jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 138,585
- 28,825
- 2,180
good for you!I just hate PC eternal-victims, Like Milo and the whole Breitbart crew.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
good for you!I just hate PC eternal-victims, Like Milo and the whole Breitbart crew.
Stand tough Snowflake....
He's a "snowflake" and you're a "tea bagger?"
I think your little brain has scrambled things, yet again.
You are allowed to patronize or boycott any speech you want. It is all part of being an American
Milo Yiannopoulos is an editor at Breitbart which certainly doesn't tolerate liberal points of view
Will you of the Khmer Rouge be enforcing your "boycott" with baseball bats and fire bombs?
I'm warning you!
Don't let me catch you reading that book
The Editor in Chief of a Book Review states that he is punishing a publisher for publishing a book that he disagrees with.
He is violating his professional responsibilities and ethics because his ideology in more important to him.
His view of Liberalism is that is should censor Conservative speech.
You are supporting that.
Liberals: All the self awareness of a turnip.
Milo Yiannopoulos has a first amendment right to freedom of speech
Anyone else has a first amendment right to oppose that speech and oppose those who publish it
Is this a great country or what?
That editor has a right to say what he wants.
Trying to punish someone else for publishing a book is not speech.
That is him abusing his position to pursue ideological ends.
I feel so sorry for Conservative Snowflakes
They are so sensitive these days
Constitutional rights to free speech cover actions by GOVERNMENT
Private citizens and businesses are allowed to do anything they wish to show disapproval of what others say and those who make a profit off it
Our country was founded on boycotts..
That editor the sole personal owner of the Book Review he is in charge of?
Or does he have a job to do, that he is not doing?
YOu can't put a liberal in charge of an ice cream stand. They will abuse whatever authority they are given to discriminate against their political enemies.
who is Milo Y?
The Editor in Chief of a Book Review states that he is punishing a publisher for publishing a book that he disagrees with.
He is violating his professional responsibilities and ethics because his ideology in more important to him.
His view of Liberalism is that is should censor Conservative speech.
You are supporting that.
Liberals: All the self awareness of a turnip.
Milo Yiannopoulos has a first amendment right to freedom of speech
Anyone else has a first amendment right to oppose that speech and oppose those who publish it
Is this a great country or what?
That editor has a right to say what he wants.
Trying to punish someone else for publishing a book is not speech.
That is him abusing his position to pursue ideological ends.
I feel so sorry for Conservative Snowflakes
They are so sensitive these days
Constitutional rights to free speech cover actions by GOVERNMENT
Private citizens and businesses are allowed to do anything they wish to show disapproval of what others say and those who make a profit off it
Our country was founded on boycotts..
That editor the sole personal owner of the Book Review he is in charge of?
Or does he have a job to do, that he is not doing?
YOu can't put a liberal in charge of an ice cream stand. They will abuse whatever authority they are given to discriminate against their political enemies.
A private book review can do whatever it wants. It is part of free speech as much as whatever craziness Milo spouts
who is Milo Y?
New rightwing hero
Think of a gay male Ann Coulter who hates gays
who is Milo Y?
New rightwing hero
Think of a gay male Ann Coulter who hates gays
Milo Yiannopoulos has a first amendment right to freedom of speech
Anyone else has a first amendment right to oppose that speech and oppose those who publish it
Is this a great country or what?
That editor has a right to say what he wants.
Trying to punish someone else for publishing a book is not speech.
That is him abusing his position to pursue ideological ends.
I feel so sorry for Conservative Snowflakes
They are so sensitive these days
Constitutional rights to free speech cover actions by GOVERNMENT
Private citizens and businesses are allowed to do anything they wish to show disapproval of what others say and those who make a profit off it
Our country was founded on boycotts..
That editor the sole personal owner of the Book Review he is in charge of?
Or does he have a job to do, that he is not doing?
YOu can't put a liberal in charge of an ice cream stand. They will abuse whatever authority they are given to discriminate against their political enemies.
A private book review can do whatever it wants. It is part of free speech as much as whatever craziness Milo spouts
This is the posted mission statement of the Chicago Book Review.
"Mission
The Chicago Review of Books is an independent literary review dedicated to cultivating awareness of diverse voices, settings, genres, and ideas in fiction, nonfiction, poetry, comics, and anything else that’s printed on paper, as well as the intersection of literature and the arts."
Please tell me how the editors actions is not a complete betrayal of his job and his responsibilities to the organization he works for.
New rightwing hero
Think of a gay male Ann Coulter who hates gays
You're filled with hate, but you don't know a fucking thing about the guy.
You spew hatred as fealty to the Khmer Rouge, never caring that there is literally zero accuracy in you smears
He is a tech journalist who dared think.
That editor has a right to say what he wants.
Trying to punish someone else for publishing a book is not speech.
That is him abusing his position to pursue ideological ends.
I feel so sorry for Conservative Snowflakes
They are so sensitive these days
Constitutional rights to free speech cover actions by GOVERNMENT
Private citizens and businesses are allowed to do anything they wish to show disapproval of what others say and those who make a profit off it
Our country was founded on boycotts..
That editor the sole personal owner of the Book Review he is in charge of?
Or does he have a job to do, that he is not doing?
YOu can't put a liberal in charge of an ice cream stand. They will abuse whatever authority they are given to discriminate against their political enemies.
A private book review can do whatever it wants. It is part of free speech as much as whatever craziness Milo spouts
This is the posted mission statement of the Chicago Book Review.
"Mission
The Chicago Review of Books is an independent literary review dedicated to cultivating awareness of diverse voices, settings, genres, and ideas in fiction, nonfiction, poetry, comics, and anything else that’s printed on paper, as well as the intersection of literature and the arts."
Please tell me how the editors actions is not a complete betrayal of his job and his responsibilities to the organization he works for.
The Chicago Review of Books is an independent literary review
They can review what they want
Again, I love that Milo is making faggotry chic among conservatives.
I feel so sorry for Conservative Snowflakes
They are so sensitive these days
Constitutional rights to free speech cover actions by GOVERNMENT
Private citizens and businesses are allowed to do anything they wish to show disapproval of what others say and those who make a profit off it
Our country was founded on boycotts..
That editor the sole personal owner of the Book Review he is in charge of?
Or does he have a job to do, that he is not doing?
YOu can't put a liberal in charge of an ice cream stand. They will abuse whatever authority they are given to discriminate against their political enemies.
A private book review can do whatever it wants. It is part of free speech as much as whatever craziness Milo spouts
This is the posted mission statement of the Chicago Book Review.
"Mission
The Chicago Review of Books is an independent literary review dedicated to cultivating awareness of diverse voices, settings, genres, and ideas in fiction, nonfiction, poetry, comics, and anything else that’s printed on paper, as well as the intersection of literature and the arts."
Please tell me how the editors actions is not a complete betrayal of his job and his responsibilities to the organization he works for.
The Chicago Review of Books is an independent literary review
They can review what they want
But it's not Morgan's personal plaything.
I posted it's stated mission.
Please tell me how the editors actions is not a complete betrayal of his job and his responsibilities to the organization he works for.
ok, so this guy is not an American, but supports Trump to be our president? And leading a movement in support of Trump....Why?
Again, I love that Milo is making faggotry chic among conservatives.
If "gay rights" is important to you, then the fact that conservatives are willing to embrace a homosexual just because he is ripping liberals a new asshole,
should be good news for you.