JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
And the far right wails on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
6 million of them are seniors who retired. I suppose you're stupid enough to think retirement is bad?Your the idiot that thinks 8million people leaving the work force is a good thing.Leave it to a rightard to think 5.8% unemployment shows how bad the country is doing.Gotta love retards that use statistics that show how bad the country is doing as proof of how dumb they are. ROFL It's like having ferrets as pets.There is no net loss. There's a net gain (so far) of 5,131,000Actually - I can dismiss it as LIES after reading just a couple. Here's a prime example:Here is a list of 262 of President Obama’s accomplishments as President. Every one of them has a citation, so no one can dismiss these as lies.
Okay, now your turn.
Name even one thing the Repubs have done FOR the US.
Let me save you some time and typing.
The Repub have done NOT ONE FUCKING THING for the US.
"Oversaw the creation of more jobs in 2010 alone than Bush did in eight years."
Oh yeah - then why does he have a higher unemployment rate than GWB ever had? The libs love to crow that Obama "created 4 million jobs" but that's easy to do when you've lost 6 million jobs. He has a NET LOSS of jobs as president but the libs twist the facts (as they always do) and only talk about the jobs "created". If you have a net loss - you didn't "create" anything.
Thanks for playing LN - but this list is pure, unadulterated bullshit. The fact that the left has to consider a NET LOSS of jobs under Obama among his "accomplishments" kind of says it all.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
He doesn't. Current unemployment rate is 5.8%. Bush had a higher employment rate than that in 2002, most of 2003, and much of 2009.Oh yeah - then why does he have a higher unemployment rate than GWB ever had?
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
At this point in Reagan's presidency, unemployment was 7%. According to your idiocy, the country was doing far worse in 1986 than it is today.![]()
the man can't even call a terrorist a terrorist ! nothing this man has done has been a success .
Swap out "healthcare program" with "Iraq war" and it sounds like you're talking about George Bush.Obama's resume:
- Doubled the national debt
- Expanded fed gov power
- Spies on all Americans
- Enriched Wall Street
- Bailed out the TBF banks
- Enriched his cronies
- Intervened in several nations militarily
- Lied repeatedly about his signature big gov health program
- Promoted racial divisions
Apparently libs, progs, and Ds find this admirable.
Exactly. There is little difference between the two asshole statists. Glad we agree.Swap out "healthcare program" with "Iraq war" and it sounds like you're talking about George Bush.Obama's resume:
- Doubled the national debt
- Expanded fed gov power
- Spies on all Americans
- Enriched Wall Street
- Bailed out the TBF banks
- Enriched his cronies
- Intervened in several nations militarily
- Lied repeatedly about his signature big gov health program
- Promoted racial divisions
Apparently libs, progs, and Ds find this admirable.
6 million of them are seniors who retired. I suppose you're stupid enough to think retirement is bad?Your the idiot that thinks 8million people leaving the work force is a good thing.Leave it to a rightard to think 5.8% unemployment shows how bad the country is doing.Gotta love retards that use statistics that show how bad the country is doing as proof of how dumb they are. ROFL It's like having ferrets as pets.There is no net loss. There's a net gain (so far) of 5,131,000Actually - I can dismiss it as LIES after reading just a couple. Here's a prime example:
"Oversaw the creation of more jobs in 2010 alone than Bush did in eight years."
Oh yeah - then why does he have a higher unemployment rate than GWB ever had? The libs love to crow that Obama "created 4 million jobs" but that's easy to do when you've lost 6 million jobs. He has a NET LOSS of jobs as president but the libs twist the facts (as they always do) and only talk about the jobs "created". If you have a net loss - you didn't "create" anything.
Thanks for playing LN - but this list is pure, unadulterated bullshit. The fact that the left has to consider a NET LOSS of jobs under Obama among his "accomplishments" kind of says it all.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
He doesn't. Current unemployment rate is 5.8%. Bush had a higher employment rate than that in 2002, most of 2003, and much of 2009.Oh yeah - then why does he have a higher unemployment rate than GWB ever had?
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
At this point in Reagan's presidency, unemployment was 7%. According to your idiocy, the country was doing far worse in 1986 than it is today.![]()
![]()
Correct. Bush was a moderate socialist, not much better than Obama.Swap out "healthcare program" with "Iraq war" and it sounds like you're talking about George Bush.Obama's resume:
- Doubled the national debt
- Expanded fed gov power
- Spies on all Americans
- Enriched Wall Street
- Bailed out the TBF banks
- Enriched his cronies
- Intervened in several nations militarily
- Lied repeatedly about his signature big gov health program
- Promoted racial divisions
Apparently libs, progs, and Ds find this admirable.
the man can't even call a terrorist a terrorist ! nothing this man has done has been a success .
How many times did you vote for Bush?Exactly. There is little difference between the two asshole statists. Glad we agree.Swap out "healthcare program" with "Iraq war" and it sounds like you're talking about George Bush.Obama's resume:
- Doubled the national debt
- Expanded fed gov power
- Spies on all Americans
- Enriched Wall Street
- Bailed out the TBF banks
- Enriched his cronies
- Intervened in several nations militarily
- Lied repeatedly about his signature big gov health program
- Promoted racial divisions
Apparently libs, progs, and Ds find this admirable.
Correct. Bush was a moderate socialist, not much better than Obama.Swap out "healthcare program" with "Iraq war" and it sounds like you're talking about George Bush.Obama's resume:
- Doubled the national debt
- Expanded fed gov power
- Spies on all Americans
- Enriched Wall Street
- Bailed out the TBF banks
- Enriched his cronies
- Intervened in several nations militarily
- Lied repeatedly about his signature big gov health program
- Promoted racial divisions
Apparently libs, progs, and Ds find this admirable.
Which, in time....There's one good thing he did.
![]()
How many times did you vote for Bush?Exactly. There is little difference between the two asshole statists. Glad we agree.Swap out "healthcare program" with "Iraq war" and it sounds like you're talking about George Bush.Obama's resume:
- Doubled the national debt
- Expanded fed gov power
- Spies on all Americans
- Enriched Wall Street
- Bailed out the TBF banks
- Enriched his cronies
- Intervened in several nations militarily
- Lied repeatedly about his signature big gov health program
- Promoted racial divisions
Apparently libs, progs, and Ds find this admirable.
Nope, still nothing but your worthless opinion. Not saying you aren't entitled to an opinion ... just pointing out it's meaningless.Those are your "other" words. Meaningless, really.He got two Liberal justices on the U.S. Supreme Court.
In other words, he got to shit on America twice.
No, it's an accurate characterization of liberalism: a great big shit on America.