Next up on the Sexual Misconduct Parade - Al Franken!

all it takes is "I'm sorry?" Then maybe that's what Roy Moore needs to do. Just say "I don't ever recall doing any of these things that I'm being accused of, but if I did...I'm sorry!" If it's good enough for the dirty demorats, it's good enough for conservatives.
That would have been the more honorable route. Say it was a different time back then and to take teenage girls on dates was not out of the norm. Apologize if he did anything to make any of the girls feel uncomfortable and own it like a man. Seek reparations between himself and his accusers. But no he is playing the denial game and attacking the accusers. Scum.
or simply, he didn't do what he is accused of. and no one can prove it 38 years later, all records are gone. again, the voters will decide. unless you are one, you have no comment worth anything here.

"again, the voters will decide. unless you are one, you have no comment worth anything here."

100% wrong. He is running to be a federal legislator, and that affects everyone. Secondly, all of our own senators may have to vote to throw him out of the Senate. So every American has a dog in this fight.
Ok, and based on what he did do you think that deserves his resignation or impeachment?

Yes, I think molesting a 14 year old qualifies. That accusation is easier to believe, given the other women coming forward, and the corroborating info from other sources.
I’m talking about Franken, not Moore
 
That would have been the more honorable route. Say it was a different time back then and to take teenage girls on dates was not out of the norm. Apologize if he did anything to make any of the girls feel uncomfortable and own it like a man. Seek reparations between himself and his accusers. But no he is playing the denial game and attacking the accusers. Scum.
or simply, he didn't do what he is accused of. and no one can prove it 38 years later, all records are gone. again, the voters will decide. unless you are one, you have no comment worth anything here.

"again, the voters will decide. unless you are one, you have no comment worth anything here."

100% wrong. He is running to be a federal legislator, and that affects everyone. Secondly, all of our own senators may have to vote to throw him out of the Senate. So every American has a dog in this fight.
Ok, and based on what he did do you think that deserves his resignation or impeachment?

Yes, I think molesting a 14 year old qualifies. That accusation is easier to believe, given the other women coming forward, and the corroborating info from other sources.
I’m talking about Franken, not Moore

If the story of him forcing his tongue into her mouth is true, then yes, he should go yesterday. If not, then no.
 
It's like groping somebody through a suit of armor. Nobody would do that for a cheap thrill, meaning it had to be a joke.

Or to humiliate her for rejecting his earlier aggressive advances

While asking his brother to photograph it? You don't ask close relatives to record incriminating evidence, unless your name is Tony Soprano.
You do if you're the dumbest comedian in the business. One would think a Hollywood producer wouldn't masturbate in front of an actress as well.
 
Did anybody bother to analyze the Franken photograph?

Franken is looking at the camera
His hands are hovering over her flak jacket
You can practically hear Franken say "Take the picture already"
His hands aren't "hovering." They are touching.
 
or simply, he didn't do what he is accused of. and no one can prove it 38 years later, all records are gone. again, the voters will decide. unless you are one, you have no comment worth anything here.

"again, the voters will decide. unless you are one, you have no comment worth anything here."

100% wrong. He is running to be a federal legislator, and that affects everyone. Secondly, all of our own senators may have to vote to throw him out of the Senate. So every American has a dog in this fight.
Ok, and based on what he did do you think that deserves his resignation or impeachment?

Yes, I think molesting a 14 year old qualifies. That accusation is easier to believe, given the other women coming forward, and the corroborating info from other sources.
I’m talking about Franken, not Moore

If the story of him forcing his tongue into her mouth is true, then yes, he should go yesterday. If not, then no.
So under the same precedent would it be fair to assume that you think Trump should be impeached for his history of grabbing pussies and kissing girls without asking?
 
His hands are hovering over her flak jacket
You can practically hear Franken say "Take the picture already"
His hands aren't "hovering." They are touching.

img_5766.jpg


And she just punched her.
 
"again, the voters will decide. unless you are one, you have no comment worth anything here."

100% wrong. He is running to be a federal legislator, and that affects everyone. Secondly, all of our own senators may have to vote to throw him out of the Senate. So every American has a dog in this fight.
Ok, and based on what he did do you think that deserves his resignation or impeachment?

Yes, I think molesting a 14 year old qualifies. That accusation is easier to believe, given the other women coming forward, and the corroborating info from other sources.
I’m talking about Franken, not Moore

If the story of him forcing his tongue into her mouth is true, then yes, he should go yesterday. If not, then no.
So under the same precedent would it be fair to assume that you think Trump should be impeached for his history of grabbing pussies and kissing girls without asking?

No, unfortunately, because such a process does not exist for impeachment of a President.

I think he should be impeached for being completely unfit to be President. But that's a pipe dream.

The only paths to impeachment of Trump I see are overwhelming evidence that he committed obstruction of justice, and the military brass refusing an order from him.
 
Last edited:
It's like groping somebody through a suit of armor. Nobody would do that for a cheap thrill, meaning it had to be a joke.

Or to humiliate her for rejecting his earlier aggressive advances

While asking his brother to photograph it? You don't ask close relatives to record incriminating evidence, unless your name is Tony Soprano.

He didn't think it was any big deal, so why would he be worried about that?
 
It means Franken wasn't "caught in the act" he staged the act.

Nobody has EVER claimed that, so why are you spreading BS?

Franken isn't fighting that what he did was in bad taste, so he's not making excuses.

But if you analyze the photograph it's clear what happened. Look at where Franken is looking, look at the shadows under Franken fingers, look at the lack of deformation in the flak jacket.

It all shows what happened, if you're willing to put on your Sherlock Holmes glasses.

Look with your eyes, not with your politics.
 
Not a single Republican (much less a Democrat) - not 1 - has called on Franken to resign. There is a lot of profundity right there that explains our entire political system now.
 
It means Franken wasn't "caught in the act" he staged the act.

Nobody has EVER claimed that, so why are you spreading BS?

Franken isn't fighting that what he did was in bad taste, so he's not making excuses.

But if you analyze the photograph it's clear what happened. Look at where Franken is looking, look at the shadows under Franken fingers, look at the lack of deformation in the flak jacket.

It all shows what happened, if you're willing to put on your Sherlock Holmes glasses.

Look with your eyes, not with your politics.

I told you, there are multiple pictures.

He posed for the picture. We know that.

Flak jackets don't flex. That's the idea!

Now, is there anything else you want to screw up?
 
Did anybody bother to analyze the Franken photograph?

Franken is looking at the camera
His hands are hovering over her flak jacket
You can practically hear Franken say "Take the picture already"

So?

It means Franken wasn't "caught in the act" he staged the act.

Your theory isn't plausible. Where was the punch line if she was in on it? A joke for who? They showed it to no one. If she was in on it, why was she playing unconscious? That certainly seems less funny than conscious. Why didn't either one say it was a joke or the escort that was supposedly there? Doesn't make sense, especially with the apllogy.
 
Flak jackets don't flex. That's the idea!

Now, is there anything else you want to screw up?

Flak jackets are made out of kevlar, not the old fiberglass of vietnam.
And except for the optional ballistic plates they're made to be flexible. In fact, presidents wear kevlar body armor, and you can't even tell.
 
Flak jackets don't flex. That's the idea!

Now, is there anything else you want to screw up?

Flak jackets are made out of kevlar, not the old fiberglass of vietnam.
And except for the optional ballistic plates they're made to be flexible. In fact, presidents wear kevlar body armor, and you can't even tell.

Excuse me, but when was the last time you wore one?

You continue to prove that your only worth on this forum is to be a bad example for others.
 

Forum List

Back
Top