Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But, not the 20 Democrats behind the report?Particularly when the guy writing the notes has an agenda.
We don't need to read a conclusion that was based on donors to the DNCTrumpers have said that Mueller team members would speak out if they thought that Barr wasn't being straight with the American people. Well now they are
WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.
NYT: Some on Mueller’s team see their findings more damaging for Trump
Any specifics? Any suggestions as to how Barr should have summarized it?Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated,
.
Read the article.
Does any grown up adult with an IQ above 75 really think that there can be 37 indictments, 6 people serving time and somehow Trump's hands are clean?
Really?
.
.
.
Based on what?Barr is not to be trusted with this.
Why don't these Mueller tools pipe up with specifics?
But, they CAN say SPECIFICALLY which items in Barr's summary are NOT true or misleading.They legally can’t say anything about what is in the report.
Lets play a game: which tRump appointees hasn't been a biased nut-job with an agenda?But, not the 20 Democrats behind the report?Particularly when the guy writing the notes has an agenda.
.
Based on what?Barr is not to be trusted with this.
Why don't these Mueller tools pipe up with specifics?
They legally can’t say anything about what is in the report.
But, they CAN say SPECIFICALLY which items in Barr's summary are NOT true or misleading.They legally can’t say anything about what is in the report.
They didn't say ANYTHING.
.
So?Lets play a game: which tRump appointees hasn't been a biased nut-job with an agenda?
Based on what?Barr is not to be trusted with this.
Why don't these Mueller tools pipe up with specifics?
They legally can’t say anything about what is in the report.
They can be forced to testify by congress on their report
Come on, you're smarter than this.So?Lets play a game: which tRump appointees hasn't been a biased nut-job with an agenda?
How is that relevant to the little shits ambiguously bitching about Barr's summary?
.
RidiculousBased on what?Barr is not to be trusted with this.
Why don't these Mueller tools pipe up with specifics?
They legally can’t say anything about what is in the report.
They can be forced to testify by congress on their report
They could be subpoenaed however everything they say, without the report would be hearsay.
This is true.Barr wrote in his 3.5 page summary that Mueller did NOT exonerate Trump.
Look it up.
It left it up to Barr and Rosenstein to make the call. They did. People bitched.
No, you're wrong.
Mueller left it up to Barr and Rosenstein to determine if there was obstruction of justice.
He did not leave it to Barr to determine exoneration.
Don't you ever tire of being up Trump's ass?
.
.
.
RidiculousBased on what?Barr is not to be trusted with this.
Why don't these Mueller tools pipe up with specifics?
They legally can’t say anything about what is in the report.
They can be forced to testify by congress on their report
They could be subpoenaed however everything they say, without the report would be hearsay.
They wrote the report
Uh huh...Trumpers have said that Mueller team members would speak out if they thought that Barr wasn't being straight with the American people. Well now they are
WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.
NYT: Some on Mueller’s team see their findings more damaging for Trump
Are you saying Barr lied?Come on, you're smarter than this.So?Lets play a game: which tRump appointees hasn't been a biased nut-job with an agenda?
How is that relevant to the little shits ambiguously bitching about Barr's summary?
.