'Nothing Illegal In Trump-Zelensky Call': NSC Official Tells Impeachment Inquiry

[konradv]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

Not even the Ukrainian NSC guy says that there was nothing illegal in the phone call. He just didn't like what Trump said.

Perhaps that's your interpretation, but I prefer to believe what an AMERICAN hero has to say.

You mean General Flynn?

You mean Federal Prisoner #XXXXXXXX?

 

[konradv]

 

[Claudette]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

I'll be right there beside you LMFAO. These lefty loons have tried everything and are still batting 0.

You can't cure fucking stupid.

 

[Faun]

I believe this guy 100%.

'Nothing Illegal In Trump-Zelensky Call': NSC Official Tells Impeachment Inquiry

Did your article quote Morrison saying:

"Dr. Hill told me that Ambassador Sondland and President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, were trying to get President Zelensky to reopen Ukrainian investigations into Burisma."​

What law did that break?

I already told you, fucking moron. It's not my problem you're too big of a fucking moron to retain information for more than 30 seconds.

 

[depotoo]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

Selective hearing. He was hot the only one. Several said the same. You just hear the loudest voices out there telling you when someone else says something you like.

No, that's what you're doing. Because there have not been several witnesses saying that what Trump did wasn't illegal.

You haven’t been checking all media then-
"Let's hear from some of the allegations of the whistleblower and why is that important? Because some of the things that the whistleblower has alleged in their complaint has been directly contradicted by not one, not two, but multiple witnesses behind closed doors," Meadows added. "So it's time that we allow the truth to come out. When we do, we will find that the president of the United States did not ... commit any impeachable offense."
Rep. Meadows: Dems' impeachment witnesses contradict quid pro quo narrative
Even Schiff admits it and tries to change the goal posts-
Adam Schiff insists there doesn't need to be proof of a 'quid pro quo' to impeach Donald Trump | Daily Mail Online

 

[Crepitus]

everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world?

Nobody told him that.

You homeschooled conservitards crack me up.

I'm sorry if my abstractions went too far over your head. Just as with Trump's dog meme that the media took seriously, I must continuously remind myself that I'm talking to tards. The ancient Greeks had estimated that the Earth was round. The real question in the 15th century was what was out there, how far could you go, could you get back, and what would you find? I think they actually believed they would sail into Asia.

THE POINT that escaped you my sizzle-brained friend is that one man (the few) proved the many wrong.

You went and looked it up, didn't you.

 

[bripat9643]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

Not even the Ukrainian NSC guy says that there was nothing illegal in the phone call. He just didn't like what Trump said.

Perhaps that's your interpretation, but I prefer to believe what an AMERICAN hero has to say.

You mean General Flynn?

You mean Federal Prisoner #XXXXXXXX?

Nope. It's more likely that the people who tried to frame him are going to prison.

 

[bripat9643]

I believe this guy 100%.

'Nothing Illegal In Trump-Zelensky Call': NSC Official Tells Impeachment Inquiry

Did your article quote Morrison saying:

"Dr. Hill told me that Ambassador Sondland and President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, were trying to get President Zelensky to reopen Ukrainian investigations into Burisma."​

What law did that break?

I already told you, fucking moron. It's not my problem you're too big of a fucking moron to retain information for more than 30 seconds.

That's your sleazy way of saying that you can't name the law he broke.

 

[OldLady]

Congress will determine what was illegal

Sure they will. Their main goal was to get rid of Trump, or at the very least, make him look bad. Now they are just trying to find a way to do it.

Our founders created a way to penalize a President that does wrongdoing, not have a penalty and look for ways to use it. But then again, who is more un-American than the Democrat party?

Trump has no understanding of right and wrong. The bottom line, winning, and price tags are all he knows.

 

[Faun]

I believe this guy 100%.

'Nothing Illegal In Trump-Zelensky Call': NSC Official Tells Impeachment Inquiry

Did your article quote Morrison saying:

"Dr. Hill told me that Ambassador Sondland and President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, were trying to get President Zelensky to reopen Ukrainian investigations into Burisma."​

What law did that break?

I already told you, fucking moron. It's not my problem you're too big of a fucking moron to retain information for more than 30 seconds.

That's your sleazy way of saying that you can't name the law he broke.

Wrong again, fucking moron. You already asked me that and I already showed you the law and even linked it to the statute.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Congress will determine what was illegal

Sure they will. Their main goal was to get rid of Trump, or at the very least, make him look bad. Now they are just trying to find a way to do it.

Our founders created a way to penalize a President that does wrongdoing, not have a penalty and look for ways to use it. But then again, who is more un-American than the Democrat party?

Trump has no understanding of right and wrong. The bottom line, winning, and price tags are all he knows.

And that's Trump's motto: winning. A cut above the rest that use their government position for personal or party gain, such as the Democrats are doing (and have been doing) today. As long as Trump is in charge, we are going to win so much we'll be tired of winning.

 

[toobfreak]

everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world?

Nobody told him that.

You homeschooled conservitards crack me up.

I'm sorry if my abstractions went too far over your head. Just as with Trump's dog meme that the media took seriously, I must continuously remind myself that I'm talking to tards. The ancient Greeks had estimated that the Earth was round. The real question in the 15th century was what was out there, how far could you go, could you get back, and what would you find? I think they actually believed they would sail into Asia.

THE POINT that escaped you my sizzle-brained friend is that one man (the few) proved the many wrong.

You went and looked it up, didn't you.

Yeah, you really walked into THAT one, didn't you? If you at all followed my posts closely outside of politics, you would have already known I almost became an astronomer and still teach it to this day, being one of the passions of my life. I could write a book about the history of archeoastronomy, the early astronomers from the Greeks, Ionians, the ancient Mexican civilizations. Their measurement of shadows at various places, their estimates of the curvature of the Earth, various other observations and extrapolations. Columbus was probably at least 1000 years past the last point where there were any doubts about the shape of the Earth, what they couldn't be sure of was the size, though one person came amazingly close.

But tell you what, any time you want to discuss astronomy, stellar physics, cosmology, stellar cartography and ancient mythology or evolution of mankind's perceptions and awareness of the Cosmos with me, go for it.

 

[iceberg]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process.

just thought i'd point that out too.

 

[The Original Tree]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

That's Vindman's BOSS Numb Nuts. Do you think his BOSS is going to stick his neck out like that when the DemTards voted to make some of The Fake Impeachment Public, and he is going to have to testify before The American People?

Also, the Fake Obama BJ Blower, is now outted as a CIA operative, working for Brennan, Biden and Obama and was involved with The Fake Russian Collusion Narrative.

This is not going to make it out of Congress.

 

[The Original Tree]

Congress will determine what was illegal

Actually The LAW US CODE, and LEGAL PRECEDENT WILL

How about you cite US Code The President Violated or are you too busy licking The Ayatollah's Assaholah?

 

[konradv]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process. just thought i'd point that out too.

I wouldn't take that tack considering you support those who were trying to impede due process...



...and then refusing to vote for the very transparency they were complaining about.

HYPOCRITES!!!

 

[konradv]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

That's Vindman's BOSS Numb Nuts. Do you think his BOSS is going to stick his neck out like that when the DemTards voted to make some of The Fake Impeachment Public, and he is going to have to testify before The American People?

Also, the Fake Obama BJ Blower, is now outted as a CIA operative, working for Brennan, Biden and Obama and was involved with The Fake Russian Collusion Narrative.

This is not going to make it out of Congress.

Fake news!

 

[WEATHER53]

Direct from the horses mouth or indirectly from the horses asses
We know which Dems will embrace

 

[toobfreak]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process. just thought i'd point that out too.

I wouldn't take that tack considering you support those who were trying to impede due process...

...and then refusing to vote for the very transparency they were complaining about.

HYPOCRITES!!!

TARD TRANSLATION:

• IMPEDING DUE PROCESS: not cooperating with the inquisitor who wants to put you in the gas chamber to shut you up.

• REFUSING TO VOTE FOR TRANSPARENCY: not willing to give legitimacy to and play along with a sham railroading sought after for four years.

 

[konradv]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process. just thought i'd point that out too.

I wouldn't take that tack considering you support those who were trying to impede due process...

...and then refusing to vote for the very transparency they were complaining about.

HYPOCRITES!!!

TARD TRANSLATION:

• IMPEDING DUE PROCESS: not cooperating with the inquisitor who wants to put you in the gas chamber to shut you up.

• REFUSING TO VOTE FOR TRANSPARENCY: not willing to give legitimacy to and play along with a sham railroading sought after for four years.

• Up the meds, your sycophancy is showing.