Vanquish
Vanquisher of shills
- Aug 14, 2009
- 2,663
- 358
- 98
Yeah yeah yeah....You obviously have a different view of what Central Planning is other than the true definition. Central planning is where government maintains total control of economy, movement of the people in and out of country as well as inside country. Controls all industry all banking all communication and media. central planning is a virtual totalitarian regime. Venezuela's government is an example of Central Planning.Really? How would you label a person who believes big government/central planning, ownership of wealth, high taxes, socialized medicine, deficit spending with no earthly way to repay debt, no respect or interest in the private sector, high energy costs, larger and more social spending programs, etc?.....Obama is all of these things. Yes, perfect examples of a freedom and liberty loving patriotic American.
Please. Obama is a fucking Bolshevik. It is his desire to see as many people dependent on government as possible.
Now,,try asking a legitimate question ....or fuck off. I have no time for bullshit childish games.
Then why is every one of your whackjob posts full of insane shit that you can't backup?
1. Every government in the world involves central planning. Find one (in the top 100 countries that is) that doesn't and I'll buy you a lollipop. You can't. But you won't admit it.
2. Not only that, but our country has ALWAYS placed restrictions on imports and exports since the beginning of the whole country. Denying that would make you look idiotic.
3. Obama has NEVER supported taking away private property or forced work on anyone.
4. Obama has NEVER attempted to take over the means of production of the GDP. Even the auto bailout that involved the US government merely had the government in an INVESTMENT role. Not day to day operations. Today we don't own the car company either.
Fucking get a life you worthless pile of excrement. You don't know the meaning of socialist (as proven by your supposed examples) and you should have all access to the internet revoked...as it's making you even MORE stupid.
I never stated our government has no restrictions/rules on import and export. If you can find where I stated or implied that, you can have the lollipop you owe me,back.
BTW..NEVER start a sentence with "not only that"....That phrase is used in continuance of an idea. Please.
I never stated Obama was going to take away property or force work on anyone. Again. You are making up things as you go along.
Obama is not a proponent or a friend to the private sector. He believes the answers to poor economy and other factors is larger government and more government employment. He is a proponent of bureaucracy. He thinks job creation's highest and best use is in the public sector. That's a fact. You need only look to see where most of the stimulus money went.
It is well documented that the GM and Chrysler bailouts were payback to the UAW for their support in the 2008 election.
Fact, Chrysler is no longer technically an American company. It is owned at least in part by Fiat of Italy.
GM ended up declaring bankruptcy anyway and now the UAW owns the company. The reason why John and Jane Q Taxpayer are no longer owners of GM is because GM has never been and never will be obligated to pay back the bailout money.
As far as I am concerned none of these companies including Goldman Sachs and the other investment firms should have been able to declare bankruptcy, restructure and start anew.
But no....The politicians saw their gravy train of DNC and RNC money going down the dark path and no way could they have that.
Now as far as your parting shot....Why? Becaube I have the nerve to have a differing opinion than you?
Are my set of facts less worthy because they do not tow the Liberal line?
This is typical of you libs. You are intolerant to the core.
I am taking the high road and not return the insult.
I could rip you a new asshole, but I reserve my best stuff for worthy opponents. You are easy. Have a nice day. Done.
Yeah. You are done. I sat your ass down on a spike in my post above.
Here's the funniest part of your post...not that you'll "get the joke":
You scream intolerance of others while being intolerant. Making a sweeping, unsubstantiated mischaracterization of a large group of people.This is typical of you libs. You are intolerant to the core.
Not only that, but you can't fucking read. I'm not a liberal. Your continuous attempts to keep painting me as one make you look like you haven't passed 1st grade reading comprehension.
Yeah, I used "not only that" because the continual point I'm making is that you're a complete fucking moron/partisan shill who is insulated from reality. You're the type of person that spews his load all over the pages of USMB, anesthetized by their own self-importance. You're in this stupor of "libs r so evul. I must protekt the kuntree with my posts" that you dont try to have a real conversation with people.
Here's a tip...I can tell that you're a real shill because you're a bad listener AND you won't try to reach common ground in a conversation. No you won't be giving up your values if you try to understand someone with an opposing viewpoint...or find a basis for agreement with one.
Oh wait. I'm sure you'll call being reasonable some hippie liberal bullshit.