'NOTHING TO SEE HERE - MOVE ALONG!' Paterson, NJ, to hold new election in City Council race marred by voter fraud charges

Voter fraud really doesn’t happen here. It’s a right-wing talking point. It just doesn’t happen here. These are all the things I’ve heard about voter fraud peddled by Democrats and their allies in the media.


Well, in Paterson, New Jersey, it shows that a) voter fraud can happen here; and b) what the 2020 election could look like if this mail-in voting scheme pushed by Democrats over COVID is fully enacted. Folks, we’re heading for a train wreck. The US Postal Service warned at least 40 states that not all of their ballots could be counted in time for the 2020 election

Nice post, thank you.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: Taz
If both sides are cheating, doesn't that even things out? :dunno:
 
Wasn’t voter fraud.

It was votes illegally collected. NJ has strict limits on how many can be submitted
 
Wasn’t voter fraud.

It was votes illegally collected. NJ has strict limits on how many can be submitted
360
prevaricator-1.jpg
 
As a nation, this is our focus. The other side's corruption.
On this path the only way is down. A generation or two of this and there will be nothing left but poverty for all.

In which case, the left CLEARLY wins.
Trust me on this, I have many fine friends that identify themselves as "lefties."

They will not think of themselves as, "winning," but of only as of having been fooled again, just as the right has been, time and time again.

. . . and that, is the problem. YOU identify them as the problem, and THEY identify the right as the problem. When in reality? The folks that own and control all of it, CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, NYT, WallStreet Journal, etc. All of it?

They want you focused on the other side, so they can continue you their plans with out a unite populace, right for themselves.

 
In New Jersey, voters can designate someone to submit ballots on their behalf, but no one is allowed to drop off more than three during an election. As a result, an additional 1,000 votes were disqualified because a section on the ballot to list the name of the person sending them in had been left blank.

Only three ballots were thrown out because they had been cast in the names of people who were dead, and another was rejected because of suspicions that someone might have attempted to vote twice.

Voting experts say seizing on a relatively small case involving a handful of people to tar efforts to make voting easier has become a tactic to disenfranchise voters.
 
Wasn’t voter fraud.

It was votes illegally collected. NJ has strict limits on how many can be submitted
360
prevaricator-1.jpg

Read about the case

It was not illegal voters or fraudulent votes, it was how the mail in votes were collected
You don't need to explain to a Political Scientist how ballot harvesting works bucko.

I'm well aware of how the newest and greatest way to steal elections is.

Did you help out with Brenda Snips in Dade County? Were you proud of that effort? :talktothehand:

 
In New Jersey, voters can designate someone to submit ballots on their behalf, but no one is allowed to drop off more than three during an election. As a result, an additional 1,000 votes were disqualified because a section on the ballot to list the name of the person sending them in had been left blank.

Only three ballots were thrown out because they had been cast in the names of people who were dead, and another was rejected because of suspicions that someone might have attempted to vote twice.

Voting experts say seizing on a relatively small case involving a handful of people to tar efforts to make voting easier has become a tactic to disenfranchise voters.
Since the court invalidated the entire election, EVERY vote was disqualified due to rampant fraud and abuse.
 
Last edited:
Rick Hasen, an election law professor at the University of California, Irvine, School of Law, said the problems in Paterson illustrate the challenges of mass rollouts of mail-in voting and the need for anti-fraud mechanisms like ballot tracking, which allows voters to follow their ballots through the postal system.

But, he added, the case also shows large-scale voting fraud would be difficult to successfully carry out.
Bingo. Much ado over nothing to suppress the vote. Problem is the States allow private interests to get involved when trying to ramp up mail in registration. A recipe for overloading the system. They send out multiple applications over time, so when the voter gets no timely feedback they naturally keep trying which just gums everything up all the more. By the time that gets resolved there's little to no time left to vote and count. It sure ain't the fault of the Postal Service. It's all guided by political shenanigans perpetrated at the State level.
 
Last edited:
Poster Nostra is illiterate. Four persons have been charged with abuse of a lawful New Jersey local practice--bearing up to three ballots to the polls, on behalf of others. It is controlled. The controls were violated. The matter is now widespread public information. The pleas tend to "Not Guilty" in the unique--not mass corruption--cases.

The election was overturned since an usual number of ballots had to be disqualified.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Easily casting one third of USA voting--out of National Consideration: Matt 25: 14-30!)
 
Poster Nostra is illiterate. Four persons have been charged with abuse of a lawful New Jersey local practice--bearing up to three ballots to the polls, on behalf of others. It is controlled. The controls were violated. The matter is now widespread public information. The pleas tend to "Not Guilty" in the unique--not mass corruption--cases.

The election was overturned since an usual number of ballots had to be disqualified.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Easily casting one third of USA voting--out of National Consideration: Matt 25: 14-30!)
Your moronic spin isn't gonna work.

The entire election was thrown out because of rampant voter fraud.
 
Per Illiterate Nostra Poster, in advanced Dementia, on the widespread problem: Then why were two charged with VOTER FRAUD? (Alleging the 2nd Coming?)

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Easily casting one third of USA voting--out of National Consideration: Matt 25: 14-30!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top