- Banned
- #901
I am not an American. But I am unable to accept that politically appointed group of lawyers is infallible. Or that a different bunch would not come to quite different conclusions.
So distrusting your Supreme Court - or mine, or anyone's - does not make a person a traitor, even if his distrust is misplaced. If his distrust IS justified it makes him a wise patriot.
PeterF SHOULD be an honorary American because he understands the process better than 80% of our voters.. A 5 to 4 decision may have the power of law in this country, but it is STILL opinion. And neither the 4 or the 5 have a lock on the truth.. It's a matter of what the political balance was a decade before the decision when the appointments were made.
The FACT that we get so many 5 to 4 decisions should tell you that the debate on that topic isn't really over.. In MANY CASES, All it takes to OVERTURN a Supreme Ct ruling ---- is for Congress to rewrite the law..
I do not deserve the honour which you propose but thanks anyway!
Americans revere their constitution which is fine and dandy. But imo they should not regard it as perfect; like all human artifacts it is imperfect and its flaws will be magnified over time, if only because those who wrote it could not imagine today's United States.
You make the point very well. The constitution often, very often, needs to be interpreted. And the act of interpretation is, of necessity, political.
Do you have a more reliable alternative than rule of law and a supreme Court to interpret it?