MSM wall to wall with Clinton story

[DigitalDrifter]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

I guessed they realized that the gig is up and decided to play for the audience again.

Too fucking late.

Yeah either that or there is no rigged gig, they have always just covered the news they think their audiences wants to hear

According to the alt-right, unless the news is skull-fucking a dead Hillary clothed with an orange jumpsuit 24/7, it's an unfair bias and they are the victims.

Oh god please get rid of that vile sig picture.

 

[Norman]

Within a few days the FBI will once again announce there is nothing to indict Hillary for. This lets Comey AND Clinton off the hook. The media are just playing along.

That is almost certainly not going to happen... the FBI isn't that dysfunctional. They already screwed up once...

 

[Lastamender]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

I guessed they realized that the gig is up and decided to play for the audience again.

Too fucking late.

Yeah either that or there is no rigged gig, they have always just covered the news they think their audiences wants to hear

According to the alt-right, unless the news is skull-fucking a dead Hillary clothed with an orange jumpsuit 24/7, it's an unfair bias and they are the victims.

They haven't started the spin yet. It caught everyone by surprise. The MSM and Hillarys campaign will get together and figure out some lie. It might just not work this time.

 

[Slade3200]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

I guessed they realized that the gig is up and decided to play for the audience again.

Too fucking late.

Yeah either that or there is no rigged gig, they have always just covered the news they think their audiences wants to hear

Seconds spent on wikileaks, hours and hours spent on Trump claiming he brags of sexually assaulting women.

Yeh...


Now that they realize their candidate is in fact a criminal, well they can't support that.

I want you try and really think about this... The Russians hacked one of our political parties and gave private emails to wiki leaks which has been methodically releasing batches at a time in an effort to discredit a major candidate and influence our election. That is one of the biggest stories of all time and instead of looking at that you all want to talk about people's private email exchanges and rip them apart with as many assumtions as you can. Its pretty misguided, sick and embarrassing if you ask me.

Trump has led all the headlines because he makes headlines every day with his off message rants and attacks. It's not a mystery why he is the subject of most discussions. Now he has smartly stuck to the issues and taken a step back so Clinton can take the media heat. Let's see how long he can last.

I want you to THINK about this, since that's not what you have done so far.

For starters there is no evidence that Russia is behind the hacks. "Influencing the elections"... how about revealing fraud? Got to love how you consider the TRUTH to be an inference with the elections.

You think there is no evidence that Russia hacked us? You need to find a new source for your news. How about we go straight to the horses mouth
Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

 

[S.J.]

Within a few days the FBI will once again announce there is nothing to indict Hillary for. This lets Comey AND Clinton off the hook. The media are just playing along.

That is almost certainly not going to happen... the FBI isn't that dysfunctional. They already screwed up once...

They didn't screw up, Comey was ordered to recommend no indictment. The man is most likely being threatened. Stay tuned.
PS, I hope you're right, but I know how these people operate and I don't put anything past them.

 

[Slade3200]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

And now they all love Comey or is the FBI still rigged as well?

It's still rigged. The difference is is that hell froze over. One instance of unbiased coverage from biased networks doesn't change the fact that they are still biased.

Right and they decided to do their little "unbiased" night 11 days before the election. Smart thinking there chief

No, they decided to do it after the FBI stated that we are looking at a possible criminal having access to nuke codes.

Ok so your theory is that the MSM was rigged for Clinton but now after today's news they realize that she is a criminal so now they are against her and only reporting the story to appear impartial and regain there reputations. Is that your thinking?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Oh god please get rid of that vile sig picture.

roflmao

 

[JimBowie1958]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

And now they all love Comey or is the FBI still rigged as well?

It's still rigged. The difference is is that hell froze over. One instance of unbiased coverage from biased networks doesn't change the fact that they are still biased.

Right and they decided to do their little "unbiased" night 11 days before the election. Smart thinking there chief

No, they decided to do it after the FBI stated that we are looking at a possible criminal having access to nuke codes.

Ok so your theory is that the MSM was rigged for Clinton but now after today's news they realize that she is a criminal so now they are against her and only reporting the story to appear impartial and regain there reputations. Is that your thinking?

There is a point at which even the most slavish dog wont follow.

 

[S.J.]

I guessed they realized that the gig is up and decided to play for the audience again.

Too fucking late.

Yeah either that or there is no rigged gig, they have always just covered the news they think their audiences wants to hear

Seconds spent on wikileaks, hours and hours spent on Trump claiming he brags of sexually assaulting women.

Yeh...


Now that they realize their candidate is in fact a criminal, well they can't support that.

I want you try and really think about this... The Russians hacked one of our political parties and gave private emails to wiki leaks which has been methodically releasing batches at a time in an effort to discredit a major candidate and influence our election. That is one of the biggest stories of all time and instead of looking at that you all want to talk about people's private email exchanges and rip them apart with as many assumtions as you can. Its pretty misguided, sick and embarrassing if you ask me.

Trump has led all the headlines because he makes headlines every day with his off message rants and attacks. It's not a mystery why he is the subject of most discussions. Now he has smartly stuck to the issues and taken a step back so Clinton can take the media heat. Let's see how long he can last.

I want you to THINK about this, since that's not what you have done so far.

For starters there is no evidence that Russia is behind the hacks. "Influencing the elections"... how about revealing fraud? Got to love how you consider the TRUTH to be an inference with the elections.

You think there is no evidence that Russia hacked us? You need to find a new source for your news. How about we go straight to the horses mouth
Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

Who controls those agencies? 'Nuff said.

 

[Lastamender]

I guessed they realized that the gig is up and decided to play for the audience again.

Too fucking late.

Yeah either that or there is no rigged gig, they have always just covered the news they think their audiences wants to hear

Seconds spent on wikileaks, hours and hours spent on Trump claiming he brags of sexually assaulting women.

Yeh...


Now that they realize their candidate is in fact a criminal, well they can't support that.

I want you try and really think about this... The Russians hacked one of our political parties and gave private emails to wiki leaks which has been methodically releasing batches at a time in an effort to discredit a major candidate and influence our election. That is one of the biggest stories of all time and instead of looking at that you all want to talk about people's private email exchanges and rip them apart with as many assumtions as you can. Its pretty misguided, sick and embarrassing if you ask me.

Trump has led all the headlines because he makes headlines every day with his off message rants and attacks. It's not a mystery why he is the subject of most discussions. Now he has smartly stuck to the issues and taken a step back so Clinton can take the media heat. Let's see how long he can last.

I want you to THINK about this, since that's not what you have done so far.

For starters there is no evidence that Russia is behind the hacks. "Influencing the elections"... how about revealing fraud? Got to love how you consider the TRUTH to be an inference with the elections.

You think there is no evidence that Russia hacked us? You need to find a new source for your news. How about we go straight to the horses mouth
Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

I guessed they realized that the gig is up and decided to play for the audience again.

Too fucking late.

Yeah either that or there is no rigged gig, they have always just covered the news they think their audiences wants to hear

Seconds spent on wikileaks, hours and hours spent on Trump claiming he brags of sexually assaulting women.

Yeh...


Now that they realize their candidate is in fact a criminal, well they can't support that.

I want you try and really think about this... The Russians hacked one of our political parties and gave private emails to wiki leaks which has been methodically releasing batches at a time in an effort to discredit a major candidate and influence our election. That is one of the biggest stories of all time and instead of looking at that you all want to talk about people's private email exchanges and rip them apart with as many assumtions as you can. Its pretty misguided, sick and embarrassing if you ask me.

Trump has led all the headlines because he makes headlines every day with his off message rants and attacks. It's not a mystery why he is the subject of most discussions. Now he has smartly stuck to the issues and taken a step back so Clinton can take the media heat. Let's see how long he can last.

I want you to THINK about this, since that's not what you have done so far.

For starters there is no evidence that Russia is behind the hacks. "Influencing the elections"... how about revealing fraud? Got to love how you consider the TRUTH to be an inference with the elections.

You think there is no evidence that Russia hacked us? You need to find a new source for your news. How about we go straight to the horses mouth
Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

The DHS is just another lap dog of Obamas. I don't care what they think.

 

[Slade3200]

Yeah either that or there is no rigged gig, they have always just covered the news they think their audiences wants to hear

Seconds spent on wikileaks, hours and hours spent on Trump claiming he brags of sexually assaulting women.

Yeh...


Now that they realize their candidate is in fact a criminal, well they can't support that.

I want you try and really think about this... The Russians hacked one of our political parties and gave private emails to wiki leaks which has been methodically releasing batches at a time in an effort to discredit a major candidate and influence our election. That is one of the biggest stories of all time and instead of looking at that you all want to talk about people's private email exchanges and rip them apart with as many assumtions as you can. Its pretty misguided, sick and embarrassing if you ask me.

Trump has led all the headlines because he makes headlines every day with his off message rants and attacks. It's not a mystery why he is the subject of most discussions. Now he has smartly stuck to the issues and taken a step back so Clinton can take the media heat. Let's see how long he can last.

I want you to THINK about this, since that's not what you have done so far.

For starters there is no evidence that Russia is behind the hacks. "Influencing the elections"... how about revealing fraud? Got to love how you consider the TRUTH to be an inference with the elections.

You think there is no evidence that Russia hacked us? You need to find a new source for your news. How about we go straight to the horses mouth
Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

Who controls those agencies? 'Nuff said.

You discredited yourself during our last debate. Pardon if I don't waste any more of my time replying to your BS

 

[TheOldSchool]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

I guessed they realized that the gig is up and decided to play for the audience again.

Too fucking late.

Yeah either that or there is no rigged gig, they have always just covered the news they think their audiences wants to hear

According to the alt-right, unless the news is skull-fucking a dead Hillary clothed with an orange jumpsuit 24/7, it's an unfair bias and they are the victims.

Oh god please get rid of that vile sig picture.

I'll do so in 2029 when He steps down

 

[Slade3200]

Seconds spent on wikileaks, hours and hours spent on Trump claiming he brags of sexually assaulting women.

Yeh...


Now that they realize their candidate is in fact a criminal, well they can't support that.

I want you try and really think about this... The Russians hacked one of our political parties and gave private emails to wiki leaks which has been methodically releasing batches at a time in an effort to discredit a major candidate and influence our election. That is one of the biggest stories of all time and instead of looking at that you all want to talk about people's private email exchanges and rip them apart with as many assumtions as you can. Its pretty misguided, sick and embarrassing if you ask me.

Trump has led all the headlines because he makes headlines every day with his off message rants and attacks. It's not a mystery why he is the subject of most discussions. Now he has smartly stuck to the issues and taken a step back so Clinton can take the media heat. Let's see how long he can last.

I want you to THINK about this, since that's not what you have done so far.

For starters there is no evidence that Russia is behind the hacks. "Influencing the elections"... how about revealing fraud? Got to love how you consider the TRUTH to be an inference with the elections.

You think there is no evidence that Russia hacked us? You need to find a new source for your news. How about we go straight to the horses mouth
Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

Who controls those agencies? 'Nuff said.

You discredited yourself during our last debate. Pardon if I don't waste any more of my time replying to your BS

So you think Obama told the DHS to lie about their report? Really?

 

[Norman]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

And now they all love Comey or is the FBI still rigged as well?

It's still rigged. The difference is is that hell froze over. One instance of unbiased coverage from biased networks doesn't change the fact that they are still biased.

Right and they decided to do their little "unbiased" night 11 days before the election. Smart thinking there chief

No, they decided to do it after the FBI stated that we are looking at a possible criminal having access to nuke codes.

Ok so your theory is that the MSM was rigged for Clinton but now after today's news they realize that she is a criminal so now they are against her and only reporting the story to appear impartial and regain there reputations. Is that your thinking?

They still are biased. The media, almost without exceptions seems to only donate to Clinton. Not very surprising considering how she has flooded them with money.

It's just very difficult to spin this story, without coming across as a complete idiot.

 

[S.J.]

Seconds spent on wikileaks, hours and hours spent on Trump claiming he brags of sexually assaulting women.

Yeh...


Now that they realize their candidate is in fact a criminal, well they can't support that.

I want you try and really think about this... The Russians hacked one of our political parties and gave private emails to wiki leaks which has been methodically releasing batches at a time in an effort to discredit a major candidate and influence our election. That is one of the biggest stories of all time and instead of looking at that you all want to talk about people's private email exchanges and rip them apart with as many assumtions as you can. Its pretty misguided, sick and embarrassing if you ask me.

Trump has led all the headlines because he makes headlines every day with his off message rants and attacks. It's not a mystery why he is the subject of most discussions. Now he has smartly stuck to the issues and taken a step back so Clinton can take the media heat. Let's see how long he can last.

I want you to THINK about this, since that's not what you have done so far.

For starters there is no evidence that Russia is behind the hacks. "Influencing the elections"... how about revealing fraud? Got to love how you consider the TRUTH to be an inference with the elections.

You think there is no evidence that Russia hacked us? You need to find a new source for your news. How about we go straight to the horses mouth
Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

Who controls those agencies? 'Nuff said.

You discredited yourself during our last debate. Pardon if I don't waste any more of my time replying to your BS

You just did, moron.

 

[Slade3200]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

And now they all love Comey or is the FBI still rigged as well?

It's still rigged. The difference is is that hell froze over. One instance of unbiased coverage from biased networks doesn't change the fact that they are still biased.

Right and they decided to do their little "unbiased" night 11 days before the election. Smart thinking there chief

No, they decided to do it after the FBI stated that we are looking at a possible criminal having access to nuke codes.

Ok so your theory is that the MSM was rigged for Clinton but now after today's news they realize that she is a criminal so now they are against her and only reporting the story to appear impartial and regain there reputations. Is that your thinking?

They still are biased. The media, almost without exceptions seems to only donate to Clinton. Not very surprising considering how she has flooded them with money.

It's just very difficult to spin this story, without coming across as a complete idiot.

They can easily do a report on it and move on to another story but they have literally been doing Wall to wall coverage. Nothing is forcing them to do that

 

[TemplarKormac]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

And now they all love Comey or is the FBI still rigged as well?

It's still rigged. The difference is is that hell froze over. One instance of unbiased coverage from biased networks doesn't change the fact that they are still biased.

Right and they decided to do their little "unbiased" night 11 days before the election. Smart thinking there chief.

That's not what I said or implied.

It's as if they did it involuntarily. It is such a rare occasion that a biased media actually does unbiased reporting that it comes as a shock to everyone (including you) when they do it. This media is in the tank for Hillary, and Democrats generally. They will avoid any damaging stories on Hillary Clinton if at all possible. That is why I say this is such a rare (and hell freezing) occasion. Why would they choose to do it 11 days before an election? I dunno. Maybe they just did it in order to appear remotely objective. Which begs the question, why now is it suddenly you developing the conspiracy theories?

 

[S.J.]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

And now they all love Comey or is the FBI still rigged as well?

It's still rigged. The difference is is that hell froze over. One instance of unbiased coverage from biased networks doesn't change the fact that they are still biased.

Right and they decided to do their little "unbiased" night 11 days before the election. Smart thinking there chief.

That's not what I said or implied.

It's as if they did it involuntarily. It is such a rare occasion that a biased media actually does unbiased reporting that it comes as a shock to everyone (including you) when they do it. This media is in the tank for Hillary, and Democrats generally. They will avoid any damaging stories on Hillary Clinton if at all possible. That is why I say this is such a rare (and hell freezing) occasion. Why would they choose to do it 11 days before an election? I dunno. Maybe they just did it in order to appear remotely objective. Which begs the question, why now is it suddenly you developing the conspiracy theories?

This is why I keep saying it doesn't pass the smell test.

 

[Slade3200]

Every major network was covering the Clinton story for the vast majority of their programs. Do the Trumpsters who have been crying about unfair coverage understand how this works now or are they still going to claim that it is all rigged?

And now they all love Comey or is the FBI still rigged as well?

It's still rigged. The difference is is that hell froze over. One instance of unbiased coverage from biased networks doesn't change the fact that they are still biased.

Right and they decided to do their little "unbiased" night 11 days before the election. Smart thinking there chief.

That's not what I said or implied.

It's as if they did it involuntarily. It is such a rare occasion that a biased media actually does unbiased reporting that it comes as a shock to everyone (including you) when they do it. This media is in the tank for Hillary, and Democrats generally. They will avoid any damaging stories on Hillary Clinton if at all possible. That is why I say this is such a rare (and hell freezing) occasion. Why would they choose to do it 11 days before an election? I dunno. Maybe they just did it in order to appear remotely objective. Which begs the question, why now is it suddenly you developing the conspiracy theories?

I am debunking your conspiracy theory that the media is rigged. Today's reports don't come as a shock to me, but they should to you as they go directly what the Trumpsters have been saying.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I am debunking your conspiracy theory that the media is rigged.

I'm pretty sure you failed.