North Carolina approves amendment banning gay marriage

I have found about half of the so-called libertarians who frequent this board are just...

liberals.
 
Apologies - I misunderstood you earlier.

So - obviously everyone has rights. But what are the rights, exactly, that you are talking about with regards to children and their parents, as it relates to this conversation about same-sex couples?

The same rights that they have in any marriage. I don't really know what they are, not being a family law specialist.

What point are you trying to make Windbag? That's what I'm trying to get at....


.

Just wanted you to be aware that it is not simply a matter of two consenting adults making choices that do not affect anyone else. Children have actually suffered bullying and physical assault because they were in a family with gay parents. People might like to pretend the world is perfect, but it isn't, and any discussion of marriage involves more than the two people involved. This is especially true if we are talking about state sanctioned legal benefits that accrue from a recognized marriage. It imposes a burden on people who choose not to get married if we expand the tax benefits of marriage to more people than were able to grab it before, it can impose financial obligations on others if one. or more, of the people involved are members of the military or otherwise employed in the public service sector.

We should simply eliminate all state involvement in marriage, and end all the debate about the subject.
 
More importantly, why do you care if they get married or not.

Yeah, well, if you knew anything you'd know I am not American. I spell neighbour the way it is supposed to be spelt - you know, how the English spell it, the people who invented the language...:eusa_whistle:

Are you the guy that referred to himself as Sicilian recently? So are you an Italian, Italian-American, or just an American??

I don't care - all I want to see is a distinguishment between marriage and civil unions...

As a libertarian I could really care less who fucks who and who marries who.

As a Catholic I find "gay marriage" to be wrong - however, what others do is their own business...

Unlike many I'm able to separate my politics from my religion (or personal belief structure).

If you are a libertarian and care less who marries who, then why do propose that same-sex couples seek a "civil union", and opposite-sex couples seek a "marriage" under state law?

Why not just call them both the same thing - "marriage" (under state law)?

.

As I libertarian I don't believe the government (state or federal) should recognize marriage, however I'm not delusional and realize that unfortunately we have government (both state and federal) breathing down our necks...

But at the same time I'm not an anarchist - I believe in the Bill of Rights and the Tenth Amendment....

I'm not an anarchist.... I just believe that communities should be able to govern themselves in-connection with and under the Bill of Rights...

I don't believe we need 17 extra amendments that end with "unless Congress shall make/pass no law."
 
We're talking about strictly the public sector here, and how they should recognize same-sex marriage in the same way they do opposite-sex.
Consider also the simple fact that excluding a class of persons from accessing a state’s marriage law is offensive to our Constitution and the fundamental principles of the American Nation:

It is not within our constitutional tradition to enact laws of this sort. Central both to the idea of the rule of law and to our own Constitution's guarantee of equal protection is the principle that government and each of its parts remain open on impartial terms to all who seek its assistance.

Respect for this principle explains why laws singling out a certain class of citizens for disfavored legal status or general hardships are rare. A law declaring that in general it shall be more difficult for one group of citizens than for all others to seek aid from the government is itself a denial of equal protection of the laws in the most literal sense.

Romer, Governor of Colorado, et al. v. Evans et al., 517 U.S. 620 (1996).

Sexual preference is not a class.
 
I have found about half of the so-called libertarians who frequent this board are just...

liberals.

Classical Liberal, Democratic-Republican....

Sure there are some that claim to be "libertarian" but they are certainly anarchists who ironically support the idea of a larger government...

I'm a libertarian as-in Tea Party, Classical Liberal, Democratic-Republican... Thomas Jefferson.

The Bill of Rights (and numerous other documents authored by our founders) is pretty much my social bible, I'm a Christian (Catholic) as well tho, so obviously I carry those morals/ethics with me....
 
What is debating intelligence?

Is that like CIA stuff?

Well, anyone who implies another is an idiot while they fail to use 1st grade grammar properly themselves should be scolded.....

Are you really unaware of the fact that you are the stupidest person on this entire forum?

You are aware that "stupidest" is hardly a real word??

Can you write "firstest?"

You "aint" right dude....
 
Are you really unaware of the fact that you are the stupidest person on this entire forum?

You are aware that "stupidest" is hardly a real word??....



Yes it is, moron.

The only possible way you could use such a fucked up word - would have you insinuate that everyone who posts here is stupid (including yourself) and I'm the "stupidest" of all...

Even then it is "iffy."

Either way you're one stupid motherfucker.
 
I'm a Christian (Catholic) as well tho, so obviously I carry those morals/ethics with me....


Oh yeah, you've really demonstrated your 'morality' here time and time again... :rolleyes:

In what universe does the Bible say I have to be nice to condescending assholes???

Listen here you little shit - Nowhere in the Bible does it say I have to be nice to dickhead ignorant fucks and agree with every political position they take...............

As a matter of fact I'm getting pretty tired of you bastards using the Bible against individuals to promote your tyrannical bullshit nonsense...

The idea that I need to be passive because I'm a Catholic is one of the dumbest fucking ideas I have ever heard....

How the fuck you think Jesus managed to find himself on the cross dumbass??? by being passive ignorant one???
 
You are aware that "stupidest" is hardly a real word??....



Yes it is, moron.

The only possible way you could use such a fucked up word - would have you insinuate that everyone who posts here is stupid (including yourself) and I'm the "stupidest" of all...

Even then it is "iffy."

Either way you're one stupid motherfucker.


It is a standard superlative form of the adjective that applies to you. Take my word for it, idiot.
 
I'm a Christian (Catholic) as well tho, so obviously I carry those morals/ethics with me....


Oh yeah, you've really demonstrated your 'morality' here time and time again... :rolleyes:

In what universe does the Bible say I have to be nice to condescending assholes???

Listen here you little shit - Nowhere in the Bible does it say I have to be nice to dickhead ignorant fucks and agree with every political position they take...............

As a matter of fact I'm getting pretty tired of you bastards using the Bible against individuals to promote your tyrannical bullshit nonsense...

The idea that I need to be passive because I'm a Catholic is one of the dumbest fucking ideas I have ever heard....

How the fuck you think Jesus managed to find himself on the cross dumbass??? by being passive ignorant one???



Trying some clusmy distraction, idiot? Maybe build a little straw man? You fail again.

Aren't you the same dirtbag who had a good laugh about victims of rape and the oppression of millions? Aren't you the same greasy low-life who cried and cried about not finding a 'nice girl' who shared your 'values' about two seconds after boasting about using slutty women for meaningless sex? Yes, you are that same POS, you fucking hypocrite.

You're not fooling anyone, idiot.
 
orth Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment on Tuesday defining marriage solely as a union between a man and a woman, making it the 30th state to adopt such a ban.
With 35 percent of precincts reporting Tuesday, unofficial returns showed the amendment passing with about 58 percent of the vote to 42 percent against.
In the final days before the vote, members of President Barack Obama's cabinet expressed support for gay marriage and former President Bill Clinton recorded phone messages urging voters to reject the amendment. Opponents also held marches, ran TV ads and gave speeches, including one by Jay Bakker, son of televangelists Jim Bakker and the late Tammy Faye Bakker.


Read more: North Carolina approves amendment banning gay marriage | Fox News










Is evolver in chief too late?

YEAH--I guess we can color N. Carolina red for 2012. The President just endorsed same sex marriage.
 
Yes it is, moron.

The only possible way you could use such a fucked up word - would have you insinuate that everyone who posts here is stupid (including yourself) and I'm the "stupidest" of all...

Even then it is "iffy."

Either way you're one stupid motherfucker.


It is a standard superlative form of the adjective that applies to you. Take my word for it, idiot.

Oh, in short you're saying you used a word in the wrong context, but are being vague about it...

:lol:

I don't even know why I bother to post to you...

You do realize you're on my "ignore list?"
 
I knew a gay couple in New York that adopted an HIV positive child when no one else would.

These people were much more Christ like than any bigoted Southern Babtist.
 
Oh yeah, you've really demonstrated your 'morality' here time and time again... :rolleyes:

In what universe does the Bible say I have to be nice to condescending assholes???

Listen here you little shit - Nowhere in the Bible does it say I have to be nice to dickhead ignorant fucks and agree with every political position they take...............

As a matter of fact I'm getting pretty tired of you bastards using the Bible against individuals to promote your tyrannical bullshit nonsense...

The idea that I need to be passive because I'm a Catholic is one of the dumbest fucking ideas I have ever heard....

How the fuck you think Jesus managed to find himself on the cross dumbass??? by being passive ignorant one???



Trying some clusmy distraction, idiot? Maybe build a little straw man? You fail again.

Aren't you the same dirtbag who had a good laugh about victims of rape and the oppression of millions? Aren't you the same greasy low-life who cried and cried about not finding a 'nice girl' who shared your 'values' about two seconds after boasting about using slutty women for meaningless sex? Yes, you are that same POS, you fucking hypocrite.

You're not fooling anyone, idiot.

Aren't you the little Hitler that wants to steal money from every individual and allocate it??

Oh yea your are...

Tyrant fuck...
 
I knew a gay couple in New York that adopted an HIV positive child when no one else would.

These people were much more Christ like than any bigoted Southern Babtist.


It doesn't really matter what you think. If you can't get liberal California to go along with same sex marriage--there's no place that's going to do it. Obama just started a war--he's not going to win. I think he just committed political suicide--by endorsing same sex marriage. In fact, he just gave Mitt Romney the most unexpected--best gift of his lifetime.
 
I knew a gay couple in New York that adopted an HIV positive child when no one else would.

These people were much more Christ like than any bigoted Southern Babtist.

Go cry to your fucking president because that is exactly what he claims to be.
 

Forum List

Back
Top