Mueller told Barr his memo failed to fully capture "context/nature/substance" of Mueller's probe

And HOW is the little fat slobbering idiot from NY going to handle this?

224599.png
 
This is nothing more than an attempt to undercut Barr's testimony. It is pathetic and will make the left look like fools in the end once again.
 
OP is spreading fake news, ironically Mueller said the news coverage falsely stated the report and about what the investigation was, not Barr.
So what does the OP do? Misstates What Mueller said which is exactly what he complained about. -oops Once again egg on your face.
 
The left is in full melt down mode...

This is rich.... The WP misrepresented the letter and the investigation. Now they have been caught lying... This implosion is going to be fun to watch.

Now they get to wear the shit they spread.View attachment 258744

You're wrong. And you are going to learn it the hard way.
 
Mueller did not seek an indictment: CASE CLOSED!

Stupid Russian. What part of the DOJ policy will not allow them to indict a sitting President do you fools not understand?

Mueller was NEVER going to indict Trump. It's up to Congress to impeach him.

It's not over. The Report was just the beginning of impeachment.
The DeathRATS were given the report. Only thing held back was GRAND JURY TESTIMONY WHICH IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE WITHHELD IF THE SUBJECT OF THAT TESTIMONY WAS NOT INDICTED!

WHAT DON'T YOU MORONS UNDERSTAND?
 
Poor right wingers. Look at all the desperation.
 
Mueller did not seek an indictment: CASE CLOSED!
Because he/Mueller could NOT seek an indictment while the president is seated, according to the Justice Dept rules,

it is up to Congress to seek articles of impeachment...

and if they do not, when the president is out of office, indictments can be sought and brought then...

Mueller said he investigated the obstruction of justice now even though the president could not be indicted, while memories were fresh and evidence gather-able, for prosecutors to use later or congress to use now....

Pres. Clinton, although not convicted in his impeachment trial, was facing prosecution in a court of law after he was out of office...

he worked a plea deal with the prosecutors the day before he left office, so that he would not be charged... things like law license revoked for 5 years, no supreme court lawyering for Bill etc...
 
Mueller is reportedly willing to testify before Congress - but the DOJ refuses to set a date. However, Mueller is still a DOJ employee. His employment will soon end - then he can testify before Congress without DOJ approval.
 
Mueller is reportedly willing to testify before Congress - but the DOJ refuses to set a date. However, Mueller is still a DOJ employee. His employment will soon end - then he can testify before Congress without DOJ approval.

Mueller stated that Barr's letter was accurate and not misleading. What's the problem?
 
Mueller is reportedly willing to testify before Congress - but the DOJ refuses to set a date. However, Mueller is still a DOJ employee. His employment will soon end - then he can testify before Congress without DOJ approval.

Mueller stated that Barr's letter was accurate and not misleading. What's the problem?

Do you pick cherries for a living? Mueller's letter to Barr will soon be public - then try spinning it.
 
Mueller is reportedly willing to testify before Congress - but the DOJ refuses to set a date. However, Mueller is still a DOJ employee. His employment will soon end - then he can testify before Congress without DOJ approval.

Mueller stated that Barr's letter was accurate and not misleading. What's the problem?

Mueller said it, not me. You guys are dreaming.
 
Mueller stated that Barr's letter was accurate and not misleading. What's the problem?


Give it a rest.....or cite EXACTLY Mueller's spoken or written statement on what you've been harping for the last couple of hours......or, of course, go to bed.
 
Mueller is reportedly willing to testify before Congress - but the DOJ refuses to set a date. However, Mueller is still a DOJ employee. His employment will soon end - then he can testify before Congress without DOJ approval.

Mueller stated that Barr's letter was accurate and not misleading. What's the problem?
The problem is these FUCKING IDIOTS ARE GRABBING AT STRAWS....When push comes to shove Trump does an EO and ends it...just like the Surrender Monkey did eith Holder in the murder case of the Fast & Furious!.....But it sure makes the Dimwits look like absolute morons and they are bleeding voters over this so GO DemonRATS!@@
 
Mueller is reportedly willing to testify before Congress - but the DOJ refuses to set a date. However, Mueller is still a DOJ employee. His employment will soon end - then he can testify before Congress without DOJ approval.

Mueller stated that Barr's letter was accurate and not misleading. What's the problem?

Do you pick cherries for a living? Mueller's letter to Barr will soon be public - then try spinning it.


I don't know how many victory laps Trump is gonna have to take before you guys see things for what they are. It's a waste of time to argue about this now. After this is debunked once again, we can start with whatever the next hoax is gonna be.
 
Mueller is reportedly willing to testify before Congress - but the DOJ refuses to set a date. However, Mueller is still a DOJ employee. His employment will soon end - then he can testify before Congress without DOJ approval.

Mueller stated that Barr's letter was accurate and not misleading. What's the problem?

But but but...we really wanted Trump to be indicted and impeached and his twitter account closed :206: why must we suffer the Trump why, why :206:
 
Mueller is reportedly willing to testify before Congress - but the DOJ refuses to set a date. However, Mueller is still a DOJ employee. His employment will soon end - then he can testify before Congress without DOJ approval.

Mueller stated that Barr's letter was accurate and not misleading. What's the problem?

Mueller said it, not me. You guys are dreaming.
LINK PLEASE.

:cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top