Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CaféAuLait;9035936 said:As far as the dog was concerned, it was his yard.
The dog didn't know that it was a common area.
This is tragic...but I think the judge made the right call here.
If I was the parent, I'd want the dog dead too.
But that's an emotional response.
I wouldn't let my kids go near a dog on a chain without first consulting the owner...and neither would you.
It would be different if the dog ran out of the yard and attacked a random 4 year old at the park.
In this situation, it's just hard for me to blame the dog.
Wanting the dog dead is not her problem, ( the owner petitioned the dog be euthanized, not the mom) she is upset because more people seem to be concerned over the dog than her son. She was at work when this happened, this was not her fault. I agree with her, more people are discussing the dogs predicament than her son. Kevin will be left sightless in one eye, and food falls out of his mouth when he tries to eat because of the muscle being torn from his face. Not to mention the scaring of having had his face torn off. That is what his mother is upset about.
I agree I would not let a child around a dog without knowing it. The issue is the OWNER was sitting with the baby sitter as this happened., the child was playing as if the common area was a park. The owner should have stopped the child as well, especially since she knew it just killed a puppy.
I get what you're saying. This is very sad all around.
You stated you would (or might) be more sympathetic if the dog was in it's own yard.
My point is that a dog is going to be a dog.
It doesn't know the difference between it's yard and a common area.
The dog did exactly what a reasonable person would expect a dog on a chain in it's own yard to do.
The dog is going to act the same regardless. As far as the he is concerned, it WAS his yard.
I think that is why the plight of the dog engenders this response.
There's plenty of fault to go around, but IMO, very little falls upon the dog.
Nobody is proposing that the dog be killed because a kid took his bone.
What is being proposed is that a dog who mangled a child's face be put down. Because he's dangerous. The owner is to blame, and the baby sitter, but in the end, it's the dog that did the damage, and the dog who poses a threat.
People in this country are incredibly stupid about their dogs. They don't socialize them properly, then they cry when the dogs get in trouble. Fucking teach your dogs how to behave, or make fucking sure that they aren't going to be approached by anyone that could be hurt by them.
And don't let little kids hang out around chained dogs. It's imbecilic. Crap even if the dog hadn't bitten him, the chain alone can kill a kid.
It's always the fault of people, but that doesn't really help the dog. You can't just shoot people for being assholes.
I've never heard of the de-fanging thing. Do they take out all their teeth?
It's just sad all around. But people who are deal with animals have to come to terms with culling, at some point. If the dog is no longer a threat, there's no issue, really. But seriously, in the real world, outside of wherever that is, a dog bites a kid...that dogs going to be shot, probably on the site, before cops ever show up.
It's always the fault of people, but that doesn't really help the dog. You can't just shoot people for being assholes.
I've never heard of the de-fanging thing. Do they take out all their teeth?
It's just sad all around. But people who are deal with animals have to come to terms with culling, at some point. If the dog is no longer a threat, there's no issue, really. But seriously, in the real world, outside of wherever that is, a dog bites a kid...that dogs going to be shot, probably on the site, before cops ever show up.
In my mind the details are totally and unequivocally irrelevant. At no time whatsoever is it acceptable for an animal to attack a child, period. I dont care if the dog was on personal property or not he is dangerous to the extent that he is willing and able to attack a child. The only way that the details matter (IMHO) would be that of who retains accountability for the attack.CaféAuLait;9034615 said:Mickey was not on his own property but the common area of the apartment complex on a 18 foot chain. That bone could have been 17 feet away from Mickey and he still could have mauled the boy, ripping off half of his face.
Judge spares controversial pit bull's life
The owners and the apartment complex which allowed a dog who had just mauled a puppy to death in a common area are at fault. The baby sitter as well is at fault, however the owner of the dog, whom she was visiting should have warned her the dog was vicious and had just mauled another dog to death. A vicious dog should have never been allowed on a 18 foot chain in a common area for children to wander by and get mauled.
Well I just went for this report.
Now we have two different news reports. Which one is correct?
Help Save Mickey - His Life Depends on Us | Life With Dogs
This is why we have such a problem, because of such conflicting reports.
Our news should just be news and not opinion reports.
I think USA today is more accurate and the other is a plea for the dog.
But now you see why some are for the dog also.
He was an abused and neglected dog. Which is the owners fault. The owner did not tell the babysitter, also owners fault.
You have the parents (they had to know about this dog also) who did not warn the babysitter.
Then the babysitter who was not paying attention to the kid.
The Apartment Manager should have called the animal control unit when the dog killed the puppy.
If they had done that then this kid world not have gotten mauled.
This is what happens when nobody does their jobs at taking responsibility.
Four people did not do anything about this dog and this little boy is scared and maimed for life because of it.
I dont want to see the animal punished as one poster was calling for or that he should be put down because of some wrong that was committed. The question of morality here is moot because we are speaking about an animal. He should be put down simply because he presents a danger to children.
I think there is a clear problem with values here. Some are valuing the animal beyond that of the boy something that is completely foreign to me. The animal has value but it is FAR below that of a person and even lower than that of a child. Essentially, I dont care about the plight of a single dog vs. that of any person.
Noomi, in this country, neither dogs nor humans have the right to inflict damage upon children over a meal.
He's a dog. He's not a human. It's unfortunate, but that's the way it goes. We destroy animals that attack children in this country. At least we did.
Bullshit laws, KG. Same here, too. People think that they can go up to a dog pull its tail and poke its eyes out, and it shouldn't attack you.
My dog has bitten me before. I made the mistake of grabbing him by his collar (he was about to knock the television over) knowing that he hates that. He turned around and took a chunk of flesh from my wrist. I will have that scar for life, yet I didn't take him to the vet and demand he be put to sleep for attacking me.
Sometimes people need to be responsible, especially when it comes to small children.
CaféAuLait;9034879 said:The 4 year old wandered into the neighbor's yard and tried to take the dogs bone away.
Where was his mother then?? She let her 4 year old wander around unsupervised and then is pissed when the boy gets hurt??
The dog did not go after the boy. The boy came into the dog's yard and tried to take his bone away. He did what most dogs will do.
It was not his mom, but a baby sitter. And this dog was on a 18 foot chain in the common area of an apartment building- not a yard, still allowed to be chained there even after mauling a puppy to death.
Judge spares controversial pit bull's life
So go after the owner of the dog. The fact that an unsupervised 4 year old tried to take a bone away from a dog is not reason enough to kill the dog.
I don't know the situation concerning the pit killing the puppy. But what happened with the 4 year old, while tragic as hell, is not justification to kill the dog.
If a dog is eating a bone, you never walk up to it. The babysitter is at fault for not looking after the boy. Why should the dog be killed simply because it was defending its territory and its meal?
Noomi, in this country, neither dogs nor humans have the right to inflict damage upon children over a meal.
He's a dog. He's not a human. It's unfortunate, but that's the way it goes. We destroy animals that attack children in this country. At least we did.
Bullshit laws, KG. Same here, too. People think that they can go up to a dog pull its tail and poke its eyes out, and it shouldn't attack you.
My dog has bitten me before. I made the mistake of grabbing him by his collar (he was about to knock the television over) knowing that he hates that. He turned around and took a chunk of flesh from my wrist. I will have that scar for life, yet I didn't take him to the vet and demand he be put to sleep for attacking me.
Sometimes people need to be responsible, especially when it comes to small children.
I suspect if we had more information about the mother of this kid we would have a clue as to why people are rallying around the dog and not this mother. I suspect the mother of this kid is offended that more MONEY isn't pouring in, I suspect that's what's really bothering her. I suspect she is inclined to take a bad situation like this and try to make money from it.
I know people like that. Trash. They get themselves and their children into all kinds of trouble and then expect others to help them out.
I'm going to have to try and find a picture of her...a video of her talking would be even better. Then I'll know for sure if she's the "type" I'm thinking about. Which, as I said, will shed light on why people are rallying behind the dog.
So the mom is from Guatemala, and I've been doing some quick reading about stray dogs in Guatemala. Apparently there are a lot of skinny, stray dogs there. People just let them breed and then fend for themselves. So that gives me a bit of an idea why this woman has so much trouble understanding why people are caring so much about this dog that bit her kid. This dog was apparently abused, too, chained up and half-starved...similar to what she's used to seeing in Guatemala, probably thinks it's just fine and dandy...the norm.
It's almost like Karma...if she had cared about that chained up dog and maybe complained to the authorities about the conditions under which the dog was being kept...maybe the dog would have been rescued and wouldn't even have been there chained up, chewing on his bone, starving to death when her kid came along and took the bone out of his mouth. Maybe if she didn't think dogs were "just dogs," undeserving of mercy, this would never have happened.
![]()