Jarlaxle
Gold Member
Unless you are driving a unibody Smart Car. Those are stronger than a 69' Nova according to Jarlaxie.
Yer dumb as a terd, boy.
Note: this car is unit-body:
![33070330001_original.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fcarphotos.cardomain.com%2Fride_images%2F3%2F3229%2F661%2F33070330001_original.jpg%3Fv%3D0&hash=1bc195c32025f288c1234a632f9cc0b1)
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless you are driving a unibody Smart Car. Those are stronger than a 69' Nova according to Jarlaxie.
Many of them on larger vehicles are ALWAYS operating. Seen it on several motorhomes.
Jesus how stupid. They'll have KIAs costing 50k with all this crap.
[
Last but not least, if you ever are hit your risk of injury is considerably less in a big, heavy car than in a smaller, lighter one.
Unless you are driving a unibody Smart Car. Those are stronger than a 69' Nova according to Jarlaxie.
Yer dumb as a terd, boy.
Note: this car is unit-body:
![]()
It is optional on our Cruze for $250 and worth every cent of it.
Hell - if it's all about saving lives, lets lower the speed limit to 55. We did that in 1974 and immediately saved 9000 lives and saved money too.
Many of them on larger vehicles are ALWAYS operating. Seen it on several motorhomes.
That certainly does not mean we need them on all cars, even those with a rear view mirror.
It is optional on our Cruze for $250 and worth every cent of it.
Are you the guy in the car commercial who can't parallel park?
Unless you are driving a unibody Smart Car. Those are stronger than a 69' Nova according to Jarlaxie.
Yer dumb as a terd, boy.
Note: this car is unit-body:
![]()
Bad idea. I've driven Class B trucks with cameras at the rear. They're actually a real distraction and can cause more problems then they solve. I NEVER used it. If I wasn't sure what was behind the truck I would simply get out and look. Looking at an in-dash TV screen takes the eyes off of the road and the areas surrounding the vehicle.
The vehicle has to be in reverse for the camera to operate. If your eyes are on the road you are looking in the wrong direction.
Unless you are driving a unibody Smart Car. Those are stronger than a 69' Nova according to Jarlaxie.
Yer dumb as a terd, boy.
Note: this car is unit-body:
![]()
So is a 69 Nova moron. Case and point you are clueless.
Ahh excellent, your vast experience purchasing and installing rear-view cameras for manufacturers who makes millions of cars comes into play, thanks for giving us the real scoop.They say it will cost $140!!! HAHAHA. It will be at least 5 times that
Hell - if it's all about saving lives, lets lower the speed limit to 55. We did that in 1974 and immediately saved 9000 lives and saved money too.
It will add to unemployment.
Poor attempt at idiot-proofing. Idiots will still drive like idiots. Death/injury stats won't change much. Herd will continue to get thinned; it'll just up the price for those of us who drive defensively.
Since motor vehicles kill hundreds of times as many as do guns then why in Hell aren't the gun-haters also demanding those killer machines be banned?