NBC anchor denigrates those who believe in Noah's ark calls it fairy tales

[Asclepias]

The Yoruba people have a creation story that mentions a major flood. Its safe to say that none of them actually believe its true.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

(OPINION) CP – On last Sunday’s Meet the Press, NBC News anchor Chuck Todd read and endorsed a letter claiming that supporters of Donald Trump “want to be lied to” since they believe in “fairy tales” such as Noah’s ark.
NBC anchor denigrates those who believe in Noah's Ark, Calls it "fairy tales"



Because when you are a leftist cold-blooded moron what else do you expect these mentally clipped idiots to say.

It is a fairy tale, you retard.

 

[August West]

No, Democrats gave us Bill Clinton

Hey, I remember him. He was the guy that was a really good President but then went and screwed around with ladies not his wife. Republicans pretended to get all riled up over character back then, but they don't do that anymore.

He was investigated for losing thousands of dollars on a real estate deal aka a witch hunt. In any case it was a good 8 years.

 

[ph3iron]

(OPINION) CP – On last Sunday’s Meet the Press, NBC News anchor Chuck Todd read and endorsed a letter claiming that supporters of Donald Trump “want to be lied to” since they believe in “fairy tales” such as Noah’s ark.
NBC anchor denigrates those who believe in Noah's Ark, Calls it "fairy tales"



Because when you are a leftist cold-blooded moron what else do you expect these mentally clipped idiots to say.

You believe in it?
2 of everything in it?

 

[Crepitus]

I don't see the problem here.

Are you upset that Chuck doesn't buy into your sky-daddy fantasies?

Sky-daddy fantasies, huh?

The first five books of the Bible (known as the Torah) were recorded by Moses - an adopted son of the king of Egypt - in approximately 1400 B.C.. These five books focus on the beginning of the nation of Israel; but the first 11 chapters of the Torah records the history that all nations have in common. These allegorical accounts of the history of the world had been passed down from generation to generation orally for thousands of years. Moses did not really write the first 11 chapters of the Bible. Moses was the first Hebrew to record them.

Approximately 800 years before Moses recorded the allegorical accounts of the history of the world. The Chinese recorded this history as symbols in the Chinese language. They drew pictures to express words or ideas. Simple pictures were combined to make more complex thoughts. They used well known history and common everyday things to make a word so people could easily remember it. The account of Genesis found it's way into the Chinese written language because the Chinese had migrated from the cradle of civilization. Prior to this migration they all shared a common history and religion.

The Bible even explains how it was possible for the Chinese to record the account of Genesis 800 years before Moses recorded it. The account of the Tower of Babel was the allegorical account of the great migration from Mesopotamia. This also explains why all ancient cultures have an account of a great flood. Because they all shared a common history and religion before the great migration from the cradle of civilization.

So if you start from the belief that the first eleven chapters of the Torah are an allegorical account of world history before the great migration from Mesopotamia - which was an actual historical event - then the first eleven chapters of the Torah takes on new meaning. Seen in this light these accounts should be viewed less like fairy tales and more like how important information was passed down in ancient times. Just as the Chinese used well known history and everyday things as symbols in their written language to make words easier to remember, ancient man used stories to pass down historical events and important knowledge to future generations. Interspersed in these allegorical accounts of history are wisdoms that they deemed important enough to pass down and remember. Such as man knows right from wrong and when he violates it, rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong he rationalizes he didn't do wrong. Most people don't even realize this wisdom is in the Torah because they read it critically instead of searching for the wisdom that ancient man knew and found important enough to include in his account of world history.

You have to keep in mind that these accounts are at least 6,000 years old and were passed down orally from one generation to the next for thousands of years. Surely ancient man believed these accounts were of the utmost importance otherwise they would not have been passed down for thousands of years before they were recorded in writing. You shouldn't view these accounts using the context of the modern world. Unfortunately, you are so far removed from these events that we have lost all original meaning and you have made no effort whatsoever in trying to understand them. If you were to ask almost any Jew what the Tower of Babel was about he would have no clue that it was the allegorical account of the great migration from the cradle of civilization. That is not intended to be a criticism. It is intended to be an illustration of just how difficult a task it is to discover the original meaning from ancient accounts from 6,000 years ago. You read these texts like they were written yesterday looking for ways to discredit them and make yourself feel superior rather than seeking the original meaning and wisdom. Shame on you.

And I'm sure you believe all of that junk.

Sorry, but I don't buy it.

Yes. I even provided the reasons why.

You must be taking it on faith that what I wrote is wrong because you don't seem to be able to articulate the reasons why you believe what I wrote is wrong.

Because it's nonsense. The Chinese characters thing particularly. Some dude in Texas makes an assumption based on wishful thinking and you taken it as gospel(pun intended)?

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

 

[ph3iron]

(OPINION) CP – On last Sunday’s Meet the Press, NBC News anchor Chuck Todd read and endorsed a letter claiming that supporters of Donald Trump “want to be lied to” since they believe in “fairy tales” such as Noah’s ark.
NBC anchor denigrates those who believe in Noah's Ark, Calls it "fairy tales"



Because when you are a leftist cold-blooded moron what else do you expect these mentally clipped idiots to say.

Mindwars, say no more.
Another trump u graduate

 

[ph3iron]

Believing in Noah's Ark requires far less faith than the liberal's belief in Global Warming. ...

I missed where you got your PhD in science again.?

 

[ding]

Sky-daddy fantasies, huh?

The first five books of the Bible (known as the Torah) were recorded by Moses - an adopted son of the king of Egypt - in approximately 1400 B.C.. These five books focus on the beginning of the nation of Israel; but the first 11 chapters of the Torah records the history that all nations have in common. These allegorical accounts of the history of the world had been passed down from generation to generation orally for thousands of years. Moses did not really write the first 11 chapters of the Bible. Moses was the first Hebrew to record them.

Approximately 800 years before Moses recorded the allegorical accounts of the history of the world. The Chinese recorded this history as symbols in the Chinese language. They drew pictures to express words or ideas. Simple pictures were combined to make more complex thoughts. They used well known history and common everyday things to make a word so people could easily remember it. The account of Genesis found it's way into the Chinese written language because the Chinese had migrated from the cradle of civilization. Prior to this migration they all shared a common history and religion.

The Bible even explains how it was possible for the Chinese to record the account of Genesis 800 years before Moses recorded it. The account of the Tower of Babel was the allegorical account of the great migration from Mesopotamia. This also explains why all ancient cultures have an account of a great flood. Because they all shared a common history and religion before the great migration from the cradle of civilization.

So if you start from the belief that the first eleven chapters of the Torah are an allegorical account of world history before the great migration from Mesopotamia - which was an actual historical event - then the first eleven chapters of the Torah takes on new meaning. Seen in this light these accounts should be viewed less like fairy tales and more like how important information was passed down in ancient times. Just as the Chinese used well known history and everyday things as symbols in their written language to make words easier to remember, ancient man used stories to pass down historical events and important knowledge to future generations. Interspersed in these allegorical accounts of history are wisdoms that they deemed important enough to pass down and remember. Such as man knows right from wrong and when he violates it, rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong he rationalizes he didn't do wrong. Most people don't even realize this wisdom is in the Torah because they read it critically instead of searching for the wisdom that ancient man knew and found important enough to include in his account of world history.

You have to keep in mind that these accounts are at least 6,000 years old and were passed down orally from one generation to the next for thousands of years. Surely ancient man believed these accounts were of the utmost importance otherwise they would not have been passed down for thousands of years before they were recorded in writing. You shouldn't view these accounts using the context of the modern world. Unfortunately, you are so far removed from these events that we have lost all original meaning and you have made no effort whatsoever in trying to understand them. If you were to ask almost any Jew what the Tower of Babel was about he would have no clue that it was the allegorical account of the great migration from the cradle of civilization. That is not intended to be a criticism. It is intended to be an illustration of just how difficult a task it is to discover the original meaning from ancient accounts from 6,000 years ago. You read these texts like they were written yesterday looking for ways to discredit them and make yourself feel superior rather than seeking the original meaning and wisdom. Shame on you.

And I'm sure you believe all of that junk.

Sorry, but I don't buy it.

Yes. I even provided the reasons why.

You must be taking it on faith that what I wrote is wrong because you don't seem to be able to articulate the reasons why you believe what I wrote is wrong.

Because it's nonsense. The Chinese characters thing particularly. Some dude in Texas makes an assumption based on wishful thinking and you taken it as gospel(pun intended)?

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

Yes, looked them up for myself.

What leads me to believe the Chinese symbols has anything to do with the account of Genesis? You mean besides the border sacrifices the Chinese performed? And animal sacrifices? The symbols themselves. The story is literally being told as symbols. That's why they were used. Because they used everyday ordinary things that people knew and understood so that it would be easier to remember the meaning of the symbol/word.

 

[ding]

Sky-daddy fantasies, huh?

The first five books of the Bible (known as the Torah) were recorded by Moses - an adopted son of the king of Egypt - in approximately 1400 B.C.. These five books focus on the beginning of the nation of Israel; but the first 11 chapters of the Torah records the history that all nations have in common. These allegorical accounts of the history of the world had been passed down from generation to generation orally for thousands of years. Moses did not really write the first 11 chapters of the Bible. Moses was the first Hebrew to record them.

Approximately 800 years before Moses recorded the allegorical accounts of the history of the world. The Chinese recorded this history as symbols in the Chinese language. They drew pictures to express words or ideas. Simple pictures were combined to make more complex thoughts. They used well known history and common everyday things to make a word so people could easily remember it. The account of Genesis found it's way into the Chinese written language because the Chinese had migrated from the cradle of civilization. Prior to this migration they all shared a common history and religion.

The Bible even explains how it was possible for the Chinese to record the account of Genesis 800 years before Moses recorded it. The account of the Tower of Babel was the allegorical account of the great migration from Mesopotamia. This also explains why all ancient cultures have an account of a great flood. Because they all shared a common history and religion before the great migration from the cradle of civilization.

So if you start from the belief that the first eleven chapters of the Torah are an allegorical account of world history before the great migration from Mesopotamia - which was an actual historical event - then the first eleven chapters of the Torah takes on new meaning. Seen in this light these accounts should be viewed less like fairy tales and more like how important information was passed down in ancient times. Just as the Chinese used well known history and everyday things as symbols in their written language to make words easier to remember, ancient man used stories to pass down historical events and important knowledge to future generations. Interspersed in these allegorical accounts of history are wisdoms that they deemed important enough to pass down and remember. Such as man knows right from wrong and when he violates it, rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong he rationalizes he didn't do wrong. Most people don't even realize this wisdom is in the Torah because they read it critically instead of searching for the wisdom that ancient man knew and found important enough to include in his account of world history.

You have to keep in mind that these accounts are at least 6,000 years old and were passed down orally from one generation to the next for thousands of years. Surely ancient man believed these accounts were of the utmost importance otherwise they would not have been passed down for thousands of years before they were recorded in writing. You shouldn't view these accounts using the context of the modern world. Unfortunately, you are so far removed from these events that we have lost all original meaning and you have made no effort whatsoever in trying to understand them. If you were to ask almost any Jew what the Tower of Babel was about he would have no clue that it was the allegorical account of the great migration from the cradle of civilization. That is not intended to be a criticism. It is intended to be an illustration of just how difficult a task it is to discover the original meaning from ancient accounts from 6,000 years ago. You read these texts like they were written yesterday looking for ways to discredit them and make yourself feel superior rather than seeking the original meaning and wisdom. Shame on you.

And I'm sure you believe all of that junk.

Sorry, but I don't buy it.

Yes. I even provided the reasons why.

You must be taking it on faith that what I wrote is wrong because you don't seem to be able to articulate the reasons why you believe what I wrote is wrong.

Because it's nonsense. The Chinese characters thing particularly. Some dude in Texas makes an assumption based on wishful thinking and you taken it as gospel(pun intended)?

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

So as I continue to answer your questions, I can't help but notice you haven't presented any evidence for your beliefs. Why is that?

 

[Sunni Man]

Believing in Noah's Ark requires far less faith than the liberal's belief in Global Warming.

I missed where you got your PhD in science again.?

At the same place you got yours. ..

 

[Crepitus]

And I'm sure you believe all of that junk.

Sorry, but I don't buy it.

Yes. I even provided the reasons why.

You must be taking it on faith that what I wrote is wrong because you don't seem to be able to articulate the reasons why you believe what I wrote is wrong.

Because it's nonsense. The Chinese characters thing particularly. Some dude in Texas makes an assumption based on wishful thinking and you taken it as gospel(pun intended)?

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

Yes, looked them up for myself.

What leads me to believe the Chinese symbols has anything to do with the account of Genesis? You mean besides the border sacrifices the Chinese performed? And animal sacrifices? The symbols themselves. The story is literally being told as symbols. That's why they were used. Because they used everyday ordinary things that people knew and understood so that it would be easier to remember the meaning of the symbol/word.

No, you assume this because that's what you were told. Mainstream researchers see no such relationship. It's all based on some religious wack-a-doodle's say so.

 

[Crepitus]

And I'm sure you believe all of that junk.

Sorry, but I don't buy it.

Yes. I even provided the reasons why.

You must be taking it on faith that what I wrote is wrong because you don't seem to be able to articulate the reasons why you believe what I wrote is wrong.

Because it's nonsense. The Chinese characters thing particularly. Some dude in Texas makes an assumption based on wishful thinking and you taken it as gospel(pun intended)?

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

So as I continue to answer your questions, I can't help but notice you haven't presented any evidence for your beliefs. Why is that?

I don't have any "beliefs" in this fight.

 

[ding]

Yes. I even provided the reasons why.

You must be taking it on faith that what I wrote is wrong because you don't seem to be able to articulate the reasons why you believe what I wrote is wrong.

Because it's nonsense. The Chinese characters thing particularly. Some dude in Texas makes an assumption based on wishful thinking and you taken it as gospel(pun intended)?

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

Yes, looked them up for myself.

What leads me to believe the Chinese symbols has anything to do with the account of Genesis? You mean besides the border sacrifices the Chinese performed? And animal sacrifices? The symbols themselves. The story is literally being told as symbols. That's why they were used. Because they used everyday ordinary things that people knew and understood so that it would be easier to remember the meaning of the symbol/word.

No, you assume this because that's what you were told. Mainstream researchers see no such relationship. It's all based on some religious wack-a-doodle's say so.

Wrong. That's you.

I literally did the translation work about ten years ago when a Chinese colleague shared this information with me.

The wack-a-doodle is you. You have zero evidence for your beliefs.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because it's nonsense. The Chinese characters thing particularly. Some dude in Texas makes an assumption based on wishful thinking and you taken it as gospel(pun intended)?

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

Yes, looked them up for myself.

What leads me to believe the Chinese symbols has anything to do with the account of Genesis? You mean besides the border sacrifices the Chinese performed? And animal sacrifices? The symbols themselves. The story is literally being told as symbols. That's why they were used. Because they used everyday ordinary things that people knew and understood so that it would be easier to remember the meaning of the symbol/word.

No, you assume this because that's what you were told. Mainstream researchers see no such relationship. It's all based on some religious wack-a-doodle's say so.

Wrong. That's you.

I literally did the translation work about ten years ago when a Chinese colleague shared this information with me.

The wack-a-doodle is you. You have zero evidence for your beliefs.

Wow! Could you point is to your published research?

Of course not. Ding, you will say ANYTHING.

 

[ding]

Yes. I even provided the reasons why.

You must be taking it on faith that what I wrote is wrong because you don't seem to be able to articulate the reasons why you believe what I wrote is wrong.

Because it's nonsense. The Chinese characters thing particularly. Some dude in Texas makes an assumption based on wishful thinking and you taken it as gospel(pun intended)?

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

So as I continue to answer your questions, I can't help but notice you haven't presented any evidence for your beliefs. Why is that?

I don't have any "beliefs" in this right.

Your belief is that the account of Geness is a fairytale. It's not. It is the allegorical account of world history that all nations share before the migration from the cradle of civilization along with other knowledge they deemed important enough to pass down. They passed this information down from generation to generation for thousands of years before it was ever recorded in writing. They told these stories in a way that would make them easier to remember. And their true meaning has been lost through the ages until we get idiots like you dismissing them as fairytales.

 

[ding]

Nope. I put in the work. Looked up the characters myself.

Not to mention the religious practices of the first dynasties matched the Jewish practices.

Not to mention the migration from the cradle of civilization was a real thing.

Not to mention that the first eleven chapters of the Torah really had been passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years.

So it is your belief that is without any factual basis whatsoever.

Looked up the charatccha yourself did ya?

Please, explain what leads to our to believe they have anything to do with a book they predate by about 1,000 years.

Yes, looked them up for myself.

What leads me to believe the Chinese symbols has anything to do with the account of Genesis? You mean besides the border sacrifices the Chinese performed? And animal sacrifices? The symbols themselves. The story is literally being told as symbols. That's why they were used. Because they used everyday ordinary things that people knew and understood so that it would be easier to remember the meaning of the symbol/word.

No, you assume this because that's what you were told. Mainstream researchers see no such relationship. It's all based on some religious wack-a-doodle's say so.

Wrong. That's you.

I literally did the translation work about ten years ago when a Chinese colleague shared this information with me.

The wack-a-doodle is you. You have zero evidence for your beliefs.

Wow! Could you point is to your published research?

Of course not. Ding, you will say ANYTHING.

There's plenty of stuff out there on it. Feel free to go and cherry pick it. Because I'll just keep pointing to the religious practices of the early Chinese dynasties that confirm it.

 

[ding]

 

[August West]

The Bible was written by men in ancient times.

 

[ding]

(OPINION) CP – On last Sunday’s Meet the Press, NBC News anchor Chuck Todd read and endorsed a letter claiming that supporters of Donald Trump “want to be lied to” since they believe in “fairy tales” such as Noah’s ark.
NBC anchor denigrates those who believe in Noah's Ark, Calls it "fairy tales"



Because when you are a leftist cold-blooded moron what else do you expect these mentally clipped idiots to say.

It is a fairy tale, you retard.

No, man. It's not. It's an allegorical account of a historical event.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Bible was written by men in ancient times.

Based on fairy tales passed orally by ignorant, illiterate, terrified peasants.

As ding will tell you.

Unless that undermines whatever fetish du jour ding has attached himself to.

Then he will tell you the opposite.