Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.You cant just pull data and proclaim its accurate because you say so. You need supporting evidence which you cannot produce. So its false logic to ask someone else to have the burden of proof for your stats
I provided stats from 3 state police databases.
Police ARE mandated to report it to their state. Not the Feds.
He says they are innacurate.
Prove it. Show me a case where cops killed someone...but never reported it.
Just one.
You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
Naw they don't, they alter the data to make it accurate. That's the story and they're sticking to it. More accurate. thermometers cover 21% of the earth and they have accurate data.that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.You cant just pull data and proclaim its accurate because you say so. You need supporting evidence which you cannot produce. So its false logic to ask someone else to have the burden of proof for your stats
I provided stats from 3 state police databases.
Police ARE mandated to report it to their state. Not the Feds.
He says they are innacurate.
Prove it. Show me a case where cops killed someone...but never reported it.
Just one.
You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
Its like saying "Prove global warming stats are accurate". They'd have a heart attack if we demanded that. I happen to believe NASA and the NOAA (which is why I don't comment much on global warming btw)
too bad they missed you
that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.You cant just pull data and proclaim its accurate because you say so. You need supporting evidence which you cannot produce. So its false logic to ask someone else to have the burden of proof for your stats
I provided stats from 3 state police databases.
Police ARE mandated to report it to their state. Not the Feds.
He says they are innacurate.
Prove it. Show me a case where cops killed someone...but never reported it.
Just one.
You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.You cant just pull data and proclaim its accurate because you say so. You need supporting evidence which you cannot produce. So its false logic to ask someone else to have the burden of proof for your stats
I provided stats from 3 state police databases.
Police ARE mandated to report it to their state. Not the Feds.
He says they are innacurate.
Prove it. Show me a case where cops killed someone...but never reported it.
Just one.
You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
You're right, why ask someone to provide accurate data anyway! My goodness, asking if the information someone presents is accurate is unfair!
-says the people presenting data as accurate by sheer declaration
Well, by that standard alls I have to do is say its inaccurate and I win, right?
Its inaccurate! BAM!
go ask for the data and then tell me if you believe it is accurate or not. Then when you doubt it, explain why you doubt it. That should be simple for you.that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.You cant just pull data and proclaim its accurate because you say so. You need supporting evidence which you cannot produce. So its false logic to ask someone else to have the burden of proof for your stats
I provided stats from 3 state police databases.
Police ARE mandated to report it to their state. Not the Feds.
He says they are innacurate.
Prove it. Show me a case where cops killed someone...but never reported it.
Just one.
You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
You're right, why ask someone to provide accurate data anyway! My goodness, asking if the information someone presents is accurate is unfair!
-says the people presenting data as accurate by sheer declaration
Well, by that standard alls I have to do is say its inaccurate and I win, right?
Its inaccurate! BAM!
btw, if you don't believe the data is accurate, then post up the accurate data!that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.You cant just pull data and proclaim its accurate because you say so. You need supporting evidence which you cannot produce. So its false logic to ask someone else to have the burden of proof for your stats
I provided stats from 3 state police databases.
Police ARE mandated to report it to their state. Not the Feds.
He says they are innacurate.
Prove it. Show me a case where cops killed someone...but never reported it.
Just one.
You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
You're right, why ask someone to provide accurate data anyway! My goodness, asking if the information someone presents is accurate is unfair!
-says the people presenting data as accurate by sheer declaration
Well, by that standard alls I have to do is say its inaccurate and I win, right?
Its inaccurate! BAM!
btw, if you don't believe the data is accurate, then post up the accurate data!that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.You cant just pull data and proclaim its accurate because you say so. You need supporting evidence which you cannot produce. So its false logic to ask someone else to have the burden of proof for your stats
I provided stats from 3 state police databases.
Police ARE mandated to report it to their state. Not the Feds.
He says they are innacurate.
Prove it. Show me a case where cops killed someone...but never reported it.
Just one.
You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
You're right, why ask someone to provide accurate data anyway! My goodness, asking if the information someone presents is accurate is unfair!
-says the people presenting data as accurate by sheer declaration
Well, by that standard alls I have to do is say its inaccurate and I win, right?
Its inaccurate! BAM!
So far but not forever. HAAA HAAAtoo bad they missed you
I know, he's just a libturd trolling a message board.btw, if you don't believe the data is accurate, then post up the accurate data!that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.I provided stats from 3 state police databases.
Police ARE mandated to report it to their state. Not the Feds.
He says they are innacurate.
Prove it. Show me a case where cops killed someone...but never reported it.
Just one.
You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
You're right, why ask someone to provide accurate data anyway! My goodness, asking if the information someone presents is accurate is unfair!
-says the people presenting data as accurate by sheer declaration
Well, by that standard alls I have to do is say its inaccurate and I win, right?
Its inaccurate! BAM!
He's gonna say "But it doesn't exist!!"
When in fact...it does. Each state has it.
He says it's not accurate....but can't provide 1 link to a shooting that went unreported.
I know, he's just a libturd trolling a message board.btw, if you don't believe the data is accurate, then post up the accurate data!that's a stupid statement. By that remark nothing can be proven so all data is in error.You have to prove they are accurate. Again, you citing them and saying its true doesnt mean anything other than you believe they are true.
You're right, why ask someone to provide accurate data anyway! My goodness, asking if the information someone presents is accurate is unfair!
-says the people presenting data as accurate by sheer declaration
Well, by that standard alls I have to do is say its inaccurate and I win, right?
Its inaccurate! BAM!
He's gonna say "But it doesn't exist!!"
When in fact...it does. Each state has it.
He says it's not accurate....but can't provide 1 link to a shooting that went unreported.
If it came from the state why would I challenge it? I'm not sure what rabbit hole you're living in, but you should get out.In Oklahoma.....109 killed in 7 years.
Tulsa media gathered this....by FOIA of state police and state attorney general.
109 fatal police shootings in Oklahoma since 2007; 108 ruled justified
That's 4 out of 50 states I've done in 15 minutes.
And what's your evidence that the stats are reliable or accurate?
Remember, getting A number isn't the problem. Getting an accurate number is. With only 3% of local law enforcement reporting police shootings to the FBI.
With the FBI numbers using local law enforcement information less than HALF of what the Post found. With the FBI acknowleding that the Post numbers are better.
He'll just say that its accurate and JC will say its accurate because Bucs just said so
the theme from jeopardy here, don, don, don, don, don, don, don,.....don, don, don, don, ..DON, don, don, don, don......If it came from the state why would I challenge it? I'm not sure what rabbit hole you're living in, but you should get out.In Oklahoma.....109 killed in 7 years.
Tulsa media gathered this....by FOIA of state police and state attorney general.
109 fatal police shootings in Oklahoma since 2007; 108 ruled justified
That's 4 out of 50 states I've done in 15 minutes.
And what's your evidence that the stats are reliable or accurate?
Remember, getting A number isn't the problem. Getting an accurate number is. With only 3% of local law enforcement reporting police shootings to the FBI.
With the FBI numbers using local law enforcement information less than HALF of what the Post found. With the FBI acknowleding that the Post numbers are better.
He'll just say that its accurate and JC will say its accurate because Bucs just said so
Why would you resist cross referencing after saying the Post was smart to do so?
Did you read your link?
