buckeye45_73
Lakhota's my *****
- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,611
- 7,103
- 1,130
First it's a stupid law that no one cares about or at most has to pay a fineIt has nothing to do with anyone being harmed or blackmail; and everything to do with trump failing to report money he spent on his campaign.Your example of a PAC is ludicrous. A PAC didn't pay to silence a porn star -- trump's personal attorney did. And he paid her $130,000; for which he plead guilty to violating campaign finance laws.LOLOLWrong.
That is a total misunderstanding not only of the campaign finance reform laws, but laws in general.
It does not matter at all if blackmail influences the outcome of an election.
There is no legal jurisdiction to prevent things from influencing the outcome of an election.
All there is under legal principles, is the authority to prevent one side from tying up all the media with huge hidden purchases of media time, by investors expecting a quid pro quo from their investment.
Money spent on blackmail does not at all unfairly prevent other competing candidates from accessing media at reasonable prices.
So there is absolutely NO legal justification for attempting to interfere with a candidates right to privacy, by paying blackmail.
And the Citizen's United ruling has pretty much even made foreign campaign contributions legal now, as long as they are funneled through a multi national corporation with US investments.
Again, attempting to make blackmail illegal is a crime by being complicit with blackmailer, after the fact.
The John Edwards case shows how corrupt and stupid it is to attempt to criminalize paying campaign blackmail, because obviously Edwards was freed on a hung jury that was intent on jury nullification. No rational juror would ever convict anyone for paying campaign blackmail.
Making up more shit, are ya? If it's of value to the campaign, it can be a campaign contribution. And silencing a porn star a week before the election about an affair is certainly of value to the campaign. $130,000 worth of value. And of course, Cohen plead guilty to the crime.
No its not.
Something of value is NOT possible to regulate by law.
For example, a PAC can run commercials for you, which help the campaign, and are of value to the campaign, but they do NOT have to be declared, disclosed, or stay within the individual contribution limits.
There is absolutely no way any legislation attempting to prevent people from doing this to aid a campaign could ever be legal.
All you can do is to make sure there is full disclosure of funds that can be used to monopolize media.
A candidate has a right to be free of blackmail and their sexual privacy being violated.
So the blackmail pay off does NOT advance the campaign, but merely puts it back to where it is supposed to be, by law.
Again, Edwards was not convicted, even though he did exactly the same thing, and there was absolutely no doubt he did it.
Sure Cohen plead guilty, but that is because he is stupid and does not understand law.
Apparently you do not understand law either.
Sounds like you are a lawyer?
It does not matter what PACs pay for. There is nothing at all illegal about paying blackmail, and there is nothing criminal about trying to prevent blackmail from succeeding. Something is only criminal when it harms someone. Who was harmed?
Cohen is a fool for pleading guilty when he would never have been convicted by any jury on the planet.
Second of all it had nothing to do with the campaign......
Try again.....you'll get him next time!