Mueller's Team Speaking to Reporters

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sebastian Gorka: too crazy for FOX

But smarter than any DEATHRAT. ...AND he tells the truth....something you scum would never do!

Da,comrade!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And know most of the public will not bother to look at the specifics, and their narrative that Barr missed something juicy remains.

Sure. Or maybe you're bending over backwards because you have to double down on a stupid point..

 

[Care4all]

Is it ethical (or legal) for Mueller's "team" to leak information to reporters without his consent? What does his "team" consist of anyway? Does it include clerks? It shows how the political affiliation of the "Mueller team" has always been the primary motivation..

it seems like it would not be legal, even though it is common day place.... FBI leaked daily, and it was reported on FOX on the FBI investigation in to the Hillary server, while the investigation was still on going! Which is definitely a real NO NO.

no one was fired or demoted or reprimanded for it...

and since justice is suppose to be blind, and equal justice for all... I doubt these new leakers, of an investigation, after an investigation ended, will be charged either, if it is breaking a law...

seems loosey goosey to me....

one exception for it not being wrong, may be whistle blowing... on our govt, for being intentionally dishonest to us... as long as they are not leaking top secret military stuff...

leaking to the press on our gvt's wrong doings, was what our founders created and codified in our constitution, with freedom of the press...

 

[The Purge]

Sebastian Gorka: too crazy for FOX

But smarter than any DEATHRAT. ...AND he tells the truth....something you scum would never do!

Da,comrade!

So YOU are a Russian spy!...WOW

 

[BluesLegend]

How many Mueller liberal butthurt threads is this now?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

This bullshit whitewashing by the democrats on Mueller's team reminds of this painting:

What you DON'T see (and imagine) seems more frightening than if you were able to see what is actually there.

.

 

[K9Buck]

Sebastian Gorka: too crazy for FOX

Gorka is correct. This is the greatest political scandal in the history of our nation. Naturally, you support the totalitarian actions of your leftist masters.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This bullshit whitewashing by the democrats on Mueller's team reminds of this painting:

I dont think you know what the term "whitewashing" means.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sebastian Gorka: too crazy for FOX

Gorka is correct. This is the greatest political scandal in the history of our nation. Naturally, you support the totalitarian actions of your leftist masters.

No, he's wrong, his idea is absurd and crazy, and I think you embarrass yourself to say such cultish things.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Sebastian Gorka: too crazy for FOX

Gorka is correct. This is the greatest political scandal in the history of our nation. Naturally, you support the totalitarian actions of your leftist masters.

It's not a far-fetched theory at all.

Obama scumbags thought Hillary would win and no one would question their serious privacy violations in spying on the Trump campaign. Then, Trump tweets about it...all hell breaks loose. Obama's cronies are putting serious pressure on Comey. He is paralyzed by the pressure, refuses to act on the information he get about this illegal spying, and gets himself fired. Mueller is appointed and his team works around the clock to keep the spying under wraps.

Very plausible.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

No, he's wrong, his idea is absurd and crazy, and I think you embarrass yourself to say such cultish things.

Why is it absurd and crazy?

What about that theory is impossible?

.

 

[Care4all]

Sebastian Gorka: too crazy for FOX

But smarter than any DEATHRAT. ...AND he tells the truth....something you scum would never do!

Da,comrade!

So YOU are a Russian spy!...WOW

YOU definitely are...! Or perhaps just their useful idiot?

 

[beagle9]

Looks like this is their main bitch:

"The report's second part addresses a number of actions by the President – most of which have been the subject of public reporting – that the Special Counsel investigated as potentially raising obstruction-of-justice concerns. After making a “thorough factual investigation” into these matters, the Special Counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department standards governing prosecution and declination decisions but ultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion - one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

"The Special Counsel's decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel's office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special Counsel's obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel's final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president."

Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report

So, Barr did not reach the conclusions they wanted on obstruction? That's it?




After saying these are difficult questions of law....bitch about Barr reaching conclusions they don't like?

..

We're done here.

...

Barr is not to be trusted with this.

Time for the public to see both the Mueller Report and Trump's tax records.

Democratic Party -controlled major committees in the House of Representatives are now demanding to see both.

In accordance with United States law, and the Constitution itself.

Unless Trump had committed a crime in which they have evidence of, then NO they can't just go snooping around in Trump's business in hopes to find a crime in which they have no evidence of. American's privacy and freedom is at stake in these situations, and Trump is no different than any of the other American's that have privacy rights, and has every other right that an American enjoys, and has in this country. Butt hurt is not a justification to go looking around in someone's private buisness in hopes to politically destroy a person for purely political reasons.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

This is great news! I've been listening to it on CNN and MSNBC.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Revealed

Why would it be great news ? You should only be happy when your president has done nothing wrong.


This is where we are now, where one side is ecstatic when their opposition does something wrong. We are now more concerned about our side, than we are about the country as a whole.

Absolutely sad, and absolutely sickening.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

This is great news! I've been listening to it on CNN and MSNBC.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Revealed

Why would it be great news ? You should only be happy when your president has done nothing wrong.


This is where we are now, where one side is ecstatic when their opposition does something wrong. We are now more concerned about our side, than we are about the country as a whole.

Absolutely sad, and absolutely sickening.

Which is why I say FUCK THIS SHITTY UNION. I want Texas independence.

.

 

[Papageorgio]

This is great news! I've been listening to it on CNN and MSNBC.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Revealed

So you are in favor of what is bad for the country. I always said you were party over country. You just proved it.

 

[Crixus]

Trumpers have said that Mueller team members would speak out if they thought that Barr wasn't being straight with the American people. Well now they are

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s team see their findings more damaging for Trump

Yup.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Given this news, Barr needs to resign..or at least recuse himself from the whole investigation

Isn't it to late for him to recuse himself now, his damage is done. As far As resigning you know that will never happen!

 

[rightwinger]

Looks like this is their main bitch:

"The report's second part addresses a number of actions by the President – most of which have been the subject of public reporting – that the Special Counsel investigated as potentially raising obstruction-of-justice concerns. After making a “thorough factual investigation” into these matters, the Special Counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department standards governing prosecution and declination decisions but ultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion - one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

"The Special Counsel's decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel's office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special Counsel's obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel's final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president."

Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report

So, Barr did not reach the conclusions they wanted on obstruction? That's it?




After saying these are difficult questions of law....bitch about Barr reaching conclusions they don't like?

..

We're done here.

...

Barr is not to be trusted with this.

Time for the public to see both the Mueller Report and Trump's tax records.

Democratic Party -controlled major committees in the House of Representatives are now demanding to see both.

In accordance with United States law, and the Constitution itself.

Unless Trump had committed a crime in which they have evidence of, then NO they can't just go snooping around in Trump's business in hopes to find a crime in which they have no evidence of. American's privacy and freedom is at stake in these situations, and Trump is no different than any of the other American's that have privacy rights, and has every other right that an American enjoys, and has in this country. Butt hurt is not a justification to go looking around in someone's private buisness in hopes to politically destroy a person for purely political reasons.

You seem to imply that you need a conviction before you can investigate

You have it backwards

 

[Crepitus]

Reading Cliff Notes ain’t the same as reading the novel.

Particularly when the guy writing the notes has an agenda.