Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Since $15 per hour seems unreasonable for the (R) party,
I wonder if they would accept a minimum wage of $14.88 per hour.
Seems to fit the RWI agenda.
Sure, $14.88 sounds good. As long as you don't mind a $16.00 happy meal and $7.50/gallon gas.
The cost of labor is not that significant of a part of the cost of anything.
Just watch the checkout line at McDonalds, and you see at least 100 customers per hour, per check out employee.
With each customer spending about $15 average, that $1500 per hour.
Since there is also usually another in the back making food, make that $750 each per hour produce.
So then their current wages are only about 1% of what they are producing for the company.
Doubling it would only increase the cost of labor overhead to 2%.
The cost of labor is not that significant of a part of the cost of anything.
Really?
As a percentage of GDP, how much is labor in the US?
Just watch the checkout line at McDonalds, and you see at least 100 customers per hour, per check out employee.
Really? 36 seconds per order?
Since there is also usually another in the back making food, make that $750 each per hour produce. So then their current wages are only about 1% of what they are producing for the company.
Two workers "produce" 100% of revenue?
Are they growing all the food behind the store?
Of course there is other overhead, like the main one likely is rent.
The point is that the main overhead is not labor.
And if labor is only a minor part of the overhead, then even doubling the cost of labor is not an extreme increase in the overhead costs.
If labor is 5% for example, then doubling the cost of labor only increases the overhead by another 5%.
So if the prices went up 5% to cover the higher wages, it would be no big deal and everyone would be happy to pay it.
Of course there is other overhead, like the main one likely is rent.
Rent?
You think they're selling $1500 of food an hour with 2 workers.....the main one is likely materials.
The point is that the main overhead is not labor.
The point is labor in our economy is not 1% of GDP. So what is it?
And if labor is only a minor part of the overhead, then even doubling the cost of labor is not an extreme increase in the overhead costs.
If only you had some actual data.
If labor is 5% for example, then doubling the cost of labor only increases the overhead by another 5%.
What if labor is 25%? Or 50%?