Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 36,458
- 24,031
You'd think that Epstein was at Mar-a-lago.
Si"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You'd think that Epstein was at Mar-a-lago.
Biden has nothing to do with this.
That is the purpose of the Special Counsel; to avoid the appearance of any conflict of interest and bias.
Think what you want. It's the truth.Even you can't be that stupid
WAIT!
Who told you they tried to turn off the cameras?No it's not.If you didn't take any steps afterwards then there is no law broken.
If they had followed thru on his orders then they would have been possibly guilty of a criminal conspiracy.
However, it's still debatable that he even gave the order in the first place, considering the fact that the FBI tried to shut off the cameras when they started the raid. If anything, they were attempting to obstruct justice, not Trump:
By Wendy N. Whitman Cobb
![]()
Though thinking about committing illegal acts is not illegal, conspiracy laws can only be enforced when one takes a step beyond merely planning the act and toward execution of the crime. Eugene Dennis, General Secretary of the Communist Party USA, and other members of the party were convicted of conspiring to teach or advocate the violent overthrow of the government. (Photo by the US Library of Congress, public domain)
The application of conspiracy laws requires a tacit agreement among members of a group to commit a crime. Such laws allow the government to charge a defendant regardless of whether the planned criminal act has been committed or the possibility of the crime being carried out successfully.
Conspiracy laws can only be enforced after individuals take steps beyond planning a crime
It is not illegal to think about committing illegal acts — such as in the case of civil disobedience — as any law that would criminalize the mere thought or suggestion of committing an illegal act would be a free speech violation.
Conspiracy laws can only be enforced after individuals take an initial step beyond planning and toward execution of an illegal deed. An individual who has agreed to participate in a crime is not required to know everyone involved in the plot in order to be charged with conspiracy.
![]()
Conspiracy Laws
There are concerns about conspiracy laws interfering with First Amendment rights by allowing governments to crack down on those who disagree with the positions of the state.www.mtsu.edu
Psst... none of them disqualify him from running. The reality is that we've seen so many of these things for so long that they not only don't hurt his polling, they enhance it. Keep 'em comin'. At this rate, he'll sweep the electoral college...New charges. And any day now, there is a third indictment on the way. Not to mention a fourth one very soon.
This is what happens when you're dealing with a corrupt prosecutor.What has he got to hide ? We all know he is innocent.
If you believe that bull shit then you're even dumber than you appear to be.Biden has nothing to do with this.
That is the purpose of the Special Counsel; to avoid the appearance of any conflict of interest and bias.
Is trump above the law ?This is what happens when you're dealing with a corrupt prosecutor.
Only thing stopping him is an honest judge.
This IS......ISISISISISISIS.....about trump being corrupt.....duh.Progs are not held to any standard. This is not about Trump being corrupted. It is about globalism.
Agreed MagicMikeFelony indictments so far:
Hillary Clinton. 0
Donald Trump. 74
Yet more proof that the system is corrupt.Felony indictments so far:
Hillary Clinton. 0
Donald Trump. 74
No. If he was they wouldn't bother indicting him every chance they get.Is trump above the law ?
"Donald Trump is running to stay out of prison."Psst... none of them disqualify him from running. The reality is that we've seen so many of these things for so long that they not only don't hurt his polling, they enhance it. Keep 'em comin'. At this rate, he'll sweep the electoral college...
You mean like Hillary deleted 30,000 emails and wiped several devices clean?Trump charged with seeking to delete security footage in documents case
Federal prosecutors announced new charges against Donald Trump in his alleged hoarding and hiding of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home, alleging the former president and a newly-charged aide tried to keep security camera footage from being reviewed by investigators.
Trump was also hit with a fresh charge, in addition to the 31 counts he already faces, of illegally retaining national defense information.
The indictment charges that Trump and two aides, Waltine “Walt” Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, requested that another Trump employee "delete security camera footage at the Mar-a-Lago Club to prevent the footage from being provided to a federal grand jury.”
De Oliveira is the second Trump aide to be charged in the documents case. Nauta was indicted alongside Trump in June, accused of helping the former president mislead investigators as they sought to retrieve all of the classified documents that remained at the former president’s home and private club after he left the White House.
New charges. And any day now, there is a third indictment on the way. Not to mention a fourth one very soon.
Do you actually have any idea what you’re talking about?You mean like Hillary deleted 30,000 emails and wiped several devices clean?
Actually just more proof that Trump is a piece of shit.Yet more proof that the system is corrupt.
Thanks for proving our point.
So, you're admitting that there is a two tiered justice system? Don't prosecute Democrats but prosecute Republicans?Yeah, like that. Were you ok with that?
Who told you that democrats aren’t prosecuted?So, you're admitting that there is a two tiered justice system? Don't prosecute Democrats but prosecute Republicans?
Do you think that "unfair justice" whine is going to go very far with the juries and judges in Trump's multiple trials.So, you're admitting that there is a two tiered justice system? Don't prosecute Democrats but prosecute Republicans?