OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 7,453
- 6,094
One guy might pay more for the first, another for the second.
This is where opinions factor in, Simp.
She has zero understanding of the real estate business.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One guy might pay more for the first, another for the second.
This is where opinions factor in, Simp.
God, you really are desperate to avoid reality.
So you’re trying to say that the presence of 7 mansions is irrelevant to the current market value of the property?
What marener likes to do is control the narrative, she takes things down a nonsensical path where she thinks she can 'win' points, but really have no bearing on the subject being discussed. Getting into the details of how appraisals work is just her mucking up the water so she can avoid the actual topic. How appraisals work has nothing to do with this case. And on top of that, she knows little to nothing about the topic, but acts like she is an expert. She does this in just about every thread, which is why I typically never respond to her posts, it's a complete waste of time.
Jesus, this is sad.Depends on the conditions of the buildings, and if they are to be used or replaced.
Jesus, this is sad.
Trump sure thought building mansions would increase the value of the property. Do you disagree with this premise?
Of course.
I’ve gotten a mortgage too and when I did, I made damn sure to be fully accurate on the paperwork.
But I guess that wasn’t necessary.
Kathy Hochul. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink. Y'all don't have to worry, we're not going after you.Who said that?
Really? So you think businesses are allowed to lie to banks?
I don’t think that’s true. I sure hope it isn’t.
Higher risk they passed on to Wall Street.because of the taking on of higher risks by the lenders.
Sad indeed.Jesus, this is sad.
Trump sure thought building mansions would increase the value of the property. Do you disagree with this premise?
"It wasn't overvaluing, it was assuming less risk of defaults".
But DEFAULT is exactly what happened, numbnuts.
The Fuel That Fed the Subprime Meltdown
View attachment 906027
Investopedia
https://www.investopedia.com › ... › Macroeconomics
During the subprime mortgage crisis, widespread defaults from subprime borrowers led to the collapse of the housing market, causing disaster for banks that ...
Incredible the number of no knowledge persons puffing out their chests about their fake moral outrage of “he overvalued”She has zero understanding of the real estate business.
Appeal on what grounds?The appeals court's opinion will matter, and failing that a federal court's opinion will matter.
That you had to spread out your response shows you don't actually understand any of this, you just see the result and start jerking off to it.
You poopyhead. I winTrolls.
This isn’t “gotcha”, it’s trying to get you to have an honest conversation for once in your life.Do you realize you are trying to get gotcha crap on bullshit?
Also, please go suck some Anti-fa cock.
Incredible the number of no knowledge persons puffing out their chests about their fake moral outrage of “he overvalued”
Plus it took some digging but to my reading the judge considered only the value of what some call “the club” and not all improvements on the whole parcel.
I bet they cry like little girls when the laws are ignored when their payback comes to their door,,The fascists are getting bolder and bolder. Thanks to the clueless idiots like the ones in this thread backing them.