Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What an "indictment means" is that a prosecutor went before a grand jury, presented evidence, without any defensive representation or presence, and convinced a majority of said jury that there was evidence to warrant a trial.Special counsel Robert Mueller has brought charges against 13 Russian nationals and three Russian groups for interfering with the 2016 U.S. elections, the Department of Justice announced Friday.
"Defendants' operations included supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump ("Trump campaign") and disparaging Hillary Clinton," the indictment reads.
"Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities."
Mueller indicts 13 Russians for interfering in US electionFull indictment is here: Mueller indicts Russian hackers—read the full court documents here."Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities."
And this is an indictment, which means the case has to have a far higher standard of proof and probative evidence of the meddling, subterfuge, etc.
- St. Petersburg firm Internet Research Agency (IRA)
- IRA closely connected to Putin
- Millions of dollars spent to "mess with" the U.S. 2016 election on Trump's behalf.
But the most important thing is this: what the USIC had been telling us was most definitely not a hoax; the POTUS' own justice department is not going to file hoax indictments in criminal courts of law. The defendants may or may not be found guilty, they may or may not "cop pleas," but whatever the outcome, there's no way around the reality that the evidence of meddling is far more meritorious than mere "he said, she said" of political rhetoric.
What remains to be seen is what Trump knew about this meddling and what was the nature of his and his team's involvement in and/or complicity with the meddling.
Special counsel Robert Mueller has brought charges against 13 Russian nationals and three Russian groups for interfering with the 2016 U.S. elections, the Department of Justice announced Friday.
"Defendants' operations included supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump ("Trump campaign") and disparaging Hillary Clinton," the indictment reads.
"Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities."
Mueller indicts 13 Russians for interfering in US electionFull indictment is here: Mueller indicts Russian hackers—read the full court documents here."Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities."
And this is an indictment, which means the case has to have a far higher standard of proof and probative evidence of the meddling, subterfuge, etc.
- St. Petersburg firm Internet Research Agency (IRA)
- IRA closely connected to Putin
- Millions of dollars spent to "mess with" the U.S. 2016 election on Trump's behalf.
But the most important thing is this: what the USIC had been telling us was most definitely not a hoax; the POTUS' own justice department is not going to file hoax indictments in criminal courts of law. The defendants may or may not be found guilty, they may or may not "cop pleas," but whatever the outcome, there's no way around the reality that the evidence of meddling is far more meritorious than mere "he said, she said" of political rhetoric.
What remains to be seen is what Trump knew about this meddling and what was the nature of his and his team's involvement in and/or complicity with the meddling.
Did you miss the part that there was no evidence of collusion by "any" American.Breaking just now, more will surly follow.
Eat that Orange Turd!
You know what money laundering I am far more concerned with?You could look at the money laundering.Where is the Russian Collusion?
Or just when Trump asked for the russians to help on live TV.
Breaking just now, more will surly follow.
Eat that Orange Turd!
Say cause and effect challenged liberals, how did you come to the conclusion this is linked to Trump?
Answer, typical emotional response. Reality is what you want it to be.
Breaking just now, more will surly follow.
Eat that Orange Turd!
Say cause and effect challenged liberals, how did you come to the conclusion this is linked to Trump?
Answer, typical emotional response. Reality is what you want it to be.
it's a long read, so you might be challenged trying to enlighten yourself, but stick with it or stay poorly educated like president dotard wants you to be:
The definitive Trump-Russia timeline of events
Follow our timeline of events on the Trump administration's ties to Russia.
By MATTHEW NUSSBAUM
03/03/2017 07:30 PM EST
Updated 12/01/2017 03:48 PM EST
The definitive Trump-Russia timeline of events
That would explain why Barron has been under wraps for so long. Trump thought we'd forget he existed.Aha, now we find out that Barron Trump was the contact between the campaign and the Russians. I knew it!BANNON, Old Rocks, NOT BARRON. I had to Google it. I couldn't figure out how Mueller managed to interview the kid but not the father.On the contrary. Rosenstein was very careful to state that "There is no allegation of any American's involvement in this indictment". Very open ended statement. Plus now Gates has turned, and Barron answered questions from Mueller's people for 20 hours, answered all questions. I think that this investigation has a long ways to go yet.If it means there has been no collusion, we must be close to the end of this investigation, right? Sounds like the end.
Trump is so sleazy he almost figured out how to collude with the Russians without being discovered!
Seriously. If you're going to make a claim, back it up.Breaking just now, more will surly follow.
Eat that Orange Turd!Seriously? LMGTFY
Is Fox not covering the indictment? It's "all over" the news channels I've looked at and it's "all over" the Internet.As I wrote: Seriously?OP posted a claim, I asked for a link to back up that claim. Too hard for you to understand? Not my job to do the OP's work.
Do you think the news that Mueller filed indictments against 13 Russians accusing them of having meddled in the 2016 election would be something that is (1) made up and (2) that looking at any news site, listening to any news radio show, or watching any news program would not be talking about?
How lazy are you? I could see the merit of your request were the OP-er to have remarked about some esoteric sh*t, but those indictments absolutely are not even close to such.
On the contrary. Rosenstein was very careful to state that "There is no allegation of any American's involvement in this indictment". Very open ended statement. Plus now Gates has turned, and Barron answered questions from Mueller's people for 20 hours, answered all questions. I think that this investigation has a long ways to go yet.If it means there has been no collusion, we must be close to the end of this investigation, right? Sounds like the end.
Once again, Trump wins
#MAGA
-Geaux
Seriously. If you're going to make a claim, back it up.Breaking just now, more will surly follow.
Eat that Orange Turd!Seriously? LMGTFY
Is Fox not covering the indictment? It's "all over" the news channels I've looked at and it's "all over" the Internet.As I wrote: Seriously?OP posted a claim, I asked for a link to back up that claim. Too hard for you to understand? Not my job to do the OP's work.
Do you think the news that Mueller filed indictments against 13 Russians accusing them of having meddled in the 2016 election would be something that is (1) made up and (2) that looking at any news site, listening to any news radio show, or watching any news program would not be talking about?
How lazy are you? I could see the merit of your request were the OP-er to have remarked about some esoteric sh*t, but those indictments absolutely are not even close to such.
Breaking just now, more will surly follow.
Eat that Orange Turd!
This was Russia, just as England and other nations interfere.
WHAT THE FUCK?
Did you just make this up or you have a specific incident of England's government conducting illegal operations to interfere in our election?
Yes, of course. If you think a former mi6 agent named Steele who created the dossier to go after Trump, or that he met with McCain in Canada is all just some "concerned anti-Trumper", you're very naive. If this is so, you have an extradition agreement with England.
Fiendishly clever of Trump, eh? Thinking that no one would expect his 12-year old son would be his contact with the Ruskies and all.That would explain why Barron has been under wraps for so long. Trump thought we'd forget he existed.Aha, now we find out that Barron Trump was the contact between the campaign and the Russians. I knew it!BANNON, Old Rocks, NOT BARRON. I had to Google it. I couldn't figure out how Mueller managed to interview the kid but not the father.On the contrary. Rosenstein was very careful to state that "There is no allegation of any American's involvement in this indictment". Very open ended statement. Plus now Gates has turned, and Barron answered questions from Mueller's people for 20 hours, answered all questions. I think that this investigation has a long ways to go yet.If it means there has been no collusion, we must be close to the end of this investigation, right? Sounds like the end.
Trump is so sleazy he almost figured out how to collude with the Russians without being discovered!
YOU party animal did the damage leading to daily systemic rot.You all for that, FCT?From the CNBC link.....
Alone, the ads don't appear to look much different from what you're probably used to seeing on Facebook. But the contradictory messages across them suggest the Russian government was trying to exacerbate political divisions in the U.S. population.
"exacerbating political divisions" is NOT meddling in an election. It favors neither side. It just pours GAS on our OWN fires and EXISTING divisions..
They had no right to do that. Don't let them do anymore money laundering in Manhattan. That oughta fix 'em.
The old Kremlin guard has a grudge. WE (our country) noticed the cracks in the Soviet Union developing and WE did the same to them. Didn't CAUSE the collapse of the Soviet Union -- we just gently PUSHED public opinion to LOSE FAITH in their leadership.. It's a grudge match.
Putin could NEVER collapse the American political system without MASSIVE HELP from the partisan warriors themselves. YOU party animal did the damage leading to daily systemic rot. Putin didn't do that. He just wants shits and giggles "HELPING" you to kill my country..
