Againsheila
Gold Member
Not the way the man in the OP did. He shot and disabled them. He did not have the right to continue shooting and purposely kill them after they were not a threat. Answer this: why are you so gung ho to kill people? Sounds like you really get a thrill out of thinking and talking about how you would take so much delight and pleasure is murdering someone. Sounds like you would get a hell of a lot of satisfaction out of it.
You may or may not be right about them "not being a threat" after the first shot. We can't assume anything until we know all of the facts.
The bottom line is that the man had a right to defend himself and his property. The criminals were in his house ... he didn't shoot them in their house. The moral of the story?: If you don't want to get shot don't break into someone else's home.
P.S. I would never get satisfaction over killing anyone. However, I do get satisfaction when justice is served. There's a difference.
I don't believe this. You and the other pro-gun people are absolutely frothing at the mouth hoping to get a chance to blow someone away: every post you guys make on this issue echoes just that thought.
Baloney. I'm pro gun and I don't even have one. I'm going to get one, eventually, but I don't have one right now, unless you count the ones we inherited and I don't even know if those work so there is no way I would grab them in a crises. The one I want is over $1,000, so it'll be awhile, probably forever.