MSNBC Panel: Little Hope’ Zimmerman Will Be Convi

The problem with MSNBC is that it presumed that George Zimmerman was guilty. They emotionally held to that in spite of the fact that none of them were at the scene to witness what truly happened. Now they're left looking more than a little foolish because that string of thought they bound themselves to has become an anchor that's dragging them down into the muck of uncredibility. This is not the first time MSNBC has made a fool of itself by presuming guilt before the facts are laid out, nor is it the first time they've been overtly dishonest. Consider how MSNBC doctored photos and recordings relating to this trial in order to portray a false view of what was. Based on this and quite a few of their other unsavory actions, it's no wonder their ratings are abysmal.
 
Second degree murder was always an overreach

Manslaughter is the best bet
 
so Blacks believe they have the right to defend themselves in a life/death struggle, but White Hispanics don't? just lay on the pavement and let the villain beat u to death? right ??
 
so Blacks believe they have the right to defend themselves in a life/death struggle, but White Hispanics don't? just lay on the pavement and let the villain beat u to death? right ??

15 seconds after Zimmerman shot Martin, the police arrived.
 
In short, serious injury refers to the woman, not the fetus.

The reality is, babies under one month old were not counted in censuses of the people. Even that was considered too iffy a proposition when you had an infant mortality rate of upward of 50%.

I just used a common version of the Bible with the NIV translation. Why did the Bible even mention a "pregnant" woman if the unborn child wasn't to be referenced?

Well, obviously, to inidcate that a MATERIAL loss was made to the father, but it wasn't as serious as murder, hense why no more serious issue than a fine.

It wasn't a really bad crime like picking up sticks on the sabbath or being gay or not being a virgin on your wedding night of screaming "Jehovah!!!" when you dropped a rock on your foot.

They'd totally stone your ass for that. Because God loves you.

Cause a miscarriage. meh. Pay a fine.
 
Second degree murder was always an overreach

Manslaughter is the best bet

For self defense? :confused: Zimmerman was being beat on the ground.

When Zimmerman walks the meme will be the prosecutors over reached with Murder 2 and could have gotten a conviction on something else.
It isn't true. It isn't even possible. Both crimes have the same standards that must be met.
 
[

First he wasnt a child, the fact that you continue to call him one shows your bias.

I love it when Liberal progressives are so concerned with children,,,,until they want to abort them. :cuckoo:

Fetuses aren't children.

Never heard a woman who had an abortion ever refer to it as a child or a baby.

It was "that thing I need to take care of".

Trayvon was someone's child. He wasn't breaking any laws, he was unarmed, he was a minor and he did nothing to deserve being shot in the middle of the street by a cop wannabe.

If it has a heartbeat it is a child. Women that willing abort for convience prolly avoid the "child" label. They might not feel comfortable killing "it" if it has a human label.
 
yet the left still is convinced/or pretending to believe that George followed Trayvon to his vehicle, jumped him and beat him up. so where are all of the head injuries/scars on Trayvons head?
 
Quick question...................if Trayvon grabbed the gun like Zimmerman said, then why was there none of his DNA on Zimmerman's gun.

And..................for that matter, you saw how bald Zimmerman was at the time of the shooting, and he'd claimed that Trayvon was slamming his head into the ground....................so why was there none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?
 
Quick question...................if Trayvon grabbed the gun like Zimmerman said, then why was there none of his DNA on Zimmerman's gun.

And..................for that matter, you saw how bald Zimmerman was at the time of the shooting, and he'd claimed that Trayvon was slamming his head into the ground....................so why was there none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?

Quick question.....................if Zimmerman pulled the trigger why was his DNA not found on the trigger?

And.....................for that matter, why was Zimmerman's prints not on his own gun?

And......................for that matter, how did those injuries occur on Zimmerman if Trayvon wasn't slamming his head on the concrete (please give evidence, not your opinion)?

....................so why did they only use two swabs to try and collect DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?........................why did they not store it properly?..............Big question...............Do they have any evidence you can substantially show that Trayvon didn't start the fight????????????...............so why does Trayvon not have any injuries other than gsw if Zimmerman threw the first punch?........why is Zimmerman's blood on the right cuff of the sweatshirt worn under that famous hoodie???????????
 

Forum List

Back
Top