Sure, I can explain it. American citizens demanding honest government is not propaganda. Defending corrupt politicians and deflecting for them and attacking Americans who play by the rules is propaganda.
You are using the actual propaganda as it is defined to explain your rhetorical definition of what propaganda is. Your answer is propaganda. You are leaving it to yourself to determine what is factual and what is not. What is untruthful and what is not. You are allowing yourself to be the judge of truth or lies without review, insisting that you are the qualified judge of such matters and interpretations. Hence the truth becomes what you say it is. That is a definition of propaganda.
It is all irrelevant because Ted Nugent has a right to say whatever he wants and people have a right to say whatever they want about what Ted said. Doesn't matter if some people think Ted or his critics are using propaganda. Propaganda is just a dishonest way of marketing a thought, idea, concept, etc. If we were talking about a product we would call it false advertisement.
BTW, people have been demanding honest government forever. It has been a political topic ever since governments were created. Romans and Greeks discussed the need for honest government. Your ideas are not original, new or interesting.
Bullshit. I know how my government is supposed to work. You just proved my point. Thanks.
The whole point of politics is the differing opinions of how government is supposed to work. You are simply stating that you are the one who knows how government is supposed to work, and anyone with other ideas does not know how government is supposed to work. Are you seeing a pattern in your thought process yet?
Can you name a government, form of government, from anywhere in the world or any time in history that you can describe as "honest" or at least your interpretation or view of "honest government"?