Most homosexuals have had hundreds of different sexual partners ! !

[RKMBrown]

Lol...I've been in two committed monogamous relationships since 21. The current one for fourteen years. How many breeders can say that?

one relationship for 28 yrs. Its called a hetro marriage.

One hetro relationship, for 31 years since 20, 3 kids.

 

[GreenBean]

Queer in what way?

That guy's a troll, just IGNORE him.

The fact remains that this thread is a lie - most gay men DO NOT have hundreds of sex partners.

It's simply entertaining to kick this particular hornets nest, especially since the hornets in this particular next haven't any stingers.

It's also an interesting study of the mind of a closet case. He was booted from another forum I posted on over a year ago. And his rhetoric hasn't changed. That means hehas been obsessing about this fictitious "agenda" for over a year.

There is no way he can convince me that he is heterosexual. Why would he be so obsessed. I just find it funny and kind of sad. Perhaps he will come out in a few years.

I've been booted from forum after forum -because I refuse to bow down to political correctness- I remember you from politicalForums and disquspolitics you were a non-contributing imbecile then and you still are - you came at me like the pack animals you are 10 and 12 deep - and I beat your asses into the ground - the only way any of you queers could win an argument was by getting your opponent banned - which was easy being that your lackeys controlled the board.

Big difference between ten and now is that THEN - your side at least tried to debate the facts - but I destroyed every argument - one by one -torn to shreds - you no longer use facts - they work against you - so you've learned the art of deflecting and quite masterfully I might add - you've dodged every topic and deflected every argument without ever having to utter a word of truth - WHY ? Because the Truth Hurts - doesn't it ??

 

[JakeStarkey]

The issue is about proclivity and probability. You do the math.
It's pretty basic so if you can't figure it out I can't help you.

Your proclivity is that you offer nothing probative.

So let's move on.

Here's your probative. Look under 'transmission category' and get a non-dem to explain the math to you. That way it will be accurate.
CDC - Statistics Overview - Statistics Center - HIV/AIDS

That males are about sex? Yeah, we know that. All males are about sex.

 

[Indofred]

Gay marriage is a damn sick joke !!What is the average number of sex partners a gay man has in a lifetime

I've done that many, but only girls.
Of course, a few were girl sheep.

 

[RKMBrown]

You're Funny - I'll give you credit for that- and I do mean funny as in Ha ha [ Well ... okay I also mean it as funny like you're a little queer]

I find that normally, people who go around accusing others of being gay are the biggest flamers by far.

Just sayin.'

Calling someone Gay is the lowest insult you can possibly throw at another Human Being - I didn't call that slimy little faggot Gay- he freely admits that -I just said said he was a little funnny / queer.

No. Calling someone a democrat, that's the lowest insult. Calling someone gay is not an insult unless you spit it at them when you say it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Because the biggest flamers are mostly all latent sexually. Greenbean has a gay on for the guys.

 

[Peach]

Lol...I've been in two committed monogamous relationships since 21. The current one for fourteen years. How many breeders can say that?

You ain't special, howey.

Been with two women after marriage, the second after the first died.

Men overwhelmingly promiscuous, hetero and homo.

You know it, I know it, and now stop being stupid.

I know males that resist the pressure, and females who succumb, depends on the individual; insult aside, I applaud Howey, and you for not being "hewhores", as my father called them.

 

[NoNukes]

That's pretty much what it was like back then, I believe.

Yes it was, and women could have different sexual partners without being called a slut.

Well, that was certainly not true everywhere. In my Northern California town in the mid 70s to early 80s, a woman was still a slut if she had multiple sex partners...heck, you were even a little loose if you had one during HS.

New York City is quite often the exception to the rule. I was lucky to have lived there during that period.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I remember back in the early '80's Rolling Stone published an in depth article on gays with AIDS.
Now this was early info on AIDS since we didn't know a whole lot about the disease at the time.

I don't remember the specific #'s, but I remember being absolutely stunned reading in the article where it gave the average # of partners the average AIDS victim had been with at that time. It was literally shocking to someone as naïve as I was at the time.

Sadly so was Ronald Reagan; it seems "Just say NO!" failed to prevent the spread of AID's as it failed to prevent the use of drugs. Of course may RR and his conservative buddies figured it only afflicted gay men so why spend any money on research.

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

Gay marriage is a damn sick joke !!What is the average number of sex partners a gay man has in a lifetime

I am heterosexual and had hundreds of sexual partners. You are just jealous.

Yeah, sure you have. What normal male has the time and money to bed hundreds of women? Just chasing one can cost a small fortune and take months.

Dude, you had seven partners? You're just kidding, right? I can't even count all of them and the list is still growing.

I'm a man-whore and I'm proud!

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

I've been booted from forum after forum -because I refuse to bow down to political correctness...

You were booted because you act like a complete dumbass on-line.

No one is forcing you to be PC; It is YOU taking things to a whole other level.

 

[Inevitable]

That guy's a troll, just IGNORE him.

The fact remains that this thread is a lie - most gay men DO NOT have hundreds of sex partners.

It's simply entertaining to kick this particular hornets nest, especially since the hornets in this particular next haven't any stingers.

It's also an interesting study of the mind of a closet case. He was booted from another forum I posted on over a year ago. And his rhetoric hasn't changed. That means hehas been obsessing about this fictitious "agenda" for over a year.

There is no way he can convince me that he is heterosexual. Why would he be so obsessed. I just find it funny and kind of sad. Perhaps he will come out in a few years.

I've been booted from forum after forum -because I refuse to bow down to political correctness- I remember you from politicalForums and disquspolitics you were a non-contributing imbecile then and you still are - you came at me like the pack animals you are 10 and 12 deep - and I beat your asses into the ground - the only way any of you queers could win an argument was by getting your opponent banned - which was easy being that your lackeys controlled the board.

Big difference between ten and now is that THEN - your side at least tried to debate the facts - but I destroyed every argument - one by one -torn to shreds - you no longer use facts - they work against you - so you've learned the art of deflecting and quite masterfully I might add - you've dodged every topic and deflected every argument without ever having to utter a word of truth - WHY ? Because the Truth Hurts - doesn't it ??

You may be a legend in your own mind. But I Ssm afraid youhave me confused with somebody else. I haven't posted on those forums. Wow. Your condition is worse than I thought.

 

[Inevitable]

I've been booted from forum after forum -because I refuse to bow down to political correctness...

You were booted because you act like a complete dumbass on-line.

No one is forcing you to be PC; It is YOU taking things to a whole other level.

When you point out holes in his argument he calls you names and acts like a child. It's often the sign of a weak argument.

 

[DGS49]

The dynamic of homosexuality is fundamentally different from that of heterosexuality, and one would expect that the "natural" level of "promiscuity" would be dramatically higher.

In male-female interactions, a young, healthy male is ALWAYS seeking a path to sexual intercourse, but the female has to be encouraged and coaxed to that point, which effort is often unsuccessful. The old adage is true: Men give affection because they want sex; women give sex because they want affection.

But in male-male interaction, BOTH PARTIES are always seeking a path to intercourse of one form or another, unless one of them find the other repulsive in some way. So the normal and natural conclusion of most positive interactions is some sort of sexual encounter. This is known and expected within the gay community, and many "monogamous" gay couples have regular "date nights" where they each go out to find other men with whom to "have sex." Thus, the lifetime number of partners for a typical gay man will predictably be orders of magnitude higher than for a typical (usually married) heterosexual man.

Conversely, the "promiscuity" rate for lesbian couples is microscopic (except on Television Hospital Dramas, where it is quite common).

There are two relatively-recent factors that discourage male-male homosexual promiscuity: the AIDS pandemic, and the very public push for gay "marriage." So it is likely that a typical homosexual male would have fewer encounters now than in the era immediately preceding the AIDS pandemic, and there are many more instances of male couples actually being monogamous now - at least for a period of time - than before.

I am old enough to remember the initial news reports of the AIDS phenomenon, and researchers were emphatic in saying that most of the cases they were seeing were "extremely promiscuous homosexual men," not realizing that they were dealing with typical gay men. The researchers simply never imagined how promiscuous a "normal" gay sex life was. There was a common tale told about a particular male flight attendant who appeared to have spread The Bug to hundreds of other gay men all over the globe, a "feat" that was made possible by his busy international flight schedule.

Sadly, women who have the same attitude about sex that men do are either ugly as sin, or actresses in porn films.

 

[emilynghiem]

the fact is you have to be one horny perverted freak to be attracted to someone of the same sex !! and hell yes gays have numerous different partners !! how do you think stds spread through the gay community like wildfire ??if gay marriage is a good thing then the rate among them should be the divorce rates should be the same as straight couples.

Lol...Std's don't spread through the breeder community?

nowhere near the rate of the gay community . to prove my point that you are all a bunch of perverted horny freaks all one has to do is look at your sick avatar !! your avatar is a half naked freak waiting to get plugged in the ass !!you cant even keep gay perverted sexual images out of your posts !!

Hi [MENTION=31184]yidnar[/MENTION]

Nor could you help reacting to him in ALL HUGE CAPS.
As long as you both keep doing this, you both stay stuck.

Political opposites, the more you reject and repel each other
you are like fingers stuck in a woven Chinese "finger trap" each pointing at the other
but neither can let go.

When you push to meet in the middle you can release the pressure
and be free to speak like normal. Not this inciteful antagonism back and forth.

Good luck with your political karma.
For each reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction.
When you get tired of this, there is a better way out of the trap....

 

[emilynghiem]

Sadly, women who have the same attitude about sex that men do are either ugly as sin, or actresses in porn films.

I read the most stable couples tend to be people with similar attractiveness and history.

It's not a matter of probability or quantity out of "most men" or "most women"

It's about individual people respecting healthy relationships
that are unique to those two people.

When the right people find each other it's always "1 in a million."

If it was based on probability, nobody would ever find the right person to balance each other.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Gay marriage is a damn sick joke !!What is the average number of sex partners a gay man has in a lifetime

How many sex partners does an unmarried man have in a lifetime? Heck even married men.

I've read studies that say the average is something like 7 sexual partners, not hundreds.

This is like the myth of black men having huge penises.

The phobes, like bripat, are the ones spreading these lies and its because they're jealous.

Pretty funny to watch.

 

[September]

How many sex partners does an unmarried man have in a lifetime? Heck even married men.

I've read studies that say the average is something like 7 sexual partners, not hundreds.

This is like the myth of black men having huge penises.

I hate to break it to you but on average, black men do tend to be more hung than white guys.

 

[emilynghiem]

Queer in what way?

That guy's a troll, just IGNORE him.

The fact remains that this thread is a lie - most gay men DO NOT have hundreds of sex partners.

It's simply entertaining to kick this particular hornets nest, especially since the hornets in this particular next haven't any stingers.

It's also an interesting study of the mind of a closet case. He was booted from another forum I posted on over a year ago. And his rhetoric hasn't changed. That means hehas been obsessing about this fictitious "agenda" for over a year.

There is no way he can convince me that he is heterosexual. Why would he be so obsessed. I just find it funny and kind of sad. Perhaps he will come out in a few years.

Hi [MENTION=49586]Inevitable[/MENTION]: I think [MENTION=46353]GreenBean[/MENTION]'s drive is spiritual, and that is what he is struggling
with. He did not have language for the spiritual changes that he called "mental illness"
but he came right out and talked about Native American history with alcoholic addictions.

If his only language for these things is "mental illness" he could be on these forums to try to communicate, and either find language that works, or find people openminded and forgiving enough who can look past that and SEE what he is trying to say anyway.

I can try to read behind the lines, and you seem to be able to debate with him logically.

This is NOT easy stuff to talk about. You are good to keep him in check, so I think that is part of his process to learn to talk about this in the best way he can.

You have very high standards of consistency, so you don't see any good in his efforts.

But compared to many Native Americans who cannot share with others at all,
the deep injuries and trust issues, we are lucky if we can keep GreenBean at all.
He may have a huge advantage in being only part Native American.

I have had friends with even 1/4 and when they go off about alcoholic rages etc and just can't communicate, they have so much pain and distrust about betrayal and rejection
they become verbally abusive.

I am used to friends much worse than GreenBean who is at least trying to share.
Many won't even do that, it is too painful.

I think he benefits from interacting with you and me and maybe others here.
You may not see it, and yes I've seen people handle their issues better,
but I've also seen much much worse. I think he is getting better and your influence helps.

We might even help you back in return
by understanding where other people's thinking comes from
that isn't suppressed homosexuality but "suppressed spirituality" trying to come out!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lol...I've been in two committed monogamous relationships since 21. The current one for fourteen years. How many breeders can say that?

You ain't special, howey.

Been with two women after marriage, the second after the first died.

Men overwhelmingly promiscuous, hetero and homo.

You know it, I know it, and now stop being stupid.

I know males that resist the pressure, and females who succumb, depends on the individual; insult aside, I applaud Howey, and you for not being "hewhores", as my father called them.

Thank you. As long as Howey disrespects heterosexuals with such a term, I will rebuke and neg him. I do agree that I approve of his sexual restraint. I think that shows respect for his partner and himself.