RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
You missed the most significant objections of all; 1) contributing to depleted family structure and the social decay that causes and 2) the coerced subsidization of irrelevant personal behavior choices. Those two arguments alone, had they been made, would have prevented this travesty.That is because you can make a rational and compelling argument before the court. What is the rational and compelling argument for two same-sex adults not being able to marry? The court couldn't find one, and neither could anyone else.I never claimed homos to be immoral. That's the argument the homonazis want. My argument is grounded in social science and logic.Yep, and you don't try to outlaw that now do you? You also don't spend much effort denouncing it as immoral either.So has blindness.You're right, it's not Normal, that's 50% + 1, it's just Natural, and has been around as long as we have as far as we can tell.
You don't give drivers licenses to blind people.
There are only 2 I can think of - Religious (which won't be considered) and historical (permissiveness of homosexuality) which I don't know enough to speak on (I have read in various places of downfalls of society due to increased sexual perversion but don't have info to support that at the tip of my fingers or brain).