NBC: Oprah is OUR future President

[MisterBeale]

Actually, Oprah was able to build a multi-billion dollar company (unlike Trump who just inherited money) and she probably has a much better handle on issues.

She'd probably put together a better team than Trump has.

Harvey Weinstein for the "Status of Women" Portfolio?

Greg

as opposed to the genital grabbing admitted sexual predator who likes watching 15 year old girls get undressed.

quiet, loon.

and for the umpteenth time....

now be quiet

 

[MisterBeale]

she wouldn't be my choice. but she's smarter and more successful than the wackjob in the Oval Office.

and she's sane..... unlike the person there now.

Remember the time we elected the Peanut Farmer?
Or the time we elected the Actor?
Or the time we almost elected the Tech CEO
Or the time we "elected' (not really) the Game Show Host.

Here's the thing, we are always looking for the "outsider" to clean things up in Washington. They almost always go native the minute they get there. But the only guy who ran as a Washington Insider and won since Watergate was George H. Bush.

The real danger here is that we no longer really believe in the political process. 2016 wasn't just bad because Trump "won" (not really), it was bad because Commie Bernie could have won. We put these guys in demanding change and the run into the glacial morass of the Judiciary, Congress and the Bureaucracy. Then we go looking for the next outside who is going to fix things.

BINGO!

The problem isn't with the people that get elected, it is with the century old bureaucracy that has evolved to not be changed. Entrenched interests determine what happens now, both parties respond to it equally.

 

[MisterBeale]

she wouldn't be my choice. but she's smarter and more successful than the wackjob in the Oval Office.and she's sane..... unlike the person there now.

`
`
The author of that article didn't have a bad thing to say about Oprah but that wasn't his point. He was warning democrats and liberals NOT to make the same mistake the simplistic right made in electing trump.....all based of superficial qualities. I like Oprah and while she's not my idol (I have none) I do respect her for what humanitarian good she has accomplished. trump certainly hasn't accomplished any humanitarian good, just the opposite. Still, I will not vote for her as president.

The media is good at doing the thinking for Americans. If the media/social media decide she will be the next POTUS, there isn't a whole lot you can do.

Nation’s Progressives Suddenly In Favor Of Electing TV Personalities As President
Nation's Progressives Suddenly In Favor Of Electing TV Personalities As President

 

[MisterBeale]

Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population, Report Says
Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population, Report Says


"The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.


There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting. . . "

<snip>

". . . But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics. . . . "


The question is, can you really trust a eugenicist that doesn't even believe in having children of her own? How much do you think she cares for yours?

 

[ABikerSailor]

Wow...................conservatives are losing their minds over the possibility that a television personality could possibly consider running for president.

Guess what conservatives? It was the GOP that first decided that an actor (Reagan) and a television personality (Trump) would be qualified for running this country.

 

[Reasonable]

`
"Clinton called Trump “totally unqualified,” while an op-ed from the New York Times editorial board, headlined “Why Donald Trump Should Not Be President,” pointed out that the GOP candidate “has no experience in national security.” Three days after the election, Vox ran a piece headlined, “Donald Trump is the only U.S. president ever with no political or military experience.”

Well, dear liberals and Democrats, guess what? President Winfrey would be the second such president. Is this really what most Americans want or what the United States government needs? Another clueless celebrity in possession of the nuclear codes? Another billionaire mogul who doesn’t like paying taxes in charge of the economy? And how would it be anything other than sheer hypocrisy for Democrats to offer an unqualified, inexperienced presidential candidate to the American electorate in 2020, given all that they said about Trump in 2016?

Granted, Oprah isn’t a raging narcissist or a racist bigot; she doesn’t have ties to white nationalists, isn’t accused of colluding with a foreign government, and hasn’t been caught on tape admitting to sexual assault. Oprah would be a far superior, smarter, and more stable president than Trump in every imaginable way. But that, of course, is a low, low bar". - Source
`
`

All this talk about a president Oprah is rather stupid and once again proves that Americans across the board, are being dumbed down and are severely lacking in critical thinking skills. They are more captivated and moved by style or form, over substance. They like to be entertained, not challenged. They react with almost child-like emotional frenzy to short term stimuli without considering the long term ramifications.

Oprah is an admirable person with many good qualities but IS NOT, presidential material. ​

Trump has lowered the standard for all future candidates for president.
Oprah raises that low bar by a country mile.

 

[Reasonable]

Wow...................conservatives are losing their minds over the possibility that a television personality could possibly consider running for president.

Guess what conservatives? It was the GOP that first decided that an actor (Reagan) and a television personality (Trump) would be qualified for running this country.

They’re petrified of seeing another black president. Also having a woman black president sends them into convulsions.

 

[iceberg]

Wow...................conservatives are losing their minds over the possibility that a television personality could possibly consider running for president.

Guess what conservatives? It was the GOP that first decided that an actor (Reagan) and a television personality (Trump) would be qualified for running this country.

who's losing their minds? sensational headlines sure - but they are always that way.

 

[Reasonable]

Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population, Report Says
Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population, Report Says


"The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.


There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting. . . "

<snip>

". . . But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics. . . . "


The question is, can you really trust a eugenicist that doesn't even believe in having children of her own? How much do you think she cares for yours?

Wonder why Trump’s not on that list. Probably because he’s not a billionaire nor has any interest in helping people.

 

[Reasonable]

Like it or not, the first campaign issue would be truth in advertising.

Idiot isn’t smart enough to know the picture on the right was a very young Oprah.

 

[Reasonable]

Based on where we are right now, she makes sense. We're just going in a really, really, really weird direction right now.

Not really. We are just tired of politics as usual.

These guys get to Washington, they get nothing done, and you wonder why we embrace the "Celebrity" candidate?

If the rationale for electing Trump is valid, then the same would apply to WInfrey, who is far more personally successful and isn't a crazy person.

Lol
You’re a fucking moron for thinking so. She’s nothing but a human tabloid and exploiter of fucked up people, that’s how she got her start.
There would be no trump if there was no Obama

4 lies in that one post. About your average.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Like it or not, the first campaign issue would be truth in advertising.

Idiot isn’t smart enough to know the picture on the right was a very young Oprah.

Actually, you got it backwards. The one on the left is the older picture and the one on the right is a current one. After she got famous, she started to have some light plastic surgery done when she was going through her weight loss/weight gain/weight loss.

 

[Reasonable]

right when i thought the dnc was going back to basics ....focus on organization and such...this....oprah is not the future

Oprah is a winner. She’s won at everything she’s ever attempted. Having a sane, stable, competent human being would be a refreshing change compared to the bat shit crazy person we now have in the Oval Office.

 

[Leo123]

Wow...................conservatives are losing their minds over the possibility that a television personality could possibly consider running for president.

Guess what conservatives? It was the GOP that first decided that an actor (Reagan) and a television personality (Trump) would be qualified for running this country.

Leftist Liberal Democrats just don't get it. They thought being a woman would get Hillary elected NOW they think Oprah will get elected because she's a 'television personality.' Their thinking is naive and shallow and they believe We The People are naive and shallow. What morons.

 

[Reasonable]

Like it or not, the first campaign issue would be truth in advertising.

Idiot isn’t smart enough to know the picture on the right was a very young Oprah.

Actually, you got it backwards. The one on the left is the older picture and the one on the right is a current one. After she got famous, she started to have some light plastic surgery done when she was going through her weight loss/weight gain/weight loss.

No I got it right. I said the one on the right is the younger picture.

 

[Hal-9000]

https://nypost.com/2017/09/27/democrats-best-hope-for-2020-oprah/ Oprah, how would you tackle homelessness...............

Well I would put homes under their seats, LOL

 

[Reasonable]

Wow...................conservatives are losing their minds over the possibility that a television personality could possibly consider running for president.

Guess what conservatives? It was the GOP that first decided that an actor (Reagan) and a television personality (Trump) would be qualified for running this country.

Leftist Liberal Democrats just don't get it. They thought being a woman would get Hillary elected NOW they think Oprah will get elected because she's a 'television personality.' Their thinking is either naive and shallow OR they believe We The People are naive and shallow.

No we KNOW you’re shallow and about as bright as a small appliance bulb for voting for the incompetent serial sex offender.
Oprah would be a HUGE step up from President Crazypants in every single area.
She’s sane, stable, a hard worker, cares about people and won’t let people in her tax bracket make out like bandits.

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know, I'm not overly fond of Oprah, but I do think she is smart enough to do a better job than Trump. She came up from poverty, became a television reporter, and then leveraged that into becoming one of the most well known talk show hosts, and then built a television empire.

 

[jillian]

You know, I'm not overly fond of Oprah, but I do think she is smart enough to do a better job than Trump. She came up from poverty, became a television reporter, and then leveraged that into becoming one of the most well known talk show hosts, and then built a television empire.

my pet rabbit is smart enough to do a better job than Donald. but you happen to be correct as to the rest.

 

[Leo123]

They’re petrified of seeing another black president. Also having a woman black president sends them into convulsions.

Smearing others as racist is something leftist-racists do. This accomplishes two things for them...1) It keeps their 'minority' wards down on the government plantation by striking fear in them by creating false racist 'monsters'.... 2) It supports their racist belief that skin color has a meaning.