New Roy Moore Poll Numbers Have to Be Scaring Democrats

[miketx]

Just like a liberal..... Who implied rape? No one, it is justin your mind.

Clinton and Lewinsky had a consensual relationship, not sure why you are comparing that to a non-consensual encounter between a man in his 30s and a fourteen year old.

There is no real comparison to be made. The issue with Bill Clinton and Leweinsky is that he disgraced the office and lied under oath about it.

Yeah, he lied about a blow job, bfd.

Clearly you cannot understand what morals are. When you disrespect the highest office in the land by having sex out of wedlock, and then lie under oath about it, it certainly is a bfd. The fact that you don't think so is a sad example of what is wrong with people today. No way he should have done that.

Why would I care who the president is screwing unless he's some moralist a-hole?

Your attitude is why liberals are losing all over. In fact, you are a threat to this countries survival. Just look at the mess we are in now regarding sexual things. And you don't care.

 

[bripat9643]

Doesn't this happen each and every time? A few women say BS, and after it hits the media, more and more seem to crawl out of the woodwork?

They're afraid to be the only one to come out BUT when they see others they lose that fear The only reason Moore gets any votes is because he has an R after his name and says he is a christian .... politics above country

No, I think I would vote for him too if he was running in my state. I get so sick of these unproven allegations destroying people's lives and careers. They've done it to sports figures, they've done it to people in the entertainment world, and now they're doing it to politicians.

And in each and every case, we get the same ole "They were scared to come out" instead of that slight possibility that these women were lying, and only wanted to see their names in the paper or even a television interview.

There is no right or wrong here. Some make claims with no proof and the other denies the claims. Nobody knows who is right. We weren't there. However there are some fishy things going on in these stories that gives me reason to believe they were made up.

So you believe they get personal gain from coming out against a molester? Really?

I believe some big Dim donors are paying them.

did you believe the same about B Clintons accusers?

They didn't all magically appear right before an election.

 

[Esmeralda]

The timing is a coincidence. It has to do with #MeToo. It isn't just Republicans who are being accused. It isn't just him.

It's more than a coincidence and if you don't believe it is then you're stupid. This has ZERO to do with some hashtag or trend. It's typical Democrat dirty tricks on the eve of an election... just like they did going back to Clarence Thomas. It's been done over and over and it follows the same exact pattern.

To date, there is NO clear evidence against Roy Moore for anything illegal. There is one woman (52) who claims he fondled her when she was 14... 38 years ago. We don't know if that allegation is true or not. We're not going to find out before the election. In addition, we have all these assorted other allegations from other women but none of them are accusations of anything illegal, just creepy as fuck, which isn't a crime... even if they are telling the truth.

Again... I don't know what's true or not true. I think it's highly suspicious all these allegations are just now surfacing on Moore. I explained why I think it's suspicious and again, you don't have to agree with me... that's MY opinion. I think this is a load of crap and he's being smeared by Democrats who knew they had no shot at this seat.

There is no conspiracy. People who believe in conspiracies are people who don't have any critical thinking skills. It has to do with MeToo, completely. It isn't just Republicans who are being accused.

The whoie "Russian collusion" thing is the biggest conspiricy ever conjured, and snowflakes believe it to the last man.

It's a conspiracy, yes. That's why they are already indicting people.

 

[HappyJoy]

Clinton and Lewinsky had a consensual relationship, not sure why you are comparing that to a non-consensual encounter between a man in his 30s and a fourteen year old.

There is no real comparison to be made. The issue with Bill Clinton and Leweinsky is that he disgraced the office and lied under oath about it.

Yeah, he lied about a blow job, bfd.

Clearly you cannot understand what morals are. When you disrespect the highest office in the land by having sex out of wedlock, and then lie under oath about it, it certainly is a bfd. The fact that you don't think so is a sad example of what is wrong with people today. No way he should have done that.

Why would I care who the president is screwing unless he's some moralist a-hole?

Your attitude is why liberals are losing all over. In fact, you are a threat to this countries survival. Just look at the mess we are in now regarding sexual things. And you don't care.

When it comes to Monica Lewinsky? No, I don't care at all, it was completely consensual.

Now, with Trump it's not consensual. Same with Roy Moore, but somehow according to you their actions are the fault of liberals? Funny joke.

 

[HappyJoy]

The timing is a coincidence. It has to do with #MeToo. It isn't just Republicans who are being accused. It isn't just him.

It's more than a coincidence and if you don't believe it is then you're stupid. This has ZERO to do with some hashtag or trend. It's typical Democrat dirty tricks on the eve of an election... just like they did going back to Clarence Thomas. It's been done over and over and it follows the same exact pattern.

To date, there is NO clear evidence against Roy Moore for anything illegal. There is one woman (52) who claims he fondled her when she was 14... 38 years ago. We don't know if that allegation is true or not. We're not going to find out before the election. In addition, we have all these assorted other allegations from other women but none of them are accusations of anything illegal, just creepy as fuck, which isn't a crime... even if they are telling the truth.

Again... I don't know what's true or not true. I think it's highly suspicious all these allegations are just now surfacing on Moore. I explained why I think it's suspicious and again, you don't have to agree with me... that's MY opinion. I think this is a load of crap and he's being smeared by Democrats who knew they had no shot at this seat.

There is no conspiracy. People who believe in conspiracies are people who don't have any critical thinking skills. It has to do with MeToo, completely. It isn't just Republicans who are being accused.

The whoie "Russian collusion" thing is the biggest conspiricy ever conjured, and snowflakes believe it to the last man.

It's a conspiracy, yes. That's why they are already indicting people.

Bripart hasn't come to terms with Obama's birth certificate yet, give him time.

 

[miketx]

There is no real comparison to be made. The issue with Bill Clinton and Leweinsky is that he disgraced the office and lied under oath about it.

Yeah, he lied about a blow job, bfd.

Clearly you cannot understand what morals are. When you disrespect the highest office in the land by having sex out of wedlock, and then lie under oath about it, it certainly is a bfd. The fact that you don't think so is a sad example of what is wrong with people today. No way he should have done that.

Why would I care who the president is screwing unless he's some moralist a-hole?

Your attitude is why liberals are losing all over. In fact, you are a threat to this countries survival. Just look at the mess we are in now regarding sexual things. And you don't care.

When it comes to Monica Lewinsky? No, I don't care at all, it was completely consensual.

Now, with Trump it's not consensual. Same with Roy Moore, but somehow according to you their actions are the fault of liberals? Funny joke.

Clearly you cannot comprehend morals and how the leader of the free world should behave. People like you should be institutionalized.

 

[Meathead]

The snowflakes have been gloating about Moore's chances, but the latest polls show their confidence is misplaced.

New Roy Moore Poll Numbers Have to Be Scaring Democrats​

Alabama’s Republican Senate candidate and former Chief Justice Roy Moore has come under increasingly heavy fire in recent weeks after accusations of sexual misconduct on his part with teenage girls that is alleged to have occurred roughly 40 years ago.

Moore has steadfastly and vehemently denied the allegations against him, even as the mainstream media, Democrats and even many Republicans have seemingly already convicted him in the court of public opinion, demanding he step aside from the special senatorial election.

Yet, despite the flurry of unverifiable attacks on Moore’s reputation and credibility — or perhaps because of them — Moore is still leading his Democrat opponent Doug Jones in a major statewide poll, according to The Daily Caller.

Rather than see his support plummet to near zero, as the forces aligned against him seemed to think would happen, Moore still enjoys a six-point lead in a broad survey of 3,000 likely voters in the state’s special election. And that has to be scaring Democrats.​

They supported the old pussy grabber despite all the allegations of sexual misconduct. They will certainly support a white supremacist who refused to enforce federal laws, and dates teenagers. These are qualifications for office in Alabama.

I grabbed pussy on occasion, You might have gotten laid if you had, and yet, I have never sought office in Alabama.

People in Alabama are all related to each other You might have had a great career there

You still have no idea why you lost. I've never been to Alabama, and to the best of my knowledge I am not related to anybody who has. Yet, I would be much prouder than if II were from some scuzzy liberal city.

 

[eddiew37]

They're afraid to be the only one to come out BUT when they see others they lose that fear The only reason Moore gets any votes is because he has an R after his name and says he is a christian .... politics above country

No, I think I would vote for him too if he was running in my state. I get so sick of these unproven allegations destroying people's lives and careers. They've done it to sports figures, they've done it to people in the entertainment world, and now they're doing it to politicians.

And in each and every case, we get the same ole "They were scared to come out" instead of that slight possibility that these women were lying, and only wanted to see their names in the paper or even a television interview.

There is no right or wrong here. Some make claims with no proof and the other denies the claims. Nobody knows who is right. We weren't there. However there are some fishy things going on in these stories that gives me reason to believe they were made up.

So you believe they get personal gain from coming out against a molester? Really?

I believe some big Dim donors are paying them.

did you believe the same about B Clintons accusers?

They didn't all magically appear right before an election.

Funny how you believe all accusers except those against Trump and Moore

 

[HappyJoy]

Yeah, he lied about a blow job, bfd.

Clearly you cannot understand what morals are. When you disrespect the highest office in the land by having sex out of wedlock, and then lie under oath about it, it certainly is a bfd. The fact that you don't think so is a sad example of what is wrong with people today. No way he should have done that.

Why would I care who the president is screwing unless he's some moralist a-hole?

Your attitude is why liberals are losing all over. In fact, you are a threat to this countries survival. Just look at the mess we are in now regarding sexual things. And you don't care.

When it comes to Monica Lewinsky? No, I don't care at all, it was completely consensual.

Now, with Trump it's not consensual. Same with Roy Moore, but somehow according to you their actions are the fault of liberals? Funny joke.

Clearly you cannot comprehend morals and how the leader of the free world should behave. People like you should be institutionalized.

You mean like voting for someone who calls the women he assaulted and harassed liars?

Seriously, I really don't care where the president puts his cigar as long as both parties are cool with it.

 

[bripat9643]

The timing is a coincidence. It has to do with #MeToo. It isn't just Republicans who are being accused. It isn't just him.

It's more than a coincidence and if you don't believe it is then you're stupid. This has ZERO to do with some hashtag or trend. It's typical Democrat dirty tricks on the eve of an election... just like they did going back to Clarence Thomas. It's been done over and over and it follows the same exact pattern.

To date, there is NO clear evidence against Roy Moore for anything illegal. There is one woman (52) who claims he fondled her when she was 14... 38 years ago. We don't know if that allegation is true or not. We're not going to find out before the election. In addition, we have all these assorted other allegations from other women but none of them are accusations of anything illegal, just creepy as fuck, which isn't a crime... even if they are telling the truth.

Again... I don't know what's true or not true. I think it's highly suspicious all these allegations are just now surfacing on Moore. I explained why I think it's suspicious and again, you don't have to agree with me... that's MY opinion. I think this is a load of crap and he's being smeared by Democrats who knew they had no shot at this seat.

There is no conspiracy. People who believe in conspiracies are people who don't have any critical thinking skills. It has to do with MeToo, completely. It isn't just Republicans who are being accused.

The whoie "Russian collusion" thing is the biggest conspiricy ever conjured, and snowflakes believe it to the last man.

It's a conspiracy, yes. That's why they are already indicting people.

They haven't indicted anyone for colluding with the Russians.

 

[eddiew37]

The snowflakes have been gloating about Moore's chances, but the latest polls show their confidence is misplaced.

New Roy Moore Poll Numbers Have to Be Scaring Democrats​

Alabama’s Republican Senate candidate and former Chief Justice Roy Moore has come under increasingly heavy fire in recent weeks after accusations of sexual misconduct on his part with teenage girls that is alleged to have occurred roughly 40 years ago.

Moore has steadfastly and vehemently denied the allegations against him, even as the mainstream media, Democrats and even many Republicans have seemingly already convicted him in the court of public opinion, demanding he step aside from the special senatorial election.

Yet, despite the flurry of unverifiable attacks on Moore’s reputation and credibility — or perhaps because of them — Moore is still leading his Democrat opponent Doug Jones in a major statewide poll, according to The Daily Caller.

Rather than see his support plummet to near zero, as the forces aligned against him seemed to think would happen, Moore still enjoys a six-point lead in a broad survey of 3,000 likely voters in the state’s special election. And that has to be scaring Democrats.​

They supported the old pussy grabber despite all the allegations of sexual misconduct. They will certainly support a white supremacist who refused to enforce federal laws, and dates teenagers. These are qualifications for office in Alabama.

I grabbed pussy on occasion, You might have gotten laid if you had, and yet, I have never sought office in Alabama.

People in Alabama are all related to each other You might have had a great career there

You still have no idea why you lost. I've never been to Alabama, and to the best of my knowledge I am not related to anybody who has. Yet, I would be much prouder than if II were from some scuzzy liberal city.

"NY NY it's a wonderful town"

 

[Boss]

If they hadn't investigated him for sexual behavior how the hell did Lewinsky come up? JHC. You are worthless. Only concerned with accusing me of something of which you actually have no idea. You refuse to think logically.

Because he lied under oath in the Paula Jones case and his affair with Monica Lewinsky proved that. He denied he had an affair with her. They found the blue cum-stained dress. Do we have to go through the entire case again? It was not about his sexual behavior... it was about his LYING UNDER OATH!

He lied about Lewinsky. That was the issue.

He lied under oath. That's called perjury and it's a "high crime or misdemeanor" therefore, he was impeached. He wasn't impeached because he stuck his dick in an intern half his age. At the time, those of you who supported Clinton said his personal life shouldn't be an issue. We were to disregard that he used his position of power to seduce a young intern, that was completely ignored and dismissed.

Also dismissed were the numerous other allegations of sexual misconduct, like the very trial he perjured himself in with Paula Jones who was suing him for sexual harassment. Then there was Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broadderick, both of whom alleged sexual assault and rape, respectively. Again... these allegations were summarily dismissed by his supporters and Hillary Clinton led the charge to publicly destroy these women in the court of public opinion.

So I don't need any fucking lectures from leftists about purported sexual misconduct. IF you have some goddamn credible evidence against Mr. Moore, let's fucking see it! If not, shut your damn pie hole because you don't have any credibility when it comes to this.

 

[Esmeralda]

If they hadn't investigated him for sexual behavior how the hell did Lewinsky come up? JHC. You are worthless. Only concerned with accusing me of something of which you actually have no idea. You refuse to think logically.

Because he lied under oath in the Paula Jones case and his affair with Monica Lewinsky proved that. He denied he had an affair with her. They found the blue cum-stained dress. Do we have to go through the entire case again? It was not about his sexual behavior... it was about his LYING UNDER OATH!

He lied about Lewinsky. That was the issue.

He lied under oath. That's called perjury and it's a "high crime or misdemeanor" therefore, he was impeached. He wasn't impeached because he stuck his dick in an intern half his age. At the time, those of you who supported Clinton said his personal life shouldn't be an issue. We were to disregard that he used his position of power to seduce a young intern, that was completely ignored and dismissed.

Also dismissed were the numerous other allegations of sexual misconduct, like the very trial he perjured himself in with Paula Jones who was suing him for sexual harassment. Then there was Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broadderick, both of whom alleged sexual assault and rape, respectively. Again... these allegations were summarily dismissed by his supporters and Hillary Clinton led the charge to publicly destroy these women in the court of public opinion.

So I don't need any fucking lectures from leftists about purported sexual misconduct. IF you have some goddamn credible evidence against Mr. Moore, let's fucking see it! If not, shut your damn pie hole because you don't have any credibility when it comes to this.

 

[HappyJoy]

If they hadn't investigated him for sexual behavior how the hell did Lewinsky come up? JHC. You are worthless. Only concerned with accusing me of something of which you actually have no idea. You refuse to think logically.

Because he lied under oath in the Paula Jones case and his affair with Monica Lewinsky proved that. He denied he had an affair with her. They found the blue cum-stained dress. Do we have to go through the entire case again? It was not about his sexual behavior... it was about his LYING UNDER OATH!

He lied about Lewinsky. That was the issue.

He lied under oath. That's called perjury and it's a "high crime or misdemeanor" therefore, he was impeached. He wasn't impeached because he stuck his dick in an intern half his age. At the time, those of you who supported Clinton said his personal life shouldn't be an issue. We were to disregard that he used his position of power to seduce a young intern, that was completely ignored and dismissed.

Also dismissed were the numerous other allegations of sexual misconduct, like the very trial he perjured himself in with Paula Jones who was suing him for sexual harassment. Then there was Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broadderick, both of whom alleged sexual assault and rape, respectively. Again... these allegations were summarily dismissed by his supporters and Hillary Clinton led the charge to publicly destroy these women in the court of public opinion.

So I don't need any fucking lectures from leftists about purported sexual misconduct. IF you have some goddamn credible evidence against Mr. Moore, let's fucking see it! If not, shut your damn pie hole because you don't have any credibility when it comes to this.

Just curious. if Juanita Broaddrick (at least get her name right) is credible, why aren't the women accusing Moore?

 

[Meathead]

The snowflakes have been gloating about Moore's chances, but the latest polls show their confidence is misplaced.

New Roy Moore Poll Numbers Have to Be Scaring Democrats​

Alabama’s Republican Senate candidate and former Chief Justice Roy Moore has come under increasingly heavy fire in recent weeks after accusations of sexual misconduct on his part with teenage girls that is alleged to have occurred roughly 40 years ago.

Moore has steadfastly and vehemently denied the allegations against him, even as the mainstream media, Democrats and even many Republicans have seemingly already convicted him in the court of public opinion, demanding he step aside from the special senatorial election.

Yet, despite the flurry of unverifiable attacks on Moore’s reputation and credibility — or perhaps because of them — Moore is still leading his Democrat opponent Doug Jones in a major statewide poll, according to The Daily Caller.

Rather than see his support plummet to near zero, as the forces aligned against him seemed to think would happen, Moore still enjoys a six-point lead in a broad survey of 3,000 likely voters in the state’s special election. And that has to be scaring Democrats.​

They supported the old pussy grabber despite all the allegations of sexual misconduct. They will certainly support a white supremacist who refused to enforce federal laws, and dates teenagers. These are qualifications for office in Alabama.

I grabbed pussy on occasion, You might have gotten laid if you had, and yet, I have never sought office in Alabama.

People in Alabama are all related to each other You might have had a great career there

You still have no idea why you lost. I've never been to Alabama, and to the best of my knowledge I am not related to anybody who has. Yet, I would be much prouder than if II were from some scuzzy liberal city.

"NY NY it's a wonderful town"

I've only spent a few days there. Interesting city, but I can't give a rat's ass otherwise.

 

[eddiew37]

If they hadn't investigated him for sexual behavior how the hell did Lewinsky come up? JHC. You are worthless. Only concerned with accusing me of something of which you actually have no idea. You refuse to think logically.

Because he lied under oath in the Paula Jones case and his affair with Monica Lewinsky proved that. He denied he had an affair with her. They found the blue cum-stained dress. Do we have to go through the entire case again? It was not about his sexual behavior... it was about his LYING UNDER OATH!

He lied about Lewinsky. That was the issue.

He lied under oath. That's called perjury and it's a "high crime or misdemeanor" therefore, he was impeached. He wasn't impeached because he stuck his dick in an intern half his age. At the time, those of you who supported Clinton said his personal life shouldn't be an issue. We were to disregard that he used his position of power to seduce a young intern, that was completely ignored and dismissed.

Also dismissed were the numerous other allegations of sexual misconduct, like the very trial he perjured himself in with Paula Jones who was suing him for sexual harassment. Then there was Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broadderick, both of whom alleged sexual assault and rape, respectively. Again... these allegations were summarily dismissed by his supporters and Hillary Clinton led the charge to publicly destroy these women in the court of public opinion.

So I don't need any fucking lectures from leftists about purported sexual misconduct. IF you have some goddamn credible evidence against Mr. Moore, let's fucking see it! If not, shut your damn pie hole because you don't have any credibility when it comes to this.

Jones is a uniter Moore is a divider He was scum before the accusers told the stories about him

 

[cnelsen]

Why would this scare the Dems? This is the best thing that could happen. Elect a child molester the faces of each of those girls will be in ads for the Dems during the election. Most states are not like Alabama and do not approve or such actions.

Yer kinda stoopid, aincha? Here's a little free wisdom. Gloria Allred is a liar. The Washington Post lies. The New Yrok Times lies. And they are all YOUR ENEMY. You're welcome.

 

[Esmeralda]

The timing is a coincidence. It has to do with #MeToo. It isn't just Republicans who are being accused. It isn't just him.

It's more than a coincidence and if you don't believe it is then you're stupid. This has ZERO to do with some hashtag or trend. It's typical Democrat dirty tricks on the eve of an election... just like they did going back to Clarence Thomas. It's been done over and over and it follows the same exact pattern.

To date, there is NO clear evidence against Roy Moore for anything illegal. There is one woman (52) who claims he fondled her when she was 14... 38 years ago. We don't know if that allegation is true or not. We're not going to find out before the election. In addition, we have all these assorted other allegations from other women but none of them are accusations of anything illegal, just creepy as fuck, which isn't a crime... even if they are telling the truth.

Again... I don't know what's true or not true. I think it's highly suspicious all these allegations are just now surfacing on Moore. I explained why I think it's suspicious and again, you don't have to agree with me... that's MY opinion. I think this is a load of crap and he's being smeared by Democrats who knew they had no shot at this seat.

There is no conspiracy. People who believe in conspiracies are people who don't have any critical thinking skills. It has to do with MeToo, completely. It isn't just Republicans who are being accused.

The whoie "Russian collusion" thing is the biggest conspiricy ever conjured, and snowflakes believe it to the last man.

It's a conspiracy, yes. That's why they are already indicting people.

They haven't indicted anyone for colluding with the Russians.

Political consultant Paul Manafort and his business partner Rick Gates were indicted on charges including conspiracy against the United States, money laundering, tax fraud and failure to register as lobbyists for the former government of Ukraine.

Separately, the Justice Department announced that Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos has pleaded guilty to making false statements to FBI agents about his contacts with Russia-linked individuals who claimed to possess damaging information on Trump's election opponent, Hillary Clinton. There is no indication that Papadopoulos, an international energy lawyer with very little foreign policy experience, ever received such information.

How does this relate to investigations into Russia’s alleged interference in the last U.S. presidential elections?

Manafort served as Trump’s presidential campaign chair before resigning last August after media reports investigating his ties to pro-Russian Ukrainian political groups.

Although Papadopoulos' position in the campaign was minor compared to Manafort's, his case could be more serious. That's because it involves possible collusion between Trump campaign officials and Moscow, which is the main focus of Mueller's investigation

Mueller Indictments Explained

 

[HappyJoy]

Why would this scare the Dems? This is the best thing that could happen. Elect a child molester the faces of each of those girls will be in ads for the Dems during the election. Most states are not like Alabama and do not approve or such actions.

Yer kinda stoopid, aincha? Here's a little free wisdom. Gloria Allred is a liar. The Washington Post lies. The New Yrok Times lies. And they are all YOUR ENEMY. You're welcome.

Sure buddy, this is on Roy Moore.

 

[cnelsen]

Why would this scare the Dems? This is the best thing that could happen. Elect a child molester the faces of each of those girls will be in ads for the Dems during the election. Most states are not like Alabama and do not approve or such actions.

Yer kinda stoopid, aincha? Here's a little free wisdom. Gloria Allred is a liar. The Washington Post lies. The New Yrok Times lies. And they are all YOUR ENEMY. You're welcome.

Sure buddy, this is on Roy Moore.

You mean like all those women the Post paraded just before the 2016 election? They were "on Trump", as I recall you saying. Where is they now, chump?