Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.
My main question in this story is why both Obama and Clinton continued to blame the producer of that goofy movie long after (it appears) they knew that argument simply was not true.
What's the spin on that?
.
Produce the timeline that shows that this is the case. Required will be evidence of when they knew that the attack was not part of the chain of demonstrations in reaction to the video. Then, you will have to show them giving the erroneous info after that point.
You even qualified your comment with "it appears". Why would you do that AND STILL demand an explaination as though you have your mind made up?
Opinion: Obama has explaining to do on Benghazi - CNN.comBut at Wednesday's hearing, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-South Carolina, quoted what he said was an internal e-mail dated the day after the attack in which Assistant Secretary of State Beth Jones told the Libyan ambassador that Islamic group Ansar al-Sharia was responsible for the attack.
.
My main question in this story is why both Obama and Clinton continued to blame the producer of that goofy movie long after (it appears) they knew that argument simply was not true.
What's the spin on that?
.
Produce the timeline that shows that this is the case. Required will be evidence of when they knew that the attack was not part of the chain of demonstrations in reaction to the video. Then, you will have to show them giving the erroneous info after that point.
You even qualified your comment with "it appears". Why would you do that AND STILL demand an explaination as though you have your mind made up?
i like how dems support obama's lies that put the producer's life at risk
obama blames some obscure producer and draws the wrath of the world down upon this guy and the dems are like....what are the pubs complaining about? lies are ok so long as a dem does it
fucking hacks
It is hard for rationale people to understand this, but many of his worshipers sincerely believed that he embodied a Second Coming in politics, i.e., that he was a transcendent figure who would usher in a new era peace, prosperity, transparency, non-partisanship, etc. All this from a Chicago politician!
It will be interesting to see how long they can bitterly cling to their pipe dream while the walls of reality come crashing down. Some will prefer utter destruction to any acknowledgment that they have been duped.
No one is "clinging" to anything. The administration got it wrong. There was good reasons for it as well.
What no one is buying is what you folks are trying to portray it as..
At the end of the 9/11 commission, the recommendations were to create the Department of Homeland Security. That's different then what you folks are recommending. Which is to remove the President from office.
.
My main question in this story is why both Obama and Clinton continued to blame the producer of that goofy movie long after (it appears) they knew that argument simply was not true.
What's the spin on that?
.
Produce the timeline that shows that this is the case. Required will be evidence of when they knew that the attack was not part of the chain of demonstrations in reaction to the video. Then, you will have to show them giving the erroneous info after that point.
You even qualified your comment with "it appears". Why would you do that AND STILL demand an explaination as though you have your mind made up?
You'll be the judge, right? Seriously?
.
My main question in this story is why both Obama and Clinton continued to blame the producer of that goofy movie long after (it appears) they knew that argument simply was not true.
What's the spin on that?
.
Produce the timeline that shows that this is the case. Required will be evidence of when they knew that the attack was not part of the chain of demonstrations in reaction to the video. Then, you will have to show them giving the erroneous info after that point.
You even qualified your comment with "it appears". Why would you do that AND STILL demand an explaination as though you have your mind made up?
Read up, prettyboy
Doug Ross @ Journal: DAMNING: The Complete Benghazi Timeline in Spreadsheet Format
MSNBC admits coverup? Was the network involved?
Look, there probably was some type of damage control going on. There always is. The Obama admin isn't the first and won't be the last.
So, they're guilty of trying keep the incident from being used as a political weapon -- which is exactly what the raving lunatics on the right are doing with it.
Their biggest mistake was in not realizing that the rabid nuts in the GOP (most of them now) would desperately try to use this against them no matter what.
Damage control is what is being done now, in an attempt to downplay the cover-up that is unraveling now.
This administration, starting with the President and continuing down the chain, deliberately lied to the American people for the purpose of political gain during an election, about an enemy attack on American diplomats. That was not damage control, it was malfeasance in office.
Why is it that none of the nutters on the oversight committee has accused Obama of lying about anything? Do you know more than they do? Have you more to gain by catching him lying than they do?
.
My main question in this story is why both Obama and Clinton continued to blame the producer of that goofy movie long after (it appears) they knew that argument simply was not true.
What's the spin on that?
.
Produce the timeline that shows that this is the case. Required will be evidence of when they knew that the attack was not part of the chain of demonstrations in reaction to the video. Then, you will have to show them giving the erroneous info after that point.
You even qualified your comment with "it appears". Why would you do that AND STILL demand an explaination as though you have your mind made up?
"Produce the timeline.."
Produce to who, you?
"Required will be evidence..."
Required by who, you?
"Why would you do that AND STILL demand an explanation..."
Yikes, you are certainly reading a great deal into my question. I'd like to know why they blamed the filmmaker. I don't know why they did that. Maybe they thought that, despite evidence to the contrary. If I knew, I wouldn't be asking. I'm not "demanding" anything. That's why I added the qualifier "it appears". See, I don't know, and neither my ego nor some partisan ideology requires me to pretend that I do.
Calm down. If you don't have an answer to my direct question, just say so.
.
Produce the timeline that shows that this is the case. Required will be evidence of when they knew that the attack was not part of the chain of demonstrations in reaction to the video. Then, you will have to show them giving the erroneous info after that point.
You even qualified your comment with "it appears". Why would you do that AND STILL demand an explaination as though you have your mind made up?
Read up, prettyboy
Doug Ross @ Journal: DAMNING: The Complete Benghazi Timeline in Spreadsheet Format
You have a very low bar for what constitutes evidence, ugly boy. I asked for some proof. Got any poof?
You have a very low bar for what constitutes evidence, ugly boy. I asked for some proof. Got any poof?
So according to this, Obama, Rice & Carney were all blaming the video from Sept 13 through Sept 25.
So, I'll ask again: Why is that?
.
i like how dems support obama's lies that put the producer's life at risk
obama blames some obscure producer and draws the wrath of the world down upon this guy and the dems are like....what are the pubs complaining about? lies are ok so long as a dem does it
fucking hacks
What lies?
By the way, "the producer", broke the law.
Anti-Muslim filmmaker sentenced to one year for probation violation - CBS News
Video: MSNBC Turns on Obama, Admits Benghazi Cover-Up
I know this is first time I have seen them criticize him
But let's face--there isn't anyone alive today that paid any attention to Bengazi in October--that didn't know this was a cover up from the get go-including (MSNBC and all the other media outlets.) Even BBC--ABC--and CBS are on the warpath over this. They got Obama reelected by ignoring this and now that he is firmly into his second term--they bring out the WMD. 
i like how dems support obama's lies that put the producer's life at risk
obama blames some obscure producer and draws the wrath of the world down upon this guy and the dems are like....what are the pubs complaining about? lies are ok so long as a dem does it
fucking hacks
What lies?
By the way, "the producer", broke the law.
Anti-Muslim filmmaker sentenced to one year for probation violation - CBS News
Video: MSNBC Turns on Obama, Admits Benghazi Cover-Up
I know this is first time I have seen them criticize him
Their ratings must have dropped into negative territory to do that---
We have sworn congressional testimony from Susan Rice--Hillary Clinton--David Patreaous--and Leon Panneta--all who lied under oath. I imagine it will be Hillary Clinton who gets run over with the steam roller on this one. Whether she is going to lye down and take it is the question. Obviously someone higher up the chain put out the talking points--and they with their midget brains followed along with the strategy.
It's very unfortunate that 4 people are dead over this--and now many careers will be destroyed along with reputations--over something so STUPID. All they had to do was admit it was a terrorist attack from the onset--and send in the troops to help out those in danger--versus giving a stand down order. Instead for political expediency they wanted to give the "illusion" that the world and especially Libya was free from terrorism after the death of Bin Laden and an election was soon coming.
And this is where this incident is very much like Watergate. Everyone is lying today as they were during the Nixon administration. Nixon---it was sections of an audio tapes that were deleted--and now it's emails--with several references to the danger in Lybia--terrorism and other things that have been deleted--and for nothing more than political reasons.
How far this goes--no one knows?
Video: MSNBC Turns on Obama, Admits Benghazi Cover-Up
I know this is first time I have seen them criticize him
i like how dems support obama's lies that put the producer's life at risk
obama blames some obscure producer and draws the wrath of the world down upon this guy and the dems are like....what are the pubs complaining about? lies are ok so long as a dem does it
fucking hacks
What lies?
By the way, "the producer", broke the law.
Anti-Muslim filmmaker sentenced to one year for probation violation - CBS News
Yes, the producer did break the law. He still didn't have anything to do with causing those attacks though. Why is he even still in jail? We hear nothing about him now....
And you're asking "what lies"???? Really? The blaming on the video wasn't one?
He is in jail because his video offended Obama. Think about it.i like how dems support obama's lies that put the producer's life at risk
obama blames some obscure producer and draws the wrath of the world down upon this guy and the dems are like....what are the pubs complaining about? lies are ok so long as a dem does it
fucking hacks
What lies?
By the way, "the producer", broke the law.
Anti-Muslim filmmaker sentenced to one year for probation violation - CBS News
Yes, the producer did break the law. He still didn't have anything to do with causing those attacks though. Why is he even still in jail? We hear nothing about him now....
And you're asking "what lies"???? Really? The blaming on the video wasn't one?
