More earthquakes in Oklahoma

Dot Com

Nullius in verba
Feb 15, 2011
52,842
7,883
1,830
Fairfax, NoVA
VEEERY interesting given they've only been recorded AFTER injecting fracking wastewater into the earth has become a common practice :eusa_think:

Record-tying Oklahoma earthquake felt as far away as Arizona
An increase in magnitude 3.0 or greater earthquakes in Oklahoma has been linked to underground disposal of wastewater from oil and natural gas production.

The Oklahoma Corporation Commission, which since 2013 has asked wastewater-well owners to reduce disposal volumes in parts of the state, is requiring 37 wells in a 514 square mile area around the epicenter of the earthquake to shut down within seven to 10 days because of previous connections between the injection of wastewater and earthquakes.

Discuss.....
 
VEEERY interesting given they've only been recorded AFTER injecting fracking wastewater into the earth has become a common practice :eusa_think:

Record-tying Oklahoma earthquake felt as far away as Arizona
An increase in magnitude 3.0 or greater earthquakes in Oklahoma has been linked to underground disposal of wastewater from oil and natural gas production.

The Oklahoma Corporation Commission, which since 2013 has asked wastewater-well owners to reduce disposal volumes in parts of the state, is requiring 37 wells in a 514 square mile area around the epicenter of the earthquake to shut down within seven to 10 days because of previous connections between the injection of wastewater and earthquakes.

Discuss.....
When I read the headline, my first thought was fracking. But I don't know enough about the effects of fracking yet to discuss this issue. It makes sense that fracking will produce some kind of result, and I have heard that the result is some sort of earth movement.... that many claim is harmless. But the jury is still out. And yet fracking seems to be a NIMBY project. Wanted, but not close by.
 
Inject a liquid under pressure into any material, and if there is a crack in that material, it will fill that crack, and also lubricate it. If there is pressure, compression in any direction, in that material, then that pressure is more likely to be relieved by movement in the material. If that material is in the crust of the earth, we call it an earthquake.
 
In Ohio, you have shale. It is very brittle. You can peel layers of it off of a larger piece. It isn't like rock. Under ground these layers of shale are buoyed by the oil and gas deposits under them. Remove the gas and oil and the shale sinks and crumbles. It makes the ground unstable.
Combine that with the doubling of movement in our tectonic plates and earthquakes are going to become more and more frequent. <( predicted in the Bible by the way.)
 
Last edited:
LOL It is not the rock that matters, it is the presence of faults and the amount of pressure on those faults. Inject liquid under pressure into those faults, and the rock will move, whether granite, limestone, or shale.
 
VEEERY interesting given they've only been recorded AFTER injecting fracking wastewater into the earth has become a common practice :eusa_think:

Record-tying Oklahoma earthquake felt as far away as Arizona
An increase in magnitude 3.0 or greater earthquakes in Oklahoma has been linked to underground disposal of wastewater from oil and natural gas production.

The Oklahoma Corporation Commission, which since 2013 has asked wastewater-well owners to reduce disposal volumes in parts of the state, is requiring 37 wells in a 514 square mile area around the epicenter of the earthquake to shut down within seven to 10 days because of previous connections between the injection of wastewater and earthquakes.

Discuss.....

Bull shit... The whole Craton edge is moving.. This level of quake has happened before so it is NOT unusual or out of character..
 
given they've only been recorded AFTER injecting fracking wastewater

bs

5.5 in 1952

for example
 
LOL It is not the rock that matters, it is the presence of faults and the amount of pressure on those faults. Inject liquid under pressure into those faults, and the rock will move, whether granite, limestone, or shale.
^ that

Plus the water is "waste" water which makes the practice even more deplorable
 
Induced Earthquakes

Within the central and eastern United States, the number of earthquakes has increased dramatically over the past few years. Between the years 1973–2008, there was an average of 21 earthquakes of magnitude three and larger in the central and eastern United States. This rate jumped to an average of 99 M3+ earthquakes per year in 2009–2013, and the rate continues to rise. In 2014, alone, there were 659 M3 and larger earthquakes. Most of these earthquakes are in the magnitude 3–4 range, large enough to have been felt by many people, yet small enough to rarely cause damage. There were reports of damage from some of the larger events, including the M5.6 Prague, Oklahoma earthquake and the M5.3 Trinidad, Colorado earthquake.


hockey-stick.png


Cumulative number of earthquakes with a magnitude of 3.0 or larger in the central and eastern United States, 1970–2016. The long-term rate of approximately 29 earthquakes per year increased sharply starting around 2009.

You people are so full of shit in denying the connection of fracking wastewater disposal to the earthquakes.
 
Why aren't there quakes at every fracking site then

Probably because they don't lie near NATURAL fault lines. It is a bit stupid to be lubricating the foundation along a fault line. It'll get handled. As soon as there is a class action for any actual damage.

BTW --- geothermal plants do the exact same thing. Massive amounts of NATURALLY corrosive toxic water shifted into receiving pools underground. And MOST of those are likely in areas where fractures and faults are likely.
 
Be that as it may, we're talking about anthromorphic phenomena

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk
 
Inject a liquid under pressure into any material, and if there is a crack in that material, it will fill that crack, and also lubricate it. If there is pressure, compression in any direction, in that material, then that pressure is more likely to be relieved by movement in the material. If that material is in the crust of the earth, we call it an earthquake.

How much water is injected?
 
Induced Earthquakes

Within the central and eastern United States, the number of earthquakes has increased dramatically over the past few years. Between the years 1973–2008, there was an average of 21 earthquakes of magnitude three and larger in the central and eastern United States. This rate jumped to an average of 99 M3+ earthquakes per year in 2009–2013, and the rate continues to rise. In 2014, alone, there were 659 M3 and larger earthquakes. Most of these earthquakes are in the magnitude 3–4 range, large enough to have been felt by many people, yet small enough to rarely cause damage. There were reports of damage from some of the larger events, including the M5.6 Prague, Oklahoma earthquake and the M5.3 Trinidad, Colorado earthquake.


hockey-stick.png


Cumulative number of earthquakes with a magnitude of 3.0 or larger in the central and eastern United States, 1970–2016. The long-term rate of approximately 29 earthquakes per year increased sharply starting around 2009.

You people are so full of shit in denying the connection of fracking wastewater disposal to the earthquakes.
Now show on that same map all fracking ops
 

Forum List

Back
Top