defcon4
Platinum Member
- Jan 26, 2015
- 20,001
- 8,660
- 950
Prime example of war crimes. Nobody talks about that. Eisenhower purposefully starved and froze them to death. Reclassifying the status gave him the means to do just that. That's why surrendering is a risky decision. It is the biggest bullshit that the Allies didn't have food and water and shelter. Patton was a soldier and respected the enemy soldier what was a professional soldiers' honor. Maybe he objected the treatment of POW-s and that was one of the reasons he was assassinated among others of course. Fighting to death and taking as many with you as you possibly can maybe a better option considering starvation to death.Rheinwiesenlager - WikipediaI admit, I do not read Globalist propaganda regardless of typesetting. War crimes are always determined by the victor. Yes there were problems with human rights violations but Eisenhower starved to death countless POW-s also. Nobody mentions that.Could you post with larger type setting and bold letters please? Anyhow, what's wrong with people remembering their own ancestors? If WWII was right or wrong has nothing to with it.NeoNazi:
Björn Höcke, called in a speech in a Dresden beer hallfor a “180-degree turn” in Germany’s culture of commemorating and atoning for its crimes in the second world war.
When asked whether he condoned Höcke’s comments, Farage refused to comment, insisting that he was attending the rally on a “personal level” as a friend of Von Storch and had “no formal ties with the AfD”, even though the podium he was speaking on was adorned with the party’s logo.
Nothing about remembering, the article cites a NeoNazi that wants a complete end to atoning for German war crimes. Read, perhaps you need the type larger : )