Mueller told Barr his memo failed to fully capture "context/nature/substance" of Mueller's probe

[the other mike]

Per Washington Post. Being reported on CNN. Link below.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III expressed his concerns in a letter to William P. Barr after the attorney general publicized Mueller's principal conclusions. Mueller also pressed Barr in a phone call to release executive summaries of his report.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

At the time the letter was sent on March 27, Barr had announced that Mueller had not found a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Barr also said Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge.

Days after Barr’s announcement, Mueller wrote a previously unknown private letter to the Justice Department, which revealed a degree of dissatisfaction with the public discussion of Mueller’s work that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.

More: Mueller complained to Barr that memo did not capture ‘context’ of probe

Good for Mueller speaking out about his report being twisted by Barr.

 

[IM2]

Go Mueller!

If that's what you hope is going to happen, you will be disappointed. Mueller is motivated by nothing other than protecting the Constitution and the institutions it creates and sustains, I strongly believe. That includes the office of the president, and also the DoJ, even while he might despise the current office holders. So, he might explain his report in public testimony, but he will not be an attack dog. No way, no how.

He doesn't have to be an attack dog. Him stating the facts will suffice.

Not based on the rabid things I hear from the haters. If he falls to give them Trump's head on a platter, they'll insist he's lying.

The rabid haters are you Trump people. That's why you're still demanding investigations about nothing. The facts puts Trumps head on a platter and what you guys refuse to believe, as with everything else, is that your version of things are not how things actually are.

Emotions overcoming intelligence, it’s their national platform.

That's rich coming from the "lock her up

The full letter has been released...... and sorry to the OP and other sheep.... it clearly shows the media totally mischaracterized the letter.
He said no such thing.

No it does not. Muellers words are plain.

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

 

[Cellblock2429]

Per Washington Post. Being reported on CNN. Link below.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III expressed his concerns in a letter to William P. Barr after the attorney general publicized Mueller's principal conclusions. Mueller also pressed Barr in a phone call to release executive summaries of his report.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

At the time the letter was sent on March 27, Barr had announced that Mueller had not found a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Barr also said Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge.

Days after Barr’s announcement, Mueller wrote a previously unknown private letter to the Justice Department, which revealed a degree of dissatisfaction with the public discussion of Mueller’s work that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.

More: Mueller complained to Barr that memo did not capture ‘context’ of probe

Good for Mueller speaking out about his report being twisted by Barr.

/——/ Remember when democRATs demanded Barr release the inredacted report? Well, he did and guess what folks: Just 2 lawmakers have seen less-redacted Mueller report

 

[WEATHER53]

Mueller thinks Barr is suppose to peruse his report like a fine wine to capture its essence.

 

[MarcATL]

The good news is that Mueller's going to be brought to Congress next week.

I can't wait to hear it from the horses mouth.

...finally.

 

[jc456]

Its Barr's report. Mueller works for Barr. WTF is Mueller whining about, if he wanted to be more specific he knows how to write. The answer is "No collusion, no obstruction".
If the dems want to impeach, go for it, otherwise STFU already.

Barr does not have any authority to CHANGE Special Counsel Mueller's final report. Therefore, Barr has no authority to LIE about it.

how did he do that? I thought he sent it to congress. didn't he? are you saying Barr rewrote it? girl, don't you ever use logic when you react? really, I mean, how fking stupid are you?

 

[jc456]

“After the Attorney General received Special Counsel Mueller’s letter, he called him to discuss it,” a Justice Department spokeswoman said Tuesday. “In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel’s obstruction analysis. They then discussed whether additional context from the report would be helpful and could be quickly released.

Yep, Barr certainly omitted the "context, nature, and substance".

He gave them the entire report. you've lost your fking mind.

 

[jc456]

If that's what you hope is going to happen, you will be disappointed. Mueller is motivated by nothing other than protecting the Constitution and the institutions it creates and sustains, I strongly believe. That includes the office of the president, and also the DoJ, even while he might despise the current office holders. So, he might explain his report in public testimony, but he will not be an attack dog. No way, no how.

He doesn't have to be an attack dog. Him stating the facts will suffice.

Not based on the rabid things I hear from the haters. If he falls to give them Trump's head on a platter, they'll insist he's lying.

The rabid haters are you Trump people. That's why you're still demanding investigations about nothing. The facts puts Trumps head on a platter and what you guys refuse to believe, as with everything else, is that your version of things are not how things actually are.

Emotions overcoming intelligence, it’s their national platform.

That's rich coming from the "lock her up

The full letter has been released...... and sorry to the OP and other sheep.... it clearly shows the media totally mischaracterized the letter.
He said no such thing.

No it does not. Muellers words are plain.

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

well mr. mueller, why no sealed indictments then? it seems he did characterize it correctly. what did Barr miss? there you go, go ask him those questions.

 

[the other mike]

Reality check from Senator Graham...

 

[Cellblock2429]

The good news is that Mueller's going to be brought to Congress next week.

I can't wait to hear it from the horses mouth.

...finally.

/—-/ And if Mueller sticks to his guns will you Libs finally give it up?

 

[MarcATL]

/—-/ And if Mueller sticks to his guns will you Libs finally give it up?

What guns do you think he's sticking to?

 

[Lakhota]

BARR OFF THE RAILS — DEMS DEMAND: ‘RESIGN!’

I agree!

 

[Lakhota]

James Comey To William Barr: Trump ‘Has Eaten Your Soul’

Comey is an obnoxious asshole - but he's right about that.

 

[Lakhota]

“[Barr] absolutely needs to go,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) told CNN, “and then he can apply to be White House press secretary where he can lie all he wants.”

Democrats Assail William Barr After Mueller Letter

"[Barr] absolutely needs to go, and then he can apply to be White House press secretary where he can lie all he wants.”

Amen! I totally agree! Baghdad Bill would make Trump a good Press Secretary.

 

[Norman]

Should have read no collusion, no obstruction with big letters obviously.

Some idiots just refuse to get what the investigation found out, which is that.

 

[WEATHER53]

The good news is that Mueller's going to be brought to Congress next week.

I can't wait to hear it from the horses mouth.

...finally.

/—-/ And if Mueller sticks to his guns will you Libs finally give it up?

Of course not. They will anonymous source that Mueller is being blackmailed. One thing we must remember is that Democrats do NOT want a conclusion nor resolution. They want an endless fly swarm buzzing around Trump to reduce the effectiveness of his Presidency.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Per Washington Post. Being reported on CNN. Link below.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III expressed his concerns in a letter to William P. Barr after the attorney general publicized Mueller's principal conclusions. Mueller also pressed Barr in a phone call to release executive summaries of his report.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

At the time the letter was sent on March 27, Barr had announced that Mueller had not found a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Barr also said Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge.

Days after Barr’s announcement, Mueller wrote a previously unknown private letter to the Justice Department, which revealed a degree of dissatisfaction with the public discussion of Mueller’s work that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.

More: Mueller complained to Barr that memo did not capture ‘context’ of probe

Good for Mueller speaking out about his report being twisted by Barr.

/——/ Mueller was complaining about the media coverage of his report, not the Barr summary.

 

[WEATHER53]

Per Washington Post. Being reported on CNN. Link below.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III expressed his concerns in a letter to William P. Barr after the attorney general publicized Mueller's principal conclusions. Mueller also pressed Barr in a phone call to release executive summaries of his report.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

At the time the letter was sent on March 27, Barr had announced that Mueller had not found a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Barr also said Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge.

Days after Barr’s announcement, Mueller wrote a previously unknown private letter to the Justice Department, which revealed a degree of dissatisfaction with the public discussion of Mueller’s work that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.

More: Mueller complained to Barr that memo did not capture ‘context’ of probe

Good for Mueller speaking out about his report being twisted by Barr.

/——/ Mueller was complaining about the media coverage of his report, not the Barr summary.

Oh well that might be a different thing but more mileage is achieved from the lie

 

[Lakhota]

Trump and Barr are setting tyrannical precedents for future presidents. Therefore, Republicans cannot complain if we end up with a tyrannical Democratic president in the future. What goes around comes around.

 

[MarcATL]

/——/ Mueller was complaining about the media coverage of his report, not the Barr summary.

Say WHAT!?!?!