Notice how the democrats always compare conservatives to Nazis?

[Political Junky]

Yet, ever since this murderous scum democrat tried to kill members of congress yesterday, hardly a post goes by without the democrats here accusing conservatives of wanting the murder politicians, which is the EXACT tactic the Germans used in WW2. democrats playing their little games, trying their very best to start a war and blame the other side, just like the the Nazis did.

View attachment 133284

You betcha.

Alt-right beliefs have been described as isolationist, protectionist, antisemitic, and white supremacist,[17][18][19] frequently overlapping with Neo-Nazism,[20][21][22] nativism and Islamophobia,[23][24][25][26][27] antifeminism and homophobia,[20][28][29][30] right-wing populism,[31][32] and the neoreactionary movement.[17][33] The concept has further been associated with multiple groups from American nationalists, neo-monarchists, men's rights advocates, and the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump.[23][32][33][34][35]

Alt-right - Wikipedia

 

[mamooth]

Oh, bullshit, Mike sometimes engages in hyperbole, but no Constitution loving American conservative has ever advocated rounding people up and putting them in camps or moving them by force to distant territories.

No True Scotsman fallacy. We'll point to the ones who to, and you'll claim they're not real conservatives.

Needless to say, no liberals are advocating such things. Just conservatives. The Nazism there is all on your side.

It is the Democrats who advocate 'strong authoritarian government', not American conservatives.

The fanatical worship of authoritarianism is now the defining trait of the American right.

It is the Democrats who want the laws to discriminate on the basis of race (against white people), not American conservatives.

White supremacism is definitely a Nazi trait. As is anti-semitism, which is rampant on the right here. And yet no conservative will criticize their anti-semite brethren. Quite the contrary, they all stand in solidarity with their anti-semite brethren. That is, most conservatives may not be open Nazis, but they all suck the asses of the open Nazis on their side.

It is the Democrats who want abortion on demand like the Nazis did, not American conservatives.

The Nazis forbade abortion for Aryan women. You think no woman should get a choice, so your position is identical to the Nazi position. As liberals think every woman should get a choice, our position is the exact opposite of the Nazi position.

It is the Democrats who want ecological issues to take priority over human interests, again like the Nazis did, not American conservatives.

What the are you babbling about? The Nazis were enviromentalists? In the tradition of Goebbels, your mentor, you're just making up propaganda.

So, we get it. You and many other conservatives here seek to emulate the Nazis in every way. Instead of showing the ways that you're like the Nazis, it would be a shorter list if you'd just show the ways you differ from Nazis.

 

[miketx]

^ no matter how hard he tries to point people away from dim crime, it fails. Every time.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Nazis also made up stories of the threat violent Jews/liberals to justify their own brownshit tactics. Miketx and Koshrgrl continue that proud tradition.

The funny thing is they think it's not obvious that they're using Hitler's playbook.

Those pictures and yesterday's shooting are all very examples of leftist violence.


Keep poking the bear motherfuckers, watch what happens.

 

[danielpalos]

Yet, ever since this murderous scum democrat tried to kill members of congress yesterday, hardly a post goes by without the democrats here accusing conservatives of wanting the murder politicians, which is the EXACT tactic the Germans used in WW2. democrats playing their little games, trying their very best to start a war and blame the other side, just like the the Nazis did.

View attachment 133284

The most ironic part is that the Nazis were leftists. I'm reminded of that every time they refer to the right as Nazis.

You'll probably discount this and that's fine, if you do it shows your ignorance of detailed history. When Hitler joined the party it was espousing national socialist ideology, by the time he came to power he had made alliances with the German industrialists and the military for his own reasons. After Hitler came to power Rohm and the rest of the SA leaders started demanding Hitler start instituting the national socialist changes which included nationalizing all of Germany's industry, in response Hitler ordered Operation Hummingbird better known as the Night of the Long Knives. Hitler's plan was to suppress worker's rights in favor of the industrialists to put the country on a war footing so he eliminated Rohm and hundreds of others that he saw as a threat to his plans and never instituted the national socialist reforms making the name National Socialist German Workers' Party (NAZI) meaningless. Hitler was a nationalist dictator, not a socialist by any stretch of the imagination, all accepted political definitions label Nationalist Dictatorships as far right constructs. As for the name Nazi, I can call myself a tree but it doesn't make me one..........
As for the left calling the right in this country Nazis, they're just as wrong except in a few obvious examples (Skinheads, etc) that even the vast majority of conservatives rightfully reject.
Those are the facts, accept them or not as you chose.

Those skinheads are called 14488ers.

During his reign, the government controlled all industry, all workers were employed by the government, and they had universal healthcare. Sure, people will tell you that the government didn't own industry, but the businesses only owned themselves in name, the government told them what to do and when to do it. Germany was every bit as Socialist as Russia.

They controlled it to a degree and yes they has some socialistic programs but that doesn't change the fact that it was a true nationalist dictatorship but then again we can argue semantics all day long and never get anywhere. Like I said believe whatever floats your boat........

People can believe whatever floats their boats, but beliefs don't dictate facts. The facts being that Germany's government controlled the means of production, which is Social ownership of production, which is Socialism. As a matter of fact, they remained Socialist through the entirety of Hitler's reign, and the only reason their economy 'worked' for the duration is because they imported the parts for a booming industry(Cars) so that they can manufacture and sell them. All of that said, yes, Germany was Socialist under Hitler, that is a fact. They had universal healthcare, the government controlled the means of production, and everyone was employed by the government. The Nazis supported and implemented this system, the Nazis were factually Socialist. Socialism is far left, the Nazis were Socialist, the Nazis were left wing.

All of that said, it makes perfect sense, as far right is total freedom through the shrinking of government, and the far left is total security through the expansion of government. The only people who can mistake the Nazis for right wing are those who never give it any thought themselves.

Left wing compared to the right; but right wing when compared to liberal socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

Liberals HATE trump so much because they are white-hating RACISTS

"Except the difference between now and then is that the people being rounded up will deserve it this time" -- Miketx

Mikey here is calling for liberals to be rounded up and put in camps, yet he can't understand why he's being compared to Nazis.

Mike, we'll make a deal. If you stop acting like a Nazi shitstain, we'll stop pointing it out. You too Statford. Being a Nazi asslicker is just like being a Nazi, except wimpier.

Needless to say, no liberals are calling for conservatives to be exterminated or put in camps. That kind of Nazi ratfukery is exclusive to conservatives. And while not all conservatives endorse it, not a single one will condemn it.

Ouch! Mikey just got pwned

Oh, bullshit, Mike sometimes engages in hyperbole, but no Constitution loving American conservative has ever advocated rounding people up and putting them in camps or moving them by force to distant territories.

That has ALWAYS been a Democrat thing.

End the drug war, right wingers.

 

[danielpalos]

Hitler and the Nazis were completely Totalitarian, anti-humanistic and this translated into their economic policies as 'Socialism' by their own assertion.

People in Europe categorized Hitler as a 'conservative' but by the European meaning of that word, not the American. In Europe where absolute monarchies were the norm prior to World war Two just about twenty short years before the Nazis took power, totalitarianism was a conservative approach to government, but it has never been accepted by American conservatism.

It is the Democrats who advocate 'strong authoritarian government', not American conservatives.

It is the Democrats who want the laws to discriminate on the basis of race (against white people), not American conservatives.

It is the Democrats who want abortion on demand like the Nazis did, not American conservatives.

It is the Democrats who want ecological issues to take priority over human interests, again like the Nazis did, not American conservatives.

It is the Democrats who want reduce capitalism to a mere show like the Nazis did, not American conservatives.

It is the Democrats who want to disarm the public like the Nazis, not American conservatives.

It is the Democrats who want control of education by a strong central government like the Nazis, not American conservatives.

It is the Democrats who want to suppress opposition free speech like the Nazis did, not American conservatives.

It is the Democrats who want to trample under religious rights to obey one's conscience like the Nazis again, not American conservatives.

Enough said about who is more Nazi like as it is clearly liberals.

end the drug war right wingers; y'all talk too much.

 

[Mac1958]

Sure, Democrats compare conservatives to Nazis (or whatever), conservatives compare Democrats to communists (or whatever).

Regular stuff.

Both ends are consumed by ideology and hyperbole (among other things), so they're not meant to be taken seriously.

Evidently this is all just a big game.
.

 

[Mr Natural]

Sure, Democrats compare conservatives to Nazis (or whatever), conservatives compare Democrats to communists (or whatever).

Regular stuff.

Both ends are consumed by ideology and hyperbole (among other things), so they're not meant to be taken seriously.

Evidently this is all just a big game.
.

Politics has become just another sporting event in America.

 

[Mac1958]

Sure, Democrats compare conservatives to Nazis (or whatever), conservatives compare Democrats to communists (or whatever). Regular stuff. Both ends are consumed by ideology and hyperbole (among other things), so they're not meant to be taken seriously. Evidently this is all just a big game..

Politics has become just another sporting event in America.

I think it more resembles Pro Wrestling.


.

 

[tigerred59]

If ever there was a party to compared to Nazi's, its Trump's GOP party...you mf's reeeeeeeeeeeekkkkkkkkkk of roasting Jews in your sleep.

 

[danielpalos]

I would like to notice, how the right wing is going to "own the drug war", after this right wing administration.

 

[danielpalos]

If ever there was a party to compared to Nazi's, its Trump's GOP party...you mf's reeeeeeeeeeeekkkkkkkkkk of roasting Jews in your sleep.

Honey nut?

 

[mamooth]

Some more recent conservative death-lust on display here.

More bullets fired on Trump supporters
---
We should hang all liberals, you reap what you sow, and that is hatred. -- jknowgood
---

Breaking: Senate passes sanctions against Russia for alleged election interference
---
Russia has shown extreme patience with the crazy democrats. They should just take out new York and say "game on" -- tipsycatlover
---

Needless to say, no liberals here are calling for the mass murder of US citizens.

And needless to say, no conservatives are criticizing the conservatives who do call for the mass murder of US citizens. Nor will they ever criticize it, because TheParty forbids one party member from ever criticizing another, unless it's to say they're not sufficiently loyal to TheParty.

 

[namvet]

if you dont know history you will repeat it.....

looks like the democrats are pretty far along on the remake. They have been following the nazi play book for years.

you're pardon please. they are now called the Islamic dems

 

[Ringel05]

Yet, ever since this murderous scum democrat tried to kill members of congress yesterday, hardly a post goes by without the democrats here accusing conservatives of wanting the murder politicians, which is the EXACT tactic the Germans used in WW2. democrats playing their little games, trying their very best to start a war and blame the other side, just like the the Nazis did.

View attachment 133284

The most ironic part is that the Nazis were leftists. I'm reminded of that every time they refer to the right as Nazis.

You'll probably discount this and that's fine, if you do it shows your ignorance of detailed history. When Hitler joined the party it was espousing national socialist ideology, by the time he came to power he had made alliances with the German industrialists and the military for his own reasons. After Hitler came to power Rohm and the rest of the SA leaders started demanding Hitler start instituting the national socialist changes which included nationalizing all of Germany's industry, in response Hitler ordered Operation Hummingbird better known as the Night of the Long Knives. Hitler's plan was to suppress worker's rights in favor of the industrialists to put the country on a war footing so he eliminated Rohm and hundreds of others that he saw as a threat to his plans and never instituted the national socialist reforms making the name National Socialist German Workers' Party (NAZI) meaningless. Hitler was a nationalist dictator, not a socialist by any stretch of the imagination, all accepted political definitions label Nationalist Dictatorships as far right constructs. As for the name Nazi, I can call myself a tree but it doesn't make me one..........
As for the left calling the right in this country Nazis, they're just as wrong except in a few obvious examples (Skinheads, etc) that even the vast majority of conservatives rightfully reject.
Those are the facts, accept them or not as you chose.

Those skinheads are called 14488ers.

During his reign, the government controlled all industry, all workers were employed by the government, and they had universal healthcare. Sure, people will tell you that the government didn't own industry, but the businesses only owned themselves in name, the government told them what to do and when to do it. Germany was every bit as Socialist as Russia.

Oh and use rational logic, not rationalized logic. Nazism under Hitler was never pure Nazism, the Soviet Union (especially under Stalin) was never a pure communist state and the US was never a pure democracy. There are no pure forms of sociopolitical constructs anywhere in the world.

Of course the Soviet Union was never Communist, Communism doesn't exist, and nobody has ever practiced it in the history of the world. For Communism to be practiced, there has to be no government, no currency, and no social classes. Calling the Soviet Union Communist was only a tactic by the Socialists to distance themselves from their massive failures, as the Soviet Union is a shining example of the failure of the Socialist ideology. Socialism requires Social control of the means of production whether it's controlled by the people or the government, which the Soviet Union had. It was a centrally planned economy, and everything was controlled by the government. They were PURE Socialism down to every core component required. The great experiment was perfect Socialism.

The US was never a pure Democracy because it was never a Democracy at all, we're a Republic.

Germany WAS pure Nazism as they implemented every policy needed to be Socialist, as described in my other response. Social control of the means of production, everyone was employed by the government, and universal healthcare. Socialist paradise not unlike the Soviet Union.

Like I said, we can agree to disagree because we're back to semantics again.

 

[Ringel05]

Hitler was a nationalist dictator, not a socialist by any stretch of the imagination,

There is nothing incompatible between nationalism and socialism.

Never said there was. Read, don't read into..........

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Pumpkin Row]

The most ironic part is that the Nazis were leftists. I'm reminded of that every time they refer to the right as Nazis.

You'll probably discount this and that's fine, if you do it shows your ignorance of detailed history. When Hitler joined the party it was espousing national socialist ideology, by the time he came to power he had made alliances with the German industrialists and the military for his own reasons. After Hitler came to power Rohm and the rest of the SA leaders started demanding Hitler start instituting the national socialist changes which included nationalizing all of Germany's industry, in response Hitler ordered Operation Hummingbird better known as the Night of the Long Knives. Hitler's plan was to suppress worker's rights in favor of the industrialists to put the country on a war footing so he eliminated Rohm and hundreds of others that he saw as a threat to his plans and never instituted the national socialist reforms making the name National Socialist German Workers' Party (NAZI) meaningless. Hitler was a nationalist dictator, not a socialist by any stretch of the imagination, all accepted political definitions label Nationalist Dictatorships as far right constructs. As for the name Nazi, I can call myself a tree but it doesn't make me one..........
As for the left calling the right in this country Nazis, they're just as wrong except in a few obvious examples (Skinheads, etc) that even the vast majority of conservatives rightfully reject.
Those are the facts, accept them or not as you chose.

Those skinheads are called 14488ers.

During his reign, the government controlled all industry, all workers were employed by the government, and they had universal healthcare. Sure, people will tell you that the government didn't own industry, but the businesses only owned themselves in name, the government told them what to do and when to do it. Germany was every bit as Socialist as Russia.

Oh and use rational logic, not rationalized logic. Nazism under Hitler was never pure Nazism, the Soviet Union (especially under Stalin) was never a pure communist state and the US was never a pure democracy. There are no pure forms of sociopolitical constructs anywhere in the world.

Of course the Soviet Union was never Communist, Communism doesn't exist, and nobody has ever practiced it in the history of the world. For Communism to be practiced, there has to be no government, no currency, and no social classes. Calling the Soviet Union Communist was only a tactic by the Socialists to distance themselves from their massive failures, as the Soviet Union is a shining example of the failure of the Socialist ideology. Socialism requires Social control of the means of production whether it's controlled by the people or the government, which the Soviet Union had. It was a centrally planned economy, and everything was controlled by the government. They were PURE Socialism down to every core component required. The great experiment was perfect Socialism.

The US was never a pure Democracy because it was never a Democracy at all, we're a Republic.

Germany WAS pure Nazism as they implemented every policy needed to be Socialist, as described in my other response. Social control of the means of production, everyone was employed by the government, and universal healthcare. Socialist paradise not unlike the Soviet Union.

Like I said, we can agree to disagree because we're back to semantics again.

You say "Semantics" as though the exact meaning and reasoning behind everything isn't incredibly important. One who doesn't concern themselves with being absolutely right will be absolutely wrong.

Agree to disagree? I've made a sound argument backed by history when you came here to correct me, you lost because you didn't understand the topic. I suppose you think this is the best way for you to back off without admitting you were wrong? I'm willing to bet that just like everyone else on this forum, the next time the argument pops up, you're going to say the exact same thing you opened with to the next person, and if they prove you wrong, you're going to close with the exact same statement.

That's the thing about facts, you can disagree with them all you like, but that doesn't prevent them from being facts.