MORE GOOD NEWS: "Trump must turn over tax returns to NY prosecutors"

[Oddball]

Meanwhile, you want to bet that he hasn't been audited over the years at least a dozen times?

Audits only look at one set of books. Michael Cohen said that Trump kept two sets of books, and that they each claimed opposite property valuations.

Mike Cohen has said a lot of things. But he's a proven, admitted liar, serving time as a rat and a snitch.

Hardly appropriate to take his word as gospel

Nobody said Michael Cohen wasn't a low life snitch. And nobody will take his word for anything. That's why they want Trumps tax returns, because they already have his bank records, and if the two don't match, Trump is going to jail.

You've taken has word for it...I guess that makes you nobody.

And demanding records in search of a crime goes against every legal precept going back 500 years, uncle Joe.

 

[iceberg]

what law is this he breaking?

none.

fuck off.

Trump either broke tax law, or bank law.

so you don't know either and are fishing.

great. i'll send the authorities to come over and search through your entire history of life to find what we can potentially prosecute you for.

in essence what you are doing. if you don't want that shit done to you - stop trying to do it to others.

 

[Billy_Bob]

what law is this he breaking?

none.

fuck off.

Trump either broke tax law, or bank law.

Where's your evidence of that?

Trumps tax returns.

And you think the IRS, Obama's IRS would not of found something?

Nothing more than a Poke and hope in search of a crime..

 

[eddiew]

Trump fought the law but the law won
U.S. judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit to block subpoena for tax records


KAREN FREIFELD AND JONATHAN STEMPEL
Aug 20th 2020 10:42AM
(Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit by President Donald Trump that sought to block enforcement of a grand jury subpoena for eight years of his personal and corporate tax records.
U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero said granting the relief Trump sought would be an "undue expansion" of presidential immunity.
Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for Trump, told Reuters the president would appeal the ruling and seek to delay enforcement of the subpoena.

Meanwhile, you want to bet that he hasn't been audited over the years at least a dozen times?

Audits only look at one set of books. Michael Cohen said that Trump kept two sets of books, and that they each claimed opposite property valuations.

Mike Cohen has said a lot of things. But he's a proven, admitted liar, serving time as a rat and a snitch.

Hardly appropriate to take his word as gospel

Nobody said Michael Cohen wasn't a low life snitch. And nobody will take his word for anything. That's why they want Trumps tax returns, because they already have his bank records, and if the two don't match, Trump is going to jail.

Stone Manafort Flynn,Cohen and now Bannon Trump is lowlife scum and so are all his people Trump is setting records on how many court cases a president loses

 

[postman]

what law is this he breaking?

none.

fuck off.

Trump either broke tax law, or bank law.

Nope... Link to the laws he has supposedly broken...

Bank fraud and tax fraud.

Trump said his properties were worth more than they actually were in order to get a bank loan.
Then Trump said his properties were worth less than they actually were in order to pay less tax.

 

[iceberg]

Trump fought the law but the law won
U.S. judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit to block subpoena for tax records


KAREN FREIFELD AND JONATHAN STEMPEL
Aug 20th 2020 10:42AM
(Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit by President Donald Trump that sought to block enforcement of a grand jury subpoena for eight years of his personal and corporate tax records.
U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero said granting the relief Trump sought would be an "undue expansion" of presidential immunity.
Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for Trump, told Reuters the president would appeal the ruling and seek to delay enforcement of the subpoena.

Meanwhile, you want to bet that he hasn't been audited over the years at least a dozen times?

Audits only look at one set of books. Michael Cohen said that Trump kept two sets of books, and that they each claimed opposite property valuations.

Mike Cohen has said a lot of things. But he's a proven, admitted liar, serving time as a rat and a snitch.

Hardly appropriate to take his word as gospel

Nobody said Michael Cohen wasn't a low life snitch. And nobody will take his word for anything. That's why they want Trumps tax returns, because they already have his bank records, and if the two don't match, Trump is going to jail.

Stone Manafort Flynn,Cohen and now Bannon Trump is lowlife scum and so are all his people Trump is setting records on how many court cases a president loses

isn't justice supposed to be blind? you seem quite emotionally invested in the outcome.

that's on you. not your system. our system of government is not to be used for stupid petty emotional validation.

 

[Oddball]

Won't withstand an appeal....Beside that, his tax records will be of no political value (and make no mistake that this is 100% politics) after November....And this legal rigmarole will certainly drag on past election day.

So suck it.

They are looking at violation of laws so I hope he gets his day in court and stops claiming to be above the law.

what law is this he breaking?

none.

fuck off.

Reportedly campaign finance laws but we won’t know until the investigation is complete since the prosecutors don’t discuss ongoing matters.

The point is that a judge has determined Trump must comply with the subpoenas. He already lost his appeal to the SCOTUS.

"We won't know until we can force him to incriminate himself".

 

[iceberg]

what law is this he breaking?

none.

fuck off.

Trump either broke tax law, or bank law.

Nope... Link to the laws he has supposedly broken...

Bank fraud and tax fraud.

Trump said his properties were worth more than they actually were in order to get a bank loan.
Then Trump said his properties were worth less than they actually were in order to pay less tax.

dude - fuck'eth the hell'eth off'eth.

you're a total and complete joke.

 

[postman]

Fudging the books is something that he would have been caught at decades ago.

The rest of your lame baseless recriminations are just that....Lame and baseless.

How. The banks don't have Trumps tax records, and the IRS doesn't have Trumps bank records.

 

[eddiew]

Trump fought the law but the law won
U.S. judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit to block subpoena for tax records


KAREN FREIFELD AND JONATHAN STEMPEL
Aug 20th 2020 10:42AM
(Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit by President Donald Trump that sought to block enforcement of a grand jury subpoena for eight years of his personal and corporate tax records.
U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero said granting the relief Trump sought would be an "undue expansion" of presidential immunity.
Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for Trump, told Reuters the president would appeal the ruling and seek to delay enforcement of the subpoena.

Meanwhile, you want to bet that he hasn't been audited over the years at least a dozen times?

Audits only look at one set of books. Michael Cohen said that Trump kept two sets of books, and that they each claimed opposite property valuations.

Mike Cohen has said a lot of things. But he's a proven, admitted liar, serving time as a rat and a snitch.

Hardly appropriate to take his word as gospel

Nobody said Michael Cohen wasn't a low life snitch. And nobody will take his word for anything. That's why they want Trumps tax returns, because they already have his bank records, and if the two don't match, Trump is going to jail.

Stone Manafort Flynn,Cohen and now Bannon Trump is lowlife scum and so are all his people Trump is setting records on how many court cases a president loses

funny thing iceman the biggest fraud is trump and hopefully his time is coming soon after he loses the election He gets a chance to meet the NY AG

 

[BigDave]

Won't withstand an appeal....Beside that, his tax records will be of no political value (and make no mistake that this is 100% politics) after November....And this legal rigmarole will certainly drag on past election day.

So suck it.

I don't think the public will ever see these returns. The US Attorneys might but not the public. In November , Trump will either win or lose. If he loses, no one cares what is on the return. If he wins, the retaliation for releasing the returns to the public would be fierce. Liberal superstars might see their dirty laundry on the front page.

Trump himself said he would show his tax returns in 2016 and yet he has refused to live up to his own words..Hardly a noble gesture to lie.

Awwww....He took the liberty of bullshitting you....Deal with it.

Meanwhile, you want to bet that he hasn't been audited over the years at least a dozen times?

Why should I bet on a subject that neither of us can prove? Yes, I know Trump is a liar, anything to become president and line his pockets, pay for his whores and do a little fudging of da books.

Fudging the books is something that he would have been caught at decades ago.

The rest of your lame baseless recriminations are just that....Lame and baseless.

More Communist Democrat and Never Trumper desperation going into the November 3rd Elections

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Meanwhile, you want to bet that he hasn't been audited over the years at least a dozen times?

Audits only look at one set of books. Michael Cohen said that Trump kept two sets of books, and that they each claimed opposite property valuations.

Mike Cohen has said a lot of things. But he's a proven, admitted liar, serving time as a rat and a snitch.

Hardly appropriate to take his word as gospel

Nobody said Michael Cohen wasn't a low life snitch. And nobody will take his word for anything. That's why they want Trumps tax returns, because they already have his bank records, and if the two don't match, Trump is going to jail.

How many bong hits did it take to you to come up with that one?

 

[Moonglow]

Won't withstand an appeal....Beside that, his tax records will be of no political value (and make no mistake that this is 100% politics) after November....And this legal rigmarole will certainly drag on past election day.

So suck it.

I don't think the public will ever see these returns. The US Attorneys might but not the public. In November , Trump will either win or lose. If he loses, no one cares what is on the return. If he wins, the retaliation for releasing the returns to the public would be fierce. Liberal superstars might see their dirty laundry on the front page.

Trump himself said he would show his tax returns in 2016 and yet he has refused to live up to his own words..Hardly a noble gesture to lie.

Awwww....He took the liberty of bullshitting you....Deal with it.

Meanwhile, you want to bet that he hasn't been audited over the years at least a dozen times?

Why should I bet on a subject that neither of us can prove? Yes, I know Trump is a liar, anything to become president and line his pockets, pay for his whores and do a little fudging of da books.

Fudging the books is something that he would have been caught at decades ago.

The rest of your lame baseless recriminations are just that....Lame and baseless.

Yet the court says it is not and the grand jury that investigated him.

 

[postman]

And demanding records in search of a crime goes against every legal precept going back 500 years, uncle Joe.

It's not in search of a crime. We have the sworn testimony of a witness to attest to the crime. Now it's a matter of getting evidence of that crime.

Do you think the police should have been prevented from searching O.J.'s Brentwood home, or take a DNA blood sample. After all, they didn't even have a witness in that case who claims to have seen him commit a crime.

 

[eddiew]

if collusion with the russians fails to move you ice you must be part of the walking dead never mind all his people are crooks and thieves

 

[Oddball]

And demanding records in search of a crime goes against every legal precept going back 500 years, uncle Joe.

It's not in search of a crime. We have the sworn testimony of a witness to attest to the crime. Now it's a matter of getting evidence of that crime.

Do you think the police should have been prevented from searching O.J.'s Brentwood home, or take a DNA blood sample. After all, they didn't even have a witness in that case who claims to have seen him commit a crime.

Liar....There's absolutely no evidence of any criminal act anywhere.

You Stalinist bitches are truly frightening.

 

[Oddball]

if collusion with the russians fails to move you ice you must be part of the walking dead never mind all his people are crooks and thieves

 

[Penelope]

LOVE IT LOVE IT LOVE IT

Trump must turn over tax returns to NY prosecutors, judge rules
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero amounted to a second loss in Trump’s high-stakes court battle with Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance.

"Trump must turn over tax returns to NY prosecutors, judge rules

There isn't anything incriminating in the President's tax returns at all. The IRS, the Mueller team, etc., have all seen the returns. If they weren't all as clean as a hound's tooth, they would have been leaked by Weissman, Lerner, Comey or someone else.

No they didn't see tramp's tax returns.

 

[eddiew]

Mueller's mission was to take down President Trump by any means necessary.

He did fail, but he wasn't limited at all in the scope of documents and witnesses that he could call. Donald Jr. spent 30 hours of being grilled. Mueller even called all kinds of people who really don't know the President like Dr. Jerome Corsi, looking for anything at all.

Mueller never got to interview Trump. And the questions Trump answered were answered by his lawyers.

didn't the ah with a great memory say he didn't remember 30 times?

 

[Oddball]

Fudging the books is something that he would have been caught at decades ago.

The rest of your lame baseless recriminations are just that....Lame and baseless.

How. The banks don't have Trumps tax records, and the IRS doesn't have Trumps bank records.

Bank records are a matter of public record, according to a USSC ruling, dumbfuck....The IRS and any other tax agency can get them with a few phone calls.