New Zealand: First They Took Their Guns.....Now They're Removing Jesus From Their Lives

The onus was not because the women is question was Indian, but because she was a fraud, because she was NOT Indian.
You avoided saying what your wife and siblings thought about 'Pocahontas' being used to deride.
 
"One week after a white supremacist gunman opened fire inside two mosques, killing 50 people, the entire country observed a Muslim call to prayer. The event was televised nationwide. "
At a Muslim religious service, you ineducable Cracker.


Observed nation wide.


And shove your racism up your ass, fucktard.
It was entirely voluntary...a bit like praising Jesus in Parliament really


Even if true, in no way addresses my point.


Oh, do you have a problem with racist slurs that cnm is doing, or should your defense of him be considered to be a defense of anti-white racism too?
I wasn't defending anyone...I was addressing what I thought was your point.
 
So, when the nation observed the Muslim Call to Prayer, was there multiple references to the many other religions in New Zealand?
It was at a Muslim religious service. You're demented in your self victimisation.


From the op, you hypocrite.



"One week after a white supremacist gunman opened fire inside two mosques, killing 50 people, the entire country observed a Muslim call to prayer. The event was televised nationwide. "


Like I said, liberal tolerance. Islam gets celebrated, while Christianity is purged.


I believe you engage in misinformation (and lies, really) when you say "liberals slam christians"

Many liberals (the majority?) are christians, themselves. They just happen to be more LIBERAL christians. It would be more accurate and honest to say liberals slam CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS.

The thing is....
when you slam liberals who consider themselves CHRISTIANS you, yourself, are "slamming christians"......just not CONSERVATIVE christians.


You do understand that NOT ALL CHRISTIANS are fundies?
do you?

or not?
 
"One week after a white supremacist gunman opened fire inside two mosques, killing 50 people, the entire country observed a Muslim call to prayer. The event was televised nationwide. "
At a Muslim religious service, you ineducable Cracker.


Observed nation wide.


And shove your racism up your ass, fucktard.
It was entirely voluntary...a bit like praising Jesus in Parliament really


Even if true, in no way addresses my point.


Oh, do you have a problem with racist slurs that cnm is doing, or should your defense of him be considered to be a defense of anti-white racism too?
I wasn't defending anyone...I was addressing what I thought was your point.


My point was the hypocrisy of the Left, talking shit about tolerance, while celebrating Islam while purging Christianity.


You read cnm's racist post. Do you have anything to say about his overt racism?
 
New Zealand banned guns, (wrong) and now they banned Jesus (which also is a lie). This whole thread is lie, esp the title.
This is just the start, Banning firearms...
Socialism is all about control and that is always the starting point
 
and Billy Graham started out holding tent meeting in Farm fields in the late 40s i believe Lysis
But who gives a shit? Billy (dead now) and frankie can do what they want. Why do any of the rest of us have to care?
True, New Zealand can do whatever they want… I don’t give two shits.
But that doesn’t change the fact that the socialist countries always start by banning firearms.
Socialism is the perfect incubator for dictatorship
 
So, when the nation observed the Muslim Call to Prayer, was there multiple references to the many other religions in New Zealand?
It was at a Muslim religious service. You're demented in your self victimisation.


From the op, you hypocrite.



"One week after a white supremacist gunman opened fire inside two mosques, killing 50 people, the entire country observed a Muslim call to prayer. The event was televised nationwide. "


Like I said, liberal tolerance. Islam gets celebrated, while Christianity is purged.


I believe you engage in misinformation (and lies, really) when you say "liberals slam christians"

Many liberals (the majority?) are christians, themselves. They just happen to be more LIBERAL christians. It would be more accurate and honest to say liberals slam CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS.

The thing is....
when you slam liberals who consider themselves CHRISTIANS you, yourself, are "slamming christians"......just not CONSERVATIVE christians.


You do understand that NOT ALL CHRISTIANS are fundies?
do you?

or not?



When I slam liberals for what they say or do, I am not slamming "christians" in that I am not slamming them for BEING christians.


When the New Zealand government purges Christianity from the public prayer, as it did, it is denying the heritage and faith of New Zealand Christians BECAUSE they are Christians.


if they were Muslims, their faith was and is, and will be publicly celebrated.


Different rules for different folks.


It is called religious discrimination.
 
It does mention it and condemn it, but it doesn't call for violent action.

The New Testament says that homosexuality is a “shameful lust” (Romans 1:26), a “shameful act,” an abandonment of “natural relations” (Romans 1:27), a “wrongdoing” (1 Corinthians 6:9), and “sexual immorality and perversion” (Jude 1:7). Homosexuality carries a “due penalty” (Romans 1:27), “is contrary to the sound doctrine” (1 Timothy 1:10), and is listed among the sins that bar people from the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9). Despite the attempts of some to downplay these verses, the Bible could not be clearer that homosexuality is a sin against God.


doesn't call for VIOLENT action?

"shall be put to death"
"by stoning"
"suffer not a witch to live"
---------------------------------------------------------- and thats Ancient history not practiced by any Christian in the USA or the Western world . Course , muslims do the VIOLENCE all the time in present times as they follow the RULES of 'mo' AnyN .
It's fortunate that the USA and the "Western world" are secular then, isn't it?
That "oppression of Christians" thing has kept us all safer.
20 Commandments of Mohammad the founder of Islam
1. Thou shall Rape, Marry, and Divorce Pre-pubescent Girls. Koran 65:4
2. Thou shall have Sex Slaves and Work Slaves. Koran 4:3, 4:24, 5:89, 33:50, 58:3, 70:30
3. Thou shall Beat Sex Slaves, Work Slaves, and Wives. Koran 4:34
4. Thou shall have 4 Muslim male witnesses to prove rape. Koran 24:13
5. Thou shall Kill those who insult Islam or Mohammed. Koran 33:57
6. Thou shall Crucify and Amputate non-Muslims. Koran 8:12, 47:4
7. Thou shall Kill non-Muslims to guarantee receiving 72 virgins in heaven. Koran 9:111
8. Thou shall Kill anyone who leaves Islam. Koran 2:217, 4:89
9. Thou shall Behead non-Muslims. Koran 8:12, 47:4
10. Thou shall Kill AND be Killed for Islamic Allah. Koran 9:5
11. Thou shall Terrorize non-Muslims. Koran 8:12, 8:60
12. Thou shall Steal and Rob from non-Muslims. Koran Chapter 8 (Booty/Spoils of War)
13. Thou shall Lie to Strengthen Islam. Koran 3:28, 16:106
14. Thou shall Fight non-Muslim even if you don't want to. Koran 2:216
15. Thou shall not take non-Muslims as friends. Koran 5:51
16. Thou shall Call non-Muslims Pigs and Apes. Koran 5:60, 7:166, 16:106
17. Thou shall Treat non-Muslims as the vilest creatures deserving no mercy. Koran 98:6
18. Thou shall Treat non-Muslims as sworn enemies. Koran 4:101
19. Thou shall Kill non-Muslims for not converting to Islam. Koran 9:29
20. Thou shall Extort non-Muslims to keep Islam strong. Koran 9:29.

What does this have to do with altering the parliamentary prayer? It seems that there are plenty of churches, mosques, synagogues, and temples to worship in.
0e1680_135811c128e34aafb635045c91726327.jpg
 
The onus was not because the women is question was Indian, but because she was a fraud, because she was NOT Indian.
You avoided saying what your wife and siblings thought about 'Pocahontas' being used to deride.


1. You are confusing me with someone else.

2. And you are dodging the point. Cowardly.
My apologies.

The point is Indian names are used to deride in the US. It is quite plain to see.
 
You leftards are the same across the Western World. Same stupid shit you believe and say and do.
So, none of our people. You could have just said.


You are on this site, commenting on issues NOT limited to New Zealand, and taking sides in the ideological debate, between people all across the Western World.


I never see you say, this issue has nothing to deal with New Zealand, so I have no opinion on it.


You are happy to jump right in.


Because the liberals on this site are more your people, than your "fellow" New Zealand Christians who have a problem with Christianity being purged from the public prayer.


Your denial of this is not fooling ANYONE.
 
The onus was not because the women is question was Indian, but because she was a fraud, because she was NOT Indian.
You avoided saying what your wife and siblings thought about 'Pocahontas' being used to deride.


1. You are confusing me with someone else.

2. And you are dodging the point. Cowardly.
My apologies.

The point is Indian names are used to deride in the US. It is quite plain to see.
------------------------------------ FREE Speech CNM .
 
"Waaaaah, if they dont say Jaysus in the parliamentary prayer, then they are forcing Jaysus out of everyone's lives!"


Fuckin stupid nonsense...
They are just another society that when Jesus teachings kicks the shit out of their comfort zone, Much like Jesus overturning the tables in the temple...

They have to get rid of things that make them uncomfortable...
 
In a country with vastly different religious beliefs like New Zealand, government should be neutral otherwise it invites accusations of religious discrimination and stirs up hatred. However, I think the timing of this decision is bad.
Yeah, gods should be ignored by politicians while conducting national business.
I got a better idea, how about politicians fear the citizens… LOL
 
The onus was not because the women is question was Indian, but because she was a fraud, because she was NOT Indian.
You avoided saying what your wife and siblings thought about 'Pocahontas' being used to deride.


1. You are confusing me with someone else.

2. And you are dodging the point. Cowardly.
My apologies.

The point is Indian names are used to deride in the US. It is quite plain to see.


It is?


Well, you have given ONE fairly unconvincing example. Got a second?
 
You read cnm's racist post. Do you have anything to say about his overt racism?
I love the way the snowflake self victimisation never ends.
Anyway...

"In official documents, the governor of Florida said, 'We don't know what to do with these crackers — we tell them to settle this area and they don't; we tell them not to settle this area and they do," Ste. Claire said. "They lived off the land. They were rogues."

By the early 1800s, those immigrants to the South started to refer to themselves that way as a badge of honor and a term of endearment. (I'm pretty sure this process of reappropriating a disparaging term sounds familiar to a lot of y'all.)
The Secret History Of The Word 'Cracker'
 
You read cnm's racist post. Do you have anything to say about his overt racism?
I love the way the snowflake self victimisation never ends.
Anyway...

"In official documents, the governor of Florida said, 'We don't know what to do with these crackers — we tell them to settle this area and they don't; we tell them not to settle this area and they do," Ste. Claire said. "They lived off the land. They were rogues."


By the early 1800s, those immigrants to the South started to refer to themselves that way as a badge of honor and a term of endearment. (I'm pretty sure this process of reappropriating a disparaging term sounds familiar to a lot of y'all.)
The Secret History Of The Word 'Cracker'


You were obviously NOT using it as a term of endearment, you racist ass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top