No better time for Mueller to subpoena Trump

Not only were most of the hi-jackers Saudis, but Bin Laden was closely tied to the same Royal Family you now defend.

ANd then there's the fact that radical muslims seem to be all over that nation...
 
From Fox News

For decades European and U.S. leaders bit their tongues while the Saudi governments spent billions of dollars indoctrinating Sunni Muslim communities around the world in extremist ideology in the web of mosques and schools Riyadh supports. During this time, the West was hit time and again with terrorist attacks in which the taint of extremist Islam was clearly a factor.
 
Everyone has ties to the Saudis, you dumb ass. We're business partners and it's in our interest. Man, you are one ignorant loopy loo.


Even among the ignorant right wing cadre on this forum, you rank (both meanings) as one of the DUMBEST.......

(check out how many terrorists on 9-11 were Saudis......or ask a grownup for help.)
The fact that 9/11 terrorists were Saudi means absolutely nothing. There are Nazis that are American citizens. There are gangsters that are American citizens. Does that mean in your feeble intellect that the American government and business is run by Nazis and gangsters? What an idiot. You read something off a leftist political site and you run with it. You're like a two-year old playing with dynamite and matches.
Keep watching FOX lies and bs How much is trump making from his saudi friends ? Once more look up what the emolument clause says
 
Not only were most of the hi-jackers Saudis, but Bin Laden was closely tied to the same Royal Family you now defend.

ANd then there's the fact that radical muslims seem to be all over that nation...
But that doesn't mean that the Saudi royal family supports terrorism. You can't make that case. You don't really care about Islamic terrorism, unless you can use it to hurt Trump. You guys are so phoney.
 
Not only were most of the hi-jackers Saudis, but Bin Laden was closely tied to the same Royal Family you now defend.

ANd then there's the fact that radical muslims seem to be all over that nation...
But that doesn't mean that the Saudi royal family supports terrorism. You can't make that case. You don't really care about Islamic terrorism, unless you can use it to hurt Trump. You guys are so phoney.
And Trump believes the Saudis rather than our CIA ?? Seems trump always believes the bad guys Can't understand why Republicans can't get a handle on that loose cannon in our WH Can they be stupid and believe all the lies?
 
Not only were most of the hi-jackers Saudis, but Bin Laden was closely tied to the same Royal Family you now defend.

ANd then there's the fact that radical muslims seem to be all over that nation...
But that doesn't mean that the Saudi royal family supports terrorism. You can't make that case. You don't really care about Islamic terrorism, unless you can use it to hurt Trump. You guys are so phoney.
The point is...they are not to be trusted...but you do. Why? Because the Orange Blotus tells you to
 
When you think about it, this may be an excellent time for Mueller to issue a subpoena to Trump for him to verbally and under oath address the questions posed by the investigative team.......

There are 3 reasons to substantiate why the time is optimum:

First, the midterm elections are virtually over and no one can claim that the DOJ is interfering with voters' opinions....as Comey had done to Clinton days before the 2016 election.

Second, the written answers submitted by Trump to Mueller's questions....... (with the laughable side comment that Trump took out his crayons and wrote the answers on his own).........most likely indicate plenty of reasons for follow-up questions that are the norm for any prosecutor.

Third....and perhaps most important......the stupid attacks that Trump has issued against the judiciary (an EQUAL branch of our governmental system) has prompted Chief Justice Roberts to slam Trump for his moronic thinking that ALL governing entities are nothing more than his stooges, there ONLY to follow his wishes.

Interesting days ahead to see if democracy can survive the scourge of this orange charlatan.
Thank you for number 3.
 
Not only were most of the hi-jackers Saudis, but Bin Laden was closely tied to the same Royal Family you now defend.

ANd then there's the fact that radical muslims seem to be all over that nation...
But that doesn't mean that the Saudi royal family supports terrorism. You can't make that case. You don't really care about Islamic terrorism, unless you can use it to hurt Trump. You guys are so phoney.
And Trump believes the Saudis rather than our CIA ?? Seems trump always believes the bad guys Can't understand why Republicans can't get a handle on that loose cannon in our WH Can they be stupid and believe all the lies?
Blah, blah, I hate Trump....
 
Not only were most of the hi-jackers Saudis, but Bin Laden was closely tied to the same Royal Family you now defend.

ANd then there's the fact that radical muslims seem to be all over that nation...
But that doesn't mean that the Saudi royal family supports terrorism. You can't make that case. You don't really care about Islamic terrorism, unless you can use it to hurt Trump. You guys are so phoney.
The point is...they are not to be trusted...but you do. Why? Because the Orange Blotus tells you to
Blah, blah, blah, I hate Trump.
 
1. Clinton had already lost the election before Comey made any announcements.
2. Meh
3. Whatever

?? Polling clearly shows critical drop off for Hillary after Comey’s announcement of “re-opening” of Clinton email investigation just a week out from voting.
I think it had an effect but it didn't cost her the election as she claims. It was already over for her.
 
Honestly speaking I like what you say but I'd do handstands to see his 2 children indicted along with Kutchner

You're so "cruel".......You know that Ivanka would be denied those expensive shoes were she to be jailed......lol
YOU really have to hand it to the trump family The slimmest pieces of shit in the country and now President?? Thanks republicans
Your Welcome! It's all good.
Good?? That vile lying nasty self serving POS is good for America?? You're either bonkers or just lying Your choice
It is all good. Anyone can see the improvement of the country under Trump. Most people are happy with the president and if you're not it's because you're out of touch with your fellow Americans. Or you also realize that things are better and it's killing you.
 
I think it had an effect but it didn't cost her the election as she claims. It was already over for her.


Moron.....Hillary STILL managed to get over 3 million Americans more to vote for her..

LOL
 
1. Clinton had already lost the election before Comey made any announcements.
2. Meh
3. Whatever

?? Polling clearly shows critical drop off for Hillary after Comey’s announcement of “re-opening” of Clinton email investigation just a week out from voting.
I think it had an effect but it didn't cost her the election as she claims. It was already over for her.

In PA/MI/WA margin of win for Trump was 0.5%.

Now you go ahead and tell me with a straight face that Comey's announcement of re-opening the email case on "crooked Hillary" did not have a 0.5%+ effect.
 
I think it had an effect but it didn't cost her the election as she claims. It was already over for her.


Moron.....Hillary STILL managed to get over 3 million Americans more to vote for her..

LOL
Thanks to the wisdom of our founders you have to win more than California and New York. Hillary was rejected by most of the country.
 
When you think about it, this may be an excellent time for Mueller to issue a subpoena to Trump for him to verbally and under oath address the questions posed by the investigative team.......

There are 3 reasons to substantiate why the time is optimum:

First, the midterm elections are virtually over and no one can claim that the DOJ is interfering with voters' opinions....as Comey had done to Clinton days before the 2016 election.

Second, the written answers submitted by Trump to Mueller's questions....... (with the laughable side comment that Trump took out his crayons and wrote the answers on his own).........most likely indicate plenty of reasons for follow-up questions that are the norm for any prosecutor.

Third....and perhaps most important......the stupid attacks that Trump has issued against the judiciary (an EQUAL branch of our governmental system) has prompted Chief Justice Roberts to slam Trump for his moronic thinking that ALL governing entities are nothing more than his stooges, there ONLY to follow his wishes.

Interesting days ahead to see if democracy can survive the scourge of this orange charlatan.


Trump's never going to get in front of the Grand Jury or Mueller to answer questions.

Here's why:

 
1. Clinton had already lost the election before Comey made any announcements.
2. Meh
3. Whatever

?? Polling clearly shows critical drop off for Hillary after Comey’s announcement of “re-opening” of Clinton email investigation just a week out from voting.
I think it had an effect but it didn't cost her the election as she claims. It was already over for her.

In PA/MI/WA margin of win for Trump was 0.5%.

Now you go ahead and tell me with a straight face that Comey's announcement of re-opening the email case on "crooked Hillary" did not have a 0.5%+ effect.


So is Comey the bad guy or good guy today?



Was it obstruction of Justice to fire him for fucking up an election?



.

.
 
When you think about it, this may be an excellent time for Mueller to issue a subpoena to Trump for him to verbally and under oath address the questions posed by the investigative team.......

There are 3 reasons to substantiate why the time is optimum:

First, the midterm elections are virtually over and no one can claim that the DOJ is interfering with voters' opinions....as Comey had done to Clinton days before the 2016 election.

Second, the written answers submitted by Trump to Mueller's questions....... (with the laughable side comment that Trump took out his crayons and wrote the answers on his own).........most likely indicate plenty of reasons for follow-up questions that are the norm for any prosecutor.

Third....and perhaps most important......the stupid attacks that Trump has issued against the judiciary (an EQUAL branch of our governmental system) has prompted Chief Justice Roberts to slam Trump for his moronic thinking that ALL governing entities are nothing more than his stooges, there ONLY to follow his wishes.

Interesting days ahead to see if democracy can survive the scourge of this orange charlatan.


Trump's never going to get in front of the Grand Jury or Mueller to answer questions.

Here's why:




No the reason is the left hated comey but now using his firing to get even with Trump


You can't have it both ways .


.
 
1. Clinton had already lost the election before Comey made any announcements.
2. Meh
3. Whatever

?? Polling clearly shows critical drop off for Hillary after Comey’s announcement of “re-opening” of Clinton email investigation just a week out from voting.
I think it had an effect but it didn't cost her the election as she claims. It was already over for her.

In PA/MI/WA margin of win for Trump was 0.5%.

Now you go ahead and tell me with a straight face that Comey's announcement of re-opening the email case on "crooked Hillary" did not have a 0.5%+ effect.

So is Comey the bad guy or good guy today?

Was it obstruction of Justice to fire him for fucking up an election?
.

Trump did not fire him because he fucked up an election in Trumps favor (although that’s what the firing letter penned by Rosenstein states).

In fact he went on TV a few days after nobody believed him and straight up admitted that the firing was over “this Russia thing”

Trump fired Comey because he refused to pledge him loyalty and refused to squash an investigation at Trump’s request.
 
1. Clinton had already lost the election before Comey made any announcements.
2. Meh
3. Whatever

?? Polling clearly shows critical drop off for Hillary after Comey’s announcement of “re-opening” of Clinton email investigation just a week out from voting.
I think it had an effect but it didn't cost her the election as she claims. It was already over for her.

In PA/MI/WA margin of win for Trump was 0.5%.

Now you go ahead and tell me with a straight face that Comey's announcement of re-opening the email case on "crooked Hillary" did not have a 0.5%+ effect.

So is Comey the bad guy or good guy today?

Was it obstruction of Justice to fire him for fucking up an election?
.

Trump did not fire him because he fucked up an election in Trumps favor (although that’s what the firing letter penned by Rosenstein states).

In fact he went on TV a few days after nobody believed him and straight up admitted that the firing was over “this Russia thing”

Trump fired Comey because he refused to pledge him loyalty and refused to squash an investigation at Trump’s request.


Okie dokie, so do you love Comey today or not?



.
 
Thanks to the wisdom of our founders you have to win more than California and New York. Hillary was rejected by most of the country.

Thanks to the wisdom of our founders, every two years we CORRECT the mistakes made by the dumbest voters that democracy sometime elicits......lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top