NOAA USHCN temperature data adjustments completely justified

[Crick]

Still waiting for some actual evidence that anyone has adjusted temperature data solely with the purpose of making the past look colder or the present look warmer and not because it makes the data more accurate.

And the direction the adjustment might go in doesn't prove anything one way or the other.

 

[SSDD]

That same comment could be said about any branch of science, many of which involve much more expensive research than climate work. Surely you must believe that the LHC was put together just as a money-making scheme by all those physicists involved. Yes? Way, way more expensive than collecting weather station data over the internet and chugging away on your PC for a few days.

Your answer lies in the amount of political interest taken in the LHC...how much public policy depends on testing at the LHC? Is there a special UN political division trying to dictate world policy based on findings at the LHC project?

The answers are there for anyone who isn't a brain dead dolt...sorry you can't see them.

 

[SSDD]

Still waiting for some actual evidence that anyone has adjusted temperature data solely with the purpose of making the past look colder or the present look warmer and not because it makes the data more accurate.

And the direction the adjustment might go in doesn't prove anything one way or the other.

Still waiting for a rational explanation for altering temperatures from 40, 50, 60, even 100 years ago...what other reason could there be but to make the present look warmer...they certainly didn't improve the accuracy of those measurements.

 

[Crick]

Prove to us (and I do mean prove) that accuracy was not increased by those adjustments.