NO! Homosexuality IS NOT NORMAL

You're right, it's not Normal, that's 50% + 1, it's just Natural, and has been around as long as we have as far as we can tell.
So has blindness.
Yep, and you don't try to outlaw that now do you? You also don't spend much effort denouncing it as immoral either.
I never claimed homos to be immoral. That's the argument the homonazis want. My argument is grounded in social science and logic.
You don't give drivers licenses to blind people.
That is because you can make a rational and compelling argument before the court. What is the rational and compelling argument for two same-sex adults not being able to marry? The court couldn't find one, and neither could anyone else.

There are only 2 I can think of - Religious (which won't be considered) and historical (permissiveness of homosexuality) which I don't know enough to speak on (I have read in various places of downfalls of society due to increased sexual perversion but don't have info to support that at the tip of my fingers or brain).
You missed the most significant objections of all; 1) contributing to depleted family structure and the social decay that causes and 2) the coerced subsidization of irrelevant personal behavior choices. Those two arguments alone, had they been made, would have prevented this travesty.
 
No one is saying "same sex" equals "opposite sex." That's why your strawman is a failure.
FALSE! 5 idiots on the SCOTUS are saying that (for purposes of marriage), "same sex" equals "opposite sex."
Yes, that's exactly what they've said.
 
Homosexuality is normal for homosexuals. They have a different view of things. That's the number one reason they should remain equal but separate.
 
You're right, it's not Normal, that's 50% + 1, it's just Natural, and has been around as long as we have as far as we can tell.

ROFL! No, scamp.

"Normal" is not the issue... the issue is the Standard which defines normality.

The Standard that defines human sexual normality rests in the human physiological design. Now in terms of sexual behavior, that design has provided for the standard which defines the sexual behavior common to 98% of the human species.

LOL! Yet there you; a shameful Relativist, homosexual are claiming that normal is 50%+1. Ya lyin' sot.
 
Homosexuality is normal for homosexuals. They have a different view of things. That's the number one reason they should remain equal but separate.

Yes and that view is that which is OKA: Delusion. Which is a lot of things... 'equal' however, is not one of them.
 
This is not normal and not as new achievment of civilization as american propaganda is trying to show it. Enough to read a Bible to be aware of it. Everybody knows the story of Sodom and Homorra, everybody knows that barbarians did such sins and now uncivilized nations think that murders, robberies, sex with animals, pedophilia and homosexuality is normal. So, USA is now one step closer to such nations.

Which nations think sex with animals is normal? You seem to be just a font of information about this stuff.

Which nations think murder is normal?

Tell me all about the story of Homorra?

LOL...
According to my sources in Europe such countries with permitted by law bestiality are Netherland and Belgium. If you want some more, try to seek around Asia and Africa, I suppose among them could be even nations or tribes practicing cannibalism, for example. Should US defeat the rights of cannibals to eat people or necrophilia to have sex with corpses?
Also, islamic nations think that killing people of other beliefs is not a sin. Now everybody can see the "true muslims" doing that in ISIS army.

Did't you read this story in the Bible? If not, try this, it will take about 10 minutes, I suppose.
 
Equal protection covers gender as well. In fact equal protection covers any person or persons who are sufficiently similar to any other person or persons.
Gays are not "sufficiently similar" to heterosexuals, and thereby might not be given EQUAL protection.

They are according to the Supreme Court. When you become a SCOTUS justice, let us know.
 
Do you really think a state could require driver's licenses in order to drive a car, but then only offer them to...?

... people with good vision and a sound means to reason?

Yes Gilligan, it turns out that blind people are not well suited to driving, just as those who lack the means to understand or care... the purpose of LANES, SIGNALS and the laws of physics precluding distinct matter from simultaneously occupying the same space.

Just as those who are sexually attracted to people of the same gender are not will suited for Marriage, because Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.
Imbecile...

Driving is not a right ... marriage is.
 
They did no such thing. They upheld the Constitution and protected the rights of American citizens, just like they're supposed to do. ?

5 dumheads went overboard, and extended equal protection to people who are anything but equal. 4 justices remained sane.
How can anybody be this retarded? It's not about whether or not gay equals straight ... it's about gays having equal rights to marry the person they love.

Don't worry, you're a conservative ... one expects you to understand.
 
No one is saying "same sex" equals "opposite sex." That's why your strawman is a failure.
FALSE! 5 idiots on the SCOTUS are saying that (for purposes of marriage), "same sex" equals "opposite sex."
Yes, that's exactly what they've said.
You're a fucking idiot.

Five Supreme Court justices is all that is required to render such a legally binding decision.

You don't have to like it. Who cares really? But you do have to live with it. :mm:
 
Driving is not a right ... marriage is.
Not always. Many states prohibit marriage between parties more closely related than second cousins. Also prohibited is bigamy and/or polygamy, no ?
 
How can anybody be this retarded? It's not about whether or not gay equals straight ... it's about gays having equal rights to marry the person they love.

Don't worry, you're a conservative ... one expects you to understand.

How can anybody be this retarded? It's about gays having equal rights to marry the person they love. Yes, but gays can't have equal rights, when they aren't equal to begin with.. Can you give equal rights to humans and horses to play the guitar ? You can't because they aren't equal, to the task of playing the guitar. Horses don't have the body parts necessary. Similarly, gays aren't equal to having the body parts necessary to be married. Not to each other that is.

Don't worry, you're a liberal ... no one expects you to understand :biggrin:
 
You're a fucking idiot.Five Supreme Court justices is all that is required to render such a legally binding decision.

You don't have to like it. Who cares really? But you do have to live with it. :mm:
I don't have to live with it, and I have no intention of living with it. For me, nothing whatsoever is changed. Queers are still the same deranged, lunatic perverts they always were. And you're still the same deranged lunatic, for accepting them, if not one of them yourself.
biggrin.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top