MSNBC Panel: Little Hope’ Zimmerman Will Be Convi

2 people, a white guy saying the prosecution wasn't doing a good job and a black man saying people believe a black kid can't get justice.

MSNBC was critical of Obama in the debates and the right used that as proof Obama would lose.

Let's stick with the evidence. This is what happens when you judge things based on emotions.

The evidence looks good for Zimmerman.

How so? The medical examiner said the injuries were minor and no where near life threatening.

Apparently you've never whacked your head on a frig door or something of that nature. It always feels really awful and I would imagine getting your head pushed against the pavement would far, far worse. All Zimmerman would know is that he is in pain due to the repeated poundings. If someone causes you that kind of pain, of course you feel threatened. Who stops to think that maybe it won't be life threatening. It might well feel that way at the time and be enough for a person to instantly strike back. Sounds like Zimmerman wasn't much of a fighter and his only defense may have been the gun. Has anyone here ever been beat up? I'm just curious if anyone can describe how it feels and what they'd do if they weren't strong enough to fight back. What if you did have a gun under your coat and you knew the person beating you spotted it?

I haven't heard any evidence that Zimmerman is the type who would hurt anyone. He was described as being more meek and not aggressive. Martin sounds like he was the opposite and I doubt that either of them ever imagined how it would end that night. I believe at this point that Martin circled around and confronted Zimmerman and picked a fight. He was a smart ass kid ready to get into a fight with a guy who probably didn't seem too threatening. Martin clearly wasn't scared of him or he would have just kept going back to the house where he was staying. Even if Zimmerman had been chasing him, he could have outrun him no problem.

It sucks that this happened, but there doesn't always have to be a bad guy, just bad judgment on both their parts at different times.
 
Quick question...................if Trayvon grabbed the gun like Zimmerman said, then why was there none of his DNA on Zimmerman's gun.

And..................for that matter, you saw how bald Zimmerman was at the time of the shooting, and he'd claimed that Trayvon was slamming his head into the ground....................so why was there none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?

Quick question.....................if Zimmerman pulled the trigger why was his DNA not found on the trigger?

And.....................for that matter, why was Zimmerman's prints not on his own gun?

And......................for that matter, how did those injuries occur on Zimmerman if Trayvon wasn't slamming his head on the concrete (please give evidence, not your opinion)?

....................so why did they only use two swabs to try and collect DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?........................why did they not store it properly?..............Big question...............Do they have any evidence you can substantially show that Trayvon didn't start the fight????????????...............so why does Trayvon not have any injuries other than gsw if Zimmerman threw the first punch?........why is Zimmerman's blood on the right cuff of the sweatshirt worn under that famous hoodie???????????

Actually, the DNA expert said that there was plenty of Zimmerman's DNA on the gun, but there was nothing on the weapon that could be traced back to Trayvon.

Did you actually watch the trial, or did you get the Cliff's notes from FAUX Nooze?

Me? I've been watching the trial.
 
Quick question...................if Trayvon grabbed the gun like Zimmerman said, then why was there none of his DNA on Zimmerman's gun.

And..................for that matter, you saw how bald Zimmerman was at the time of the shooting, and he'd claimed that Trayvon was slamming his head into the ground....................so why was there none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?

DNA isn't necessarily transferred by touching

and why would there be DNA under TM's fingernails if it was punching and not scratching?

glad you are not a juror
 
Quick question...................if Trayvon grabbed the gun like Zimmerman said, then why was there none of his DNA on Zimmerman's gun.

And..................for that matter, you saw how bald Zimmerman was at the time of the shooting, and he'd claimed that Trayvon was slamming his head into the ground....................so why was there none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?

DNA isn't necessarily transferred by touching

and why would there be DNA under TM's fingernails if it was punching and not scratching?

glad you are not a juror

Was he punching or slamming Zimmerman's head against the pavement?

If the latter, which is what Zimmerman is claiming, there should be DNA under his fingernails.
 
Quick question...................if Trayvon grabbed the gun like Zimmerman said, then why was there none of his DNA on Zimmerman's gun.

And..................for that matter, you saw how bald Zimmerman was at the time of the shooting, and he'd claimed that Trayvon was slamming his head into the ground....................so why was there none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?

DNA isn't necessarily transferred by touching

and why would there be DNA under TM's fingernails if it was punching and not scratching?

glad you are not a juror

Was he punching or slamming Zimmerman's head against the pavement?

If the latter, which is what Zimmerman is claiming, there should be DNA under his fingernails.

Horseshit. What forensic credentials do you have?
 
Quick question...................if Trayvon grabbed the gun like Zimmerman said, then why was there none of his DNA on Zimmerman's gun.

And..................for that matter, you saw how bald Zimmerman was at the time of the shooting, and he'd claimed that Trayvon was slamming his head into the ground....................so why was there none of Zimmerman's DNA under Trayvon's fingernails?

DNA isn't necessarily transferred by touching

and why would there be DNA under TM's fingernails if it was punching and not scratching?

glad you are not a juror

Was he punching or slamming Zimmerman's head against the pavement?

If the latter, which is what Zimmerman is claiming, there should be DNA under his fingernails.

Not if they were cut too short.

His hands were not protected from the elements for over three hours.
 
DNA isn't necessarily transferred by touching

and why would there be DNA under TM's fingernails if it was punching and not scratching?

glad you are not a juror

Was he punching or slamming Zimmerman's head against the pavement?

If the latter, which is what Zimmerman is claiming, there should be DNA under his fingernails.

Horseshit. What forensic credentials do you have?

Too tough a question for you?

Actually, the prosecution's forensic team asked the same question.
 
Was he punching or slamming Zimmerman's head against the pavement?

If the latter, which is what Zimmerman is claiming, there should be DNA under his fingernails.

Horseshit. What forensic credentials do you have?

Too tough a question for you?

In other words, your forensic expertise is zero.

Actually, the prosecution's forensic team asked the same question.

You mean they didn't know?
 
DNA isn't necessarily transferred by touching

and why would there be DNA under TM's fingernails if it was punching and not scratching?

glad you are not a juror

Was he punching or slamming Zimmerman's head against the pavement?

If the latter, which is what Zimmerman is claiming, there should be DNA under his fingernails.

Horseshit. What forensic credentials do you have?


Double horse shit. You have never been in a real fist fight in your life. If Martin was slamming this guys head into the ground with enough force to crack skulls, and make Zimmerman think he was gonna die, there would have been DNA under the nails.

What, you think he grabbed his bald ass head with his hand closed in a fist? How stupid are you? If Martin was the bad ass mixed martial atrist, he would have been grabbing, gouging and pounding and there would have been DNA on his hands and under his nails.

Instead. Zimmerman confronted the kid, the kid got mouthy, Zimmerman got in the kids face, the kid knocked Zimmerman down where he hit his head, Zimmerman goes for his gun while the kid gets on his chest and starts to kick Zimmermans ass and Zimmerman shoots him while the kid is on top.

Zimmerman is a pussy, picked the fight. was going to get his ass kicked, shot the kid and should go to jail for a long time.

But he won't. But he will have to live with the fact he shot and killed a young man for no good reason.

If Zimmerman didn't want to play the bad ass, wannabe cop, none of this would have happened.
 
If Martin was slamming this guys head into the ground with enough force to crack skulls, and make Zimmerman think he was gonna die, there would have been DNA under the nails.

Not if Martin's fingernail's were cut or gnawed below the tips.

THE ME testified TM's hands were not properly protected either to preserve the evidence from the elements.
 
Last edited:
.

This trial isn't about evidence, it's about racial politics.

Zimmerman & Martin are merely the pawns.

.

perhaps.

But the racial politics here are, that if your kid goes out for candy, you should not expect him to be stalked and then shot by citizen because of his race.

IF Zimmerman was black and Trayvon were white, there'd be no issue here. Zimmerman would have been behind bars by now.
 
If Martin was slamming this guys head into the ground with enough force to crack skulls, and make Zimmerman think he was gonna die, there would have been DNA under the nails.

Not if Martins fingernails were cut or gnawed below the tips.

THE ME testified TM's hands were not properly protected either to preserve the evidence from the elements.

They got plenty of genetic material from Martin's fingernails.

And you are introducing some more bullshit no one has testified too. He didn't "gnaw" them below the tips.
 
so Blacks believe they have the right to defend themselves in a life/death struggle, but White Hispanics don't? just lay on the pavement and let the villain beat u to death? right ??

15 seconds after Zimmerman shot Martin, the police arrived.

So?

Zimmerman knew they were coming.

After he bagged his prey, he instructed the first guy he talked too, not to call 911..because he had already done so.
 
They got plenty of genetic material from Martin's fingernails.

And you are introducing some more bullshit no one has testified too. He didn't "gnaw" them below the tips.


Link ?

There are no pictures of his nails or hands and no cuttings of his nails.

No one from ME could testify to the length of nails.
 
[

First he wasnt a child, the fact that you continue to call him one shows your bias.

I love it when Liberal progressives are so concerned with children,,,,until they want to abort them. :cuckoo:

Fetuses aren't children.

Never heard a woman who had an abortion ever refer to it as a child or a baby.

It was "that thing I need to take care of".

Trayvon was someone's child. He wasn't breaking any laws, he was unarmed, he was a minor and he did nothing to deserve being shot in the middle of the street by a cop wannabe.

If it has a heartbeat it is a child. Women that willing abort for convience prolly avoid the "child" label. They might not feel comfortable killing "it" if it has a human label.

Well you seem comfortable with Zimmerman putting a bullet in Martin's heart.
 
They got plenty of genetic material from Martin's fingernails.

And you are introducing some more bullshit no one has testified too. He didn't "gnaw" them below the tips.


Link ?

There are no pictures of his nails or hands and no cuttings of his nails.

No one from ME could testify to the length of nails.

Link to what?

No one testified Martin gnawed his fingernails.

No one.

And they did testify they got material out of them.
 
Zimmerman could have been dead in 15 seconds. In fact he would have been had he not shot Trayvon.

Nothing indicates that.

Absolutely nothing.

Nothing has to indicate it.

Did he fear for his life or great bodily harm ?

Answer = Yes.

He was so "fearful" that he was able to calmly direct the first people on the scene to help restrain a dead kid.

Martin was acting as if had just squashed a bug...not been in a life and death struggle.
 

Forum List

Back
Top