurrection. One guy, no. A thousand guys, yes.
 
Last edited:
Since the Oath takers have been thrown off the ranch, and retreated due to the rumor that there may be a drone strike, my best guess is that the only idiots left up there are Bundy's "security force", which probably operates only on Bundy's private land. I strongly suspect that there are no more public land roadblocks. That way, they can hide from the law, and do their chicken shit posturing without danger of prosecution. I am sure that if the feds try to return to BLM land to confiscate Bundy's cows, they will again venture out and do a George Wallace, who blocked a school house door from federal marshals for about 10 minutes. The feds will do it when it is about 115 degrees, and most will be back at their single wides throwing back a Bud Light.
 
So, law abiding citizens who did pay their tax-subsidized grazing bill are being held hostage by one criminal.

Who, in their right mind, would be in favor of that?

But Welfare Bundy is a "Patriot"....a Criminal....and an instigator.
 
Yurt, asking me to repeat everything a third time is making you look like a complete dumbass. If you're going to have a meltdown over my posts, you might want to try reading them first.

Now, the Constitution, in plain English, authorizes military force against insurrections. The only question is what qualifies as an insurrection. One guy, no. A thousand guys, yes.

That may not be possible....he keeps asking for "pictures."
 
The feds will do it when it is about 115 degrees, and most will be back at their single wides throwing back a Bud Light.
This.

Feds have all the time in the world and eventually Bundy will come out on the losing end of this. The less it is in the press and the less sensationalistic the headlines, the more these guys who just showed up to lend support will start to lose interest. Matter of time, count on it.
 
And at some point, there are going to some questions for these fellows. Those on 'disability'? Really, and you could travel to Nevada and run around in the desert. Perhaps you need to return all the money that has been given to you for a false disability claim. Those on welfare? Welfare is subsistance, so just where did you get the money for the fancy guns and travel. How about that new SUV? And those recieving unemployment? You were looking for work out in the desert? Names and companies, and we will ask them for the resume you submitted.
 
What happens if a law abiding, tax paying citizen refuses to stop at the checkpoint and/or refuses to show them ID or just rides by putting their 1st Amendment right of free speech to use as they call them terrorist assholes and to go fuck off?

IDK- Why don't you go try and then get back with us

-Geaux
 
Yurt, asking me to repeat everything a third time is making you look like a complete dumbass. If you're going to have a meltdown over my posts, you might want to try reading them first.

Now, the Constitution, in plain English, authorizes military force against insurrections. The only question is what qualifies as an insurrection. One guy, no. A thousand guys, yes.

where was the insurrection here? be specific you dumbass troll.
 
Yurt, asking me to repeat everything a third time is making you look like a complete dumbass. If you're going to have a meltdown over my posts, you might want to try reading them first.

Now, the Constitution, in plain English, authorizes military force against insurrections. The only question is what qualifies as an insurrection. One guy, no. A thousand guys, yes.

That may not be possible....he keeps asking for "pictures."

and you keep stupidly parroting that allegations are proof

just remember this when a dem is a accused of something via allegations you two faced hack
 
The feds will do it when it is about 115 degrees, and most will be back at their single wides throwing back a Bud Light.
This.

Feds have all the time in the world and eventually Bundy will come out on the losing end of this. The less it is in the press and the less sensationalistic the headlines, the more these guys who just showed up to lend support will start to lose interest. Matter of time, count on it.

Or the states may tell the feds that the land grab is going to stop. Bundy will happily pay fees to Nevada.

This isn't happening in a vacuum and it isn't an isolated incident.
 
iraq and afghanistan? lmao. the lunacy of far lefties is amazing. tell me....how many people have they killed? how many bullets fired?

Yurt supports far right banditry. But we all knew that.

i do? "we all"? do you have a mouse in your pocket liar? name one stance or post of mine that supports your claim i support far right banditry. edit: btw....your off topic trolling is noted two faced asshole

You were corrected, get over it. The issue is about the militia, which you are supporting in spirit in this thread. I am on OP and I suggest you get there.
 
The feds will do it when it is about 115 degrees, and most will be back at their single wides throwing back a Bud Light.
This.

Feds have all the time in the world and eventually Bundy will come out on the losing end of this. The less it is in the press and the less sensationalistic the headlines, the more these guys who just showed up to lend support will start to lose interest. Matter of time, count on it.

Or the states may tell the feds that the land grab is going to stop. Bundy will happily pay fees to Nevada.

This isn't happening in a vacuum and it isn't an isolated incident.

I'm from Georgia, and the last time Georgia told the feds that we were going to occupy federal property was in 1861.

It didn't work out too well for us.
 
We have been through this before, slackjaw: you did not then and do not now understand the terms. Step along.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top