New Neg Rep Rule Extreme and Unfair...

[koshergrl]

And she's not the only one who did that.

 

[Amelia]

Jillian was the first asshole ever to neg me. try again wimp.

Can't think why with your sunny disposition and all....

so in your mind it's okay for liberals to abuse newby's got it.

It's not a liberal/conservative thing. Newbies sometimes get knocked around by assholes. What ideology doesn't have its share of assholes?

 

[Lumpy 1]

creepy and stupid

that's my shorteyes

I'm posting the truth, you're a pathetic asshole.

Jeez Lump, this is ManRider's meltdown thread, make your own.

I'm just not the type to play along to get along Bob...but perhaps your right, we'll see.

I think Palerider should have the right to state his view, he made a lot of good points, started a discussion and in my view should be appreciated for it.

 

[Sarah G]

I don't want them to cut the rep, the neg system they have now should help. It allows the noobs to gain a little traction and earn some rep.

I always hated repping people only to have somebody come along and neg the shit out of them. Such a waste.

you will NEVER solve the problem here, UNLESS you proportionately cut the rep...periodically.

cutting the points is cutting the points, BIG DEAL. At least our free speech is not cut, you can still neg rep who ya like and it won't hurt them....

by doing it this way, waiting the 48 hours, you solve nothing in the order of making it impossible for someone to get out of the hole on rep points.

Negative rep is suppose to be given if you vehemently disagree with a poster, NOT BECAUSE you want to blow them out of the water with your boo coos of negative rep points.

Yes, I know. This new system allows for negs but creates a boundary. This negging people 2 times a day is not correct. Especially if you have a ton of rep.

 

[bobcollum]

Jillian was the first asshole ever to neg me. try again wimp.

Can't think why with your sunny disposition and all....

so in your mind it's okay for liberals to abuse newby's got it.

All over the place with this one.

 

[007]

I truly don't believe the rules needed changing, everyone just needed rep points cut by 90% equally, for all.... and if this is done periodically, to keep most under 1000 rep points, people being negged won't be blown in to the abyss with neg rep points.

It's FAIR to all and keeps it where it is FUN for ALL...all, meaning the newbies as well as the old timers, those being negged, those giving negs, etc...

As Mods, you don't have to monitor this new rule, as a poster you don't have to worry about negging someone twice during a 48 hour period....

Just cut everyone's rep at the same percentage...it gives newbies a ''chance'' of surviving the negative blasts that could come, it makes it fun, for everyone again...

It's NOT the negative rep and what's said or the nasty comment that hurts, it's being blown in to oblivion by a member with huge huge huge negative rep points that hurts and takes the fun out of it, and out of being here and truly, unfair imho.

Wouldn't you still neg rep a member you don't like or disagree with, if your rep points were half of what they were? OF COURSE you would! so the fun is still there for the long timers as well....

Previous admin, never let it get over a thousand....until the end before he left....

Echo and all of us were pushing people with rep to go over the thousand mark in echo Zulu's Rep fest zone, it was a real party around here! It should have been cut back the 50% right around then....too....but since it wasn't, it has balooned in to a huge disparity.

Don't be afraid to lose your rep 'power', the percentage drop is equal for everyone, so if you have 4000 rep points and cut 90%, then you go down to 360, and if you have 1000 points now, 90% less would be 90, if you only have 100 points now then you would have 9 after the 90% cut....

So those with seniority or boocoos of rep will still proportionately have 'the power'....but that power won't be enough to run people off the board, and it SHOULDN'T BE enough for members to run people off the board...that's when it becomes, not fun....and that's when bullies can be formed, NOT that I am saying we have bullies here or anything of the such, but this eliminates the possibility, with neg rep point accumulation.

Keep it under a thousand, periodically cut it back by X percent....much fewer headaches for mods, fewer whines, and makes it much more fun for new combers....

Well fuck lady, if you're going to periodically cut it back then why the fuck give it in the first damn place? you nutz?

 

[007]

 

[Sarah G]

I'm posting the truth, you're a pathetic asshole.

Jeez Lump, this is ManRider's meltdown thread, make your own.

I'm just not the type to play along to get along Bob...but perhaps your right, we'll see.

I think Palerider should have the right to state his view, he made a lot of good points, started a discussion and in my view should be appreciated for it.

Except that he was wrong.

 

[Dot Com]

I'd be certainly welcome to the mods or administrator going through my + and -reps to find probable cause of rep abuse, I think we all should to verify those elusive "esteemed members".

The Bachmann defense? Everybody needs to be investigated. lol

 

[bobcollum]

I'm posting the truth, you're a pathetic asshole.

Jeez Lump, this is ManRider's meltdown thread, make your own.

I'm just not the type to play along to get along Bob...but perhaps your right, we'll see.

I think Palerider should have the right to state his view, he made a lot of good points, started a discussion and in my view should be appreciated for it.

Nobody's saying that he can't state his view. We still have the right to state our view about his view, yeah?

 

[del]

Jeez Lump, this is ManRider's meltdown thread, make your own.

I'm just not the type to play along to get along Bob...but perhaps your right, we'll see.

I think Palerider should have the right to state his view, he made a lot of good points, started a discussion and in my view should be appreciated for it.

Except that he was wrong.

and whining like a little bitch

 

[Si modo]

I don't want them to cut the rep, the neg system they have now should help. It allows the noobs to gain a little traction and earn some rep.

I always hated repping people only to have somebody come along and neg the shit out of them. Such a waste.

you will NEVER solve the problem here, UNLESS you proportionately cut the rep...periodically.

cutting the points is cutting the points, BIG DEAL. At least our free speech is not cut, you can still neg rep who ya like and it won't hurt them....

by doing it this way, waiting the 48 hours, you solve nothing in the order of making it impossible for someone to get out of the hole on rep points.

Negative rep is suppose to be given if you vehemently disagree with a poster, NOT BECAUSE you want to blow them out of the water with your boo coos of negative rep points.

Yes, I know. This new system allows for negs but creates a boundary. This negging people 2 times a day is not correct. Especially if you have a ton of rep.

So, the older system allowed for a max of three negs in one day. Pubes knows that. And he whined. Maybe others did, too. It was changed.

The recently replaced system allowed for two negs in one say. Folks whined. It was changed.

The new system allows for one neg in two days.........................





Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

 

[Sarah G]

I'm just not the type to play along to get along Bob...but perhaps your right, we'll see.

I think Palerider should have the right to state his view, he made a lot of good points, started a discussion and in my view should be appreciated for it.

Except that he was wrong.

and whining like a little bitch

Yeah, the little pale riding bitch..

 

[007]

You know, I hate to inject anything serious into Pole Rider's hilarious meltdown thread, but I always wince when someone posts that video.

The only thing you do like to INJECT synthawhorelick is your cock up your butt buddies ass ya little homo...

 

[del]

lumpy's view

 

[del]

You know, I hate to inject anything serious into Pole Rider's hilarious meltdown thread, but I always wince when someone posts that video.

The only thing you do like to INJECT synthawhorelick is your cock up your butt buddies ass ya little homo...

do you work at being a complete fuckwit or is it a genetic predisposition?

 

[Si modo]

This thread is a stitch. The OP is talking "disasters" and that the rules are "draconian".

Then others are in some sort of utopia about the changes.





Funny extreme views of something that is not all that different, except for quantities, than before.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Jeez Lump, this is ManRider's meltdown thread, make your own.

I'm just not the type to play along to get along Bob...but perhaps your right, we'll see.

I think Palerider should have the right to state his view, he made a lot of good points, started a discussion and in my view should be appreciated for it.

Except that he was wrong.

That's your view which is valid because it's yours.. The Op gives you the opportunity to present your view pro or con.

I believe that should be appreciated.

 

[Synthaholic]

There has been a posse of conservatives teaming up to drive off newly joined liberal posters. They abused their power and piled red stars in an attempt to bully new posters they didn't agree with

They had it coming

Bullshit.

There was an influx of loons who come on here making loony pronouncements, and they got the shit negged out of them because they were batshit crazy, dishonest, and assholes as well.

And to hear you and Grump whine about it, it appears they were friends of yours!

Shocking, that!

You tried to flood the site with compatriots, who pissed their pants and deserted ship.

You poor thing. It's so sad. Really.

Get used to it. You don't represent the majority. The majority finds you, and your type, repugnant. So you piss and moan in order to force the majority to put up with your shit...because they would never do it willingly. I think we all know that.

It sucks to be a member of a hated extremist minority, doesn't it?

Sorry, but Rightwinger is spot on.

Look at franco - he was negged mercilessly for posting facts that are uncomfortable to wingnuts.

 

[koshergrl]

No, he was negged mercilessly for posting bullshit extremist views that the majority doesn't approve of.

See how that works?