No 'Stand Down' Order In Benghazi, Despite What Darrell Issa Said

There was no order to 'stand down.'

There is no 'conspiracy' as there is nothing to 'cover up.'

And the 'investigation' is nothing more than a failed, partisan witch hunt by the right.

Nope.

Just the order Stay in place.


Do it hurt much? You know, when your asshole Republican politicians make a big boo boo like Issa has. Do it hurt much?

Do you EVER mind that your heroes (Republican politicians) lie to you so much? Just curious.

It seems to be verified since no military help was dispatched to Benghazi during the attack. The bottom line is we should have closed down the consulate since the Brits and the Red Cross had the common sense to get out.
 
And it is said there was no live streaming action video, where the President and top military aides sat around watching Americans being killed,

Imagine that?

So does Dante think that during the hours after the consulate was requesting help before they died anyone told him what was going on? Or does Dante think he was clueless, uninformed and out of the loop?



Of course he knew what was going on. He just didn't care. He went to bed. After all he had his Vegas fundraiser that he had to jet off to early the next morning.

Yup. He had his priorities in order and Benghazi and the deaths of one of his ambassadors and three other very good men weren't anywhere near as important as that fundraiser.

That should show everyone with a working brain cell just what kind of a man the POTUS is. An impressive specimen of duty and honor he ain't.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
There was no order to 'stand down.'

There is no 'conspiracy' as there is nothing to 'cover up.'

And the 'investigation' is nothing more than a failed, partisan witch hunt by the right.

Nope.

Just the order Stay in place.


Do it hurt much? You know, when your asshole Republican politicians make a big boo boo like Issa has. Do it hurt much?

Do you EVER mind that your heroes (Republican politicians) lie to you so much? Just curious.
No, they don't.

Reason being is that they WANT to be lied to.

You see, these rabid far RW whackos have a pre-conceived position, that started in November of 2008 that Obama must fail, so everything he does has to be scandal, no matter how big, small or insignificant it may be.

What these far RW whackos want is cover to push their lie. Cover that the likes of the scuzzy and sleazy Issa provides in SPADES.

You will note that all the bogus scandals are still called scandals by the rabid far RW even AFTER they have been PROVEN to be BOGUS. They just move on to the next bogus scandal and add it to their on-going "scandal" list.

That's the M.O. of every. single. far RW. nutjob of USMB and everywhere you see them in the media.
 
And it is said there was no live streaming action video, where the President and top military aides sat around watching Americans being killed,

Imagine that?

So does Dante think that during the hours after the consulate was requesting help before they died anyone told him what was going on? Or does Dante think he was clueless, uninformed and out of the loop?

Of course he knew what was going on. He just didn't care...

...
:eek: and also :cuckoo:

anyone who speaks like this about any President shouldn't be taken seriously
 
There was no order to 'stand down.'

There is no 'conspiracy' as there is nothing to 'cover up.'

And the 'investigation' is nothing more than a failed, partisan witch hunt by the right.

Nope.

Just the order Stay in place.

As widely reported, the order to "stay in place" was to protect some three dozen embassy personnel in Tripoli rather than fly to Benghazi some 600 miles away.
 
So does Dante think that during the hours after the consulate was requesting help before they died anyone told him what was going on? Or does Dante think he was clueless, uninformed and out of the loop?

Of course he knew what was going on. He just didn't care...

...
:eek: and also :cuckoo:

anyone who speaks like this about any President shouldn't be taken seriously

For real, it's not like we're talking about "W."

LOL, Dante's farts smell just like everyone else's...
 
This ready, fire, aim approach to attacking this administration is only helping this POTUS avoid the REAL questions.

When you are hell bent on attacking EVERY LAST THING, it is inevitable that many of your attacks are going to be found baseless and ill-informed. So this administration can deflect the real questions about the real short-comings by pointing to all these stupid attacks and say, "See ... they're just swinging blind."
 
There was no order to 'stand down.'

There is no 'conspiracy' as there is nothing to 'cover up.'

And the 'investigation' is nothing more than a failed, partisan witch hunt by the right.

Nope.

Just the order Stay in place.

As widely reported, the order to "stay in place" was to protect some three dozen embassy personnel in Tripoli rather than fly to Benghazi some 600 miles away.

And the order to cover it up was to protect the careers of some three dozen people in white house some 6,000 miles away
 
This ready, fire, aim approach to attacking this administration is only helping this POTUS avoid the REAL questions.

When you are hell bent on attacking EVERY LAST THING, it is inevitable that many of your attacks are going to be found baseless and ill-informed. So this administration can deflect the real questions about the real short-comings by pointing to all these stupid attacks and say, "See ... they're just swinging blind."

Do you say the same about Nixon? Covering ups are OK for the POTUS if he wasn't involved in the underlying act?
 
This ready, fire, aim approach to attacking this administration is only helping this POTUS avoid the REAL questions.

When you are hell bent on attacking EVERY LAST THING, it is inevitable that many of your attacks are going to be found baseless and ill-informed. So this administration can deflect the real questions about the real short-comings by pointing to all these stupid attacks and say, "See ... they're just swinging blind."

Do you say the same about Nixon? Covering ups are OK for the POTUS if he wasn't involved in the underlying act?

When did I say "cover-ups are OK"?

Please quote me.
 
And it is said there was no live streaming action video, where the President and top military aides sat around watching Americans being killed,

Imagine that?

So does Dante think that during the hours after the consulate was requesting help before they died anyone told him what was going on? Or does Dante think he was clueless, uninformed and out of the loop?



Of course he knew what was going on. He just didn't care. He went to bed. After all he had his Vegas fundraiser that he had to jet off to early the next morning.

Yup. He had his priorities in order and Benghazi and the deaths of one of his ambassadors and three other very good men weren't anywhere near as important as that fundraiser.

That should show everyone with a working brain cell just what kind of a man the POTUS is. An impressive specimen of duty and honor he ain't.

Since he gave the infamous Rose Garden speech (where he characterized the attack as an act terror) at about 10:45 CST, he must not have been jetting off too early now was he?

Remarks by the President on the Deaths of U.S. Embassy Staff in Libya | The White House

But don't let that get in the way of a perfectly good hate rant.........what does it matter to you that it's never been true.
 
Once again, for the mentally impaired:

As widely reported, the order to "stay in place" was to protect some three dozen embassy personnel in Tripoli rather than fly to Benghazi some 600 miles away. It was a military decision made by military commanders.
 
So does Dante think that during the hours after the consulate was requesting help before they died anyone told him what was going on? Or does Dante think he was clueless, uninformed and out of the loop?



Of course he knew what was going on. He just didn't care. He went to bed. After all he had his Vegas fundraiser that he had to jet off to early the next morning.

Yup. He had his priorities in order and Benghazi and the deaths of one of his ambassadors and three other very good men weren't anywhere near as important as that fundraiser.

That should show everyone with a working brain cell just what kind of a man the POTUS is. An impressive specimen of duty and honor he ain't.

Since he gave the infamous Rose Garden speech (where he characterized the attack as an act terror) at about 10:45 CST, he must not have been jetting off too early now was he?

Remarks by the President on the Deaths of U.S. Embassy Staff in Libya | The White House

But don't let that get in the way of a perfectly good hate rant.........what does it matter to you that it's never been true.

He still jetted off the next day though didn't he?? You bet your ass he did.

Hate? Hating someone takes a lot of emotion and quite frankly that POS ain't worth the bother.

Of course anyone who doesn't agree with the POS is seen as racist or a hater. My how well you make that observation come true.
 
Last edited:
This ready, fire, aim approach to attacking this administration is only helping this POTUS avoid the REAL questions.

When you are hell bent on attacking EVERY LAST THING, it is inevitable that many of your attacks are going to be found baseless and ill-informed. So this administration can deflect the real questions about the real short-comings by pointing to all these stupid attacks and say, "See ... they're just swinging blind."

Do you say the same about Nixon? Covering ups are OK for the POTUS if he wasn't involved in the underlying act?

When did I say "cover-ups are OK"?

Please quote me.

There you go. No one is accusing Obama of being involved in the failure to send troops to help the mission, the point is his abuse of the power of his office to impede finding out what happened. That is the real issue, and it's what's being attacked. He created a problem where none needed exist, I don't see any criminal behavior in the act itself, just politically motivated poor judgement. However, the cover up is an issue.
 
Last edited:
Do you say the same about Nixon? Covering ups are OK for the POTUS if he wasn't involved in the underlying act?

When did I say "cover-ups are OK"?

Please quote me.

There you go

In what translation does this equate to "Cover ups are OK"?

Correct me if I'm wrong - but this thread is about the "stand down" order that never happened. And that was the foundation of my post.

So you wanna try again?
 

Forum List

Back
Top