Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
- May 3, 2011
- 102,224
- 36,251
You give me the hard data that shows how white college admittances have been reduced by any policy which allows backs to be admitted into universities.
Any policy that adds 200 points or more to a black student's SAT score will result in some non-black students being displaced.
That's not the hard data that you have been asked to present. .What abut the 200 points whites get for legacy admissions? Does that men black students are being displaced? You see unlike the 230 point claim, I have actually produced a policy that shows preference points that are provided. and they are provided to whites.
Lee's next slide shows three columns of numbers from a Princeton University study that tried to measure how race and ethnicity affect admissions by using SAT scores as a benchmark. It uses the term “bonus” to describe how many extra SAT points an applicant's race is worth. She points to the first column.
African Americans received a “bonus” of 230 points, Lee says.
She points to the second column.
“Hispanics received a bonus of 185 points.”
The last column draws gasps.
Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points — in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission.
“Do Asians need higher test scores? Is it harder for Asians to get into college? The answer is yes,” Lee says.
For Asian Americans, a changing landscape on college admissions
Asians are 5 percent of the overall population but 18.5 percent of Ivy league students. So just how tough is it really for Asians.? Or have they been race baited?
Princeton for example has 22 percent Asian students which is 4 times the population of Asians in this country, At Princeton Asians are admitted almost at a 3:1 rate over blacks. This is a classic case of white race baiting by pitting one minority group against another.
Race Demographics of Ivy League Schools
Asians are 5 percent of the overall population but 18.5 percent of Ivy league students. So just how tough is it really for Asians.?
If blacks get in with lower test scores/lower grades than Asians who are rejected, the percentage of Asians should be higher than 18.5%. Right?
That's not happening and it would not change the percentages of Asians getting in. You see, you were presented with facts about legacy points which yo refuse to believe because it benefits whites. Whites who score lower than everybody else on SAT tests. You refuse to accept that and think you cam force your bilge about low scoring blacks. SAT scores have been shown to have little relevance to being qualified for college. .There is no evidence that blacks with lower high school GPAS are getting into Ivy league schools ahead of Asians. And when 3 times the rate of your population are being accepted into 8 universities, there probably aren't many Asians getting rejected from those schools.
.
That's not happening
BS.
and it would not change the percentages of Asians getting in
Blacks get +230 points, Asians get -50 points.
Of course it changes the percentages getting in.
You see, you were presented with facts about legacy points which yo refuse to believe because it benefits whites.
I believe it benefits whites. Mostly.
By 73 points, according to your source.
Whites who score lower than everybody else on SAT tests.
Whites, on average, score higher than blacks, higher than "Hispanics", lower than Asians.