skookerasbil
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #2,721
SSDD starts the day with a double eye poke to the AGW k00ks......the schooling is on Of course, they'll have some faux/fake/phoney/fraud theory response but that's what keeps this thread fun!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, any actual evidence the claims are wrong or is an ad hominem the best you can muster....It wouldn't matter if he were the janitor at your local grammar school if the information is true, it's true. Can you provide any hard evidence proving it is false?
Again, any actual evidence the claims are wrong or is an ad hominem the best you can muster....It wouldn't matter if he were the janitor at your local grammar school if the information is true, it's true. Can you provide any hard evidence proving it is false?
Soon even a janitor at the local grammar school can provide hard evidence that light does not produce the heat needed to perpetuate the AGW myth with a light source that does not emit mostly infrared.
You can measure the amount of heat an incandescent headlight puts out with a thermometer in front of it, because ~ 90% of the wattage these lights put out is infrared (heat).
None of the newer LED headlights will register any heat on a thermometer directly in front of it.
Even a janitor at the local grammar school can try it.
The thermometer will stay at ambient temperature with an LED headlight but register a temperature increase in front of an incandescent light which emits IR.
AGWarmers need to wring out their extra heat from the shorter wavelength light without the IR, because greenhouse gasses don`t just block outbound IR, they do the same with inbound IR.
..else the temperature gets stuck as it has been for 2 decades even though the CO2 ppm is up.
Winning has a lot to do with political power in reality. Obama spending hundreds billions of renewables and using the epa isn't a sign of a outright win by the skeptics.
LED lighting emits almost no IR photons from the junction itself, but IR may be re-admitted from the waste heat that goes into the substrate and the required heatsink.. STILL very minimal.. But the photon energy that IS emitted on very narrow spectral lines for a white LED is still CAPABLE of heating. You just have to provide a thermometer capable of absorbing in the higher part of the visible range. Paint the frame black or change the materials to a thermal conductor absorber and it will heat..
If you've ever used "UV cure" epoxies --- that's an example of very good high visible freq absorber..
So does every compound that has pi-bond electrons. They all absorb UV, but that does not heat up any of these compounds by the equivalent amount of "heat energy" with which they have been irradiated.If you've ever used "UV cure" epoxies --- that's an example of very good high visible freq absorber..
While all that heat is "hiding" deep down in the oceans:
The warmists are frantically "averaging" our winters with news of a few hot summer days in Australia and some warm water that they say manages to hide from the entire Argos network.
Morning AGW nutter nut sack kick of the day >>>
Three Signs of Retreat in the Global War on Climate Change
In the carbon wars, big oil is winning.
Three Signs of Retreat in the Global War on Climate Change | The Nation
Like several have said in these pages........costs matter........except to the AGW k00ks. Thankfully, to the rest of the world, costs are everything.
The greatest irony and funniest damn thing??..........
ALL of the global warming alarmists despise a growth generated economy!! But you absolutely cannot do this green stuff when growth is shit like it is now. ( 1.9% this quarter and last, for example ). The k00ks embrace this total bullshit Keynesian model which invariably means the corporate world is going to uber-embrace fossil fuels.
You stoopid morons..........wake up and smell the maple nut crunch!!!
U.S. manufacturing output falls as cold weatherbites
Again and again reality unfolds quite differently as the AGWarmers would like to see it. They spent all their time writing over 87 million blogs about the effect of a "warmer than normal climate" on the economy.Reports from official government agencies, private surveys and U.S. corporations have blamed colder-than-normal weather and heavy snowfall across large swaths of the country for everything from slack retail sales and weak employment data to poor industrial output.
About 87,400,000 results (0.32 seconds)
None of them ever said we would cease having winters. When Souix Falls gets to -40F almost every winter, raising the average global temperature by 2 or 3C isn't going to make much difference to folks trying to drive to work on a January morning.
The difference between getting yourself to work on a -40F morning and a -37F morning would not be significant. The difference between Arctic ice and no Arctic ice, sea level up a foot or more, half of Asia without drinking water and crops failing across the American midlands... those sorts of things would be significant.
I'm pretty sure I'm not generally that subtle, but if you're having trouble following what I say, just read it again more slowly. And if you're still having trouble, ask me to explain it to you in little words and short sentences. I made certain that when I said "isn't going to make much difference" that I specified precisely to what activity the temperature increase would lack significance. Wish you'd caught that and saved us this trouble; but I guess that's not often your way, is it.