now that the global warming theory is over...

Is that what those are? I thought that was the no impact man has on anything you guys keep talking about.

Maybe David Copperfield or Penn Jilette will show how satellites and space junk heat the deep oceans

Keep dancing Frank. You cant explain how humans have no impact on the earth so you do your little hula dance as a distraction.

The distraction is how you cannot point to a single lab experiment that shows a temperature increase from raising CO2 a few hundred ppm
 
Maybe David Copperfield or Penn Jilette will show how satellites and space junk heat the deep oceans

Keep dancing Frank. You cant explain how humans have no impact on the earth so you do your little hula dance as a distraction.

The distraction is how you cannot point to a single lab experiment that shows a temperature increase from raising CO2 a few hundred ppm

And you cant explain YOUR own logic. Its' yours and you cant explain it. Those "lab experiements" aren't mine so yes, it would be hard to explain and whats your excuse :lol:
 
Increase of the CO2 beyond the 400 ppm is not going impact anything much, since the plot of the dependency is not LINEAR.

In other words -it does not matteranymore :D
 
Hardly- it's never been hotter- now the oceans are catching up, according to scientists and 3000 buoys around the world. But, carry on Pub dupes- keep fighting for pollution and greedy idiot billionnaires.......

it's never been hotter-

LOL! Most of Earth's history has been much hotter.
 
Not since people have been around...

Last year was record hot in the Arctic, why growth in a cold year this year means nothing- AP. New thin ice is not thick old ice either. ANOTHER Pub canard, for dupes only...
 
Not since people have been around...

Last year was record hot in the Arctic, why growth in a cold year this year means nothing- AP. New thin ice is not thick old ice either. ANOTHER Pub canard, for dupes only...

Yo, frankie boy, algore needs his ass wiped, he is calling for you to come do your duty. :cuckoo:

AGW is a hoax, frankie. algore lied to you, east anglia lied to you.
 
warm-ers are going to release info tomorrow where they have to admit data doesn't show what they expect.
that, and the fact other planets in the solar system are showing similar patterns with their polar caps is proof this theory is dead.

it's time for us to learn the lesson about the government trying to grab power in the name of environmentalism, and start thinking about REAL pollution issues.


..



Michael Mann: Climate-Change Deniers Must Stop Distorting the Evidence (Op-Ed)

Only warmers get to distort the evidence. :lol:
 
Not since people have been around...

Last year was record hot in the Arctic, why growth in a cold year this year means nothing- AP. New thin ice is not thick old ice either. ANOTHER Pub canard, for dupes only...

Yo, frankie boy, algore needs his ass wiped, he is calling for you to come do your duty. :cuckoo:

AGW is a hoax, frankie. algore lied to you, east anglia lied to you.

If you make it about Al Gore and not about the thousands of scientist who agree I can see how you would be confused a bit
 
Not since people have been around...

Last year was record hot in the Arctic, why growth in a cold year this year means nothing- AP. New thin ice is not thick old ice either. ANOTHER Pub canard, for dupes only...

Yo, frankie boy, algore needs his ass wiped, he is calling for you to come do your duty. :cuckoo:

AGW is a hoax, frankie. algore lied to you, east anglia lied to you.

If you make it about Al Gore and not about the thousands of scientist who agree I can see how you would be confused a bit
What you don't understand is exactly how many scientists went along with that email who are now trying to save face by pretending the bs to get grants didn't really matter to make it seem like it doesn't matter.

It matters that science remains true to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

You have no idea how many times I've opened a thread with feces flying in the direction of conservatives over objecting in principle to the lies those notorious emails revealed about ZERO evidence supporting the warmers who have now changed their name to keep the onus off the little circle of omuerta fools who fell for perpetuating lies of omission. People who receive doctorate degrees today seem to be lacking in some much-needed training in ethics that honest people do not tolerate.

And you in particular seem to be carrying the torch for these hybrid dolts of the warming hoax who now prefer another label to make it about "climate change" being anthropogenic, of course. :evil:
 
Last edited:
Yo, frankie boy, algore needs his ass wiped, he is calling for you to come do your duty. :cuckoo:

AGW is a hoax, frankie. algore lied to you, east anglia lied to you.

If you make it about Al Gore and not about the thousands of scientist who agree I can see how you would be confused a bit
What you don't understand is exactly how many scientists went along with that email who are now trying to save face by pretending the bs to get grants didn't really matter to make it seem like it doesn't matter.

It matters that science remains true to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

You have no idea how many times I've opened a thread with feces flying in the direction of conservatives over objecting in principle to the lies those notorious emails revealed about ZERO evidence supporting the warmers who have now changed their name to keep the onus off the little circle of omuerta fools who fell for perpetuating lies of omission. People who receive doctorate degrees today seem to be lacking in some much-needed training in ethics that honest people do not tolerate.

And you in particular seem to be carrying the torch for these hybrid dolts of the warming hoax who now prefer another label to make it about "climate change" being anthropogenic, of course. :evil:

No matter how much you type it will never dismiss the thousands of scientists who agree with Global Warming. Thousands do and your response is a theory isn't 100% correct so therefore none of it is. Tell that to the thousands of scientists who say otherwise.
 
I'm still waiting for an answer about what the correct temperature the Earth should be. If it's too hot or too cold, there should be a proper temperature we're aiming for. So what is it?
 
I'm still waiting for an answer about what the correct temperature the Earth should be. If it's too hot or too cold, there should be a proper temperature we're aiming for. So what is it?

Whatever temperature that gives liberals the most control over our lives.
 
If you make it about Al Gore and not about the thousands of scientist who agree I can see how you would be confused a bit
What you don't understand is exactly how many scientists went along with that email who are now trying to save face by pretending the bs to get grants didn't really matter to make it seem like it doesn't matter.

It matters that science remains true to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

You have no idea how many times I've opened a thread with feces flying in the direction of conservatives over objecting in principle to the lies those notorious emails revealed about ZERO evidence supporting the warmers who have now changed their name to keep the onus off the little circle of omuerta fools who fell for perpetuating lies of omission. People who receive doctorate degrees today seem to be lacking in some much-needed training in ethics that honest people do not tolerate.

And you in particular seem to be carrying the torch for these hybrid dolts of the warming hoax who now prefer another label to make it about "climate change" being anthropogenic, of course. :evil:

No matter how much you type it will never dismiss the thousands of scientists who agree with Global Warming. Thousands do and your response is a theory isn't 100% correct so therefore none of it is. Tell that to the thousands of scientists who say otherwise.

If those "who agree with Global Warming" had the facts on their side, why do they need to lie and hide information?
 
What you don't understand is exactly how many scientists went along with that email who are now trying to save face by pretending the bs to get grants didn't really matter to make it seem like it doesn't matter.

It matters that science remains true to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

You have no idea how many times I've opened a thread with feces flying in the direction of conservatives over objecting in principle to the lies those notorious emails revealed about ZERO evidence supporting the warmers who have now changed their name to keep the onus off the little circle of omuerta fools who fell for perpetuating lies of omission. People who receive doctorate degrees today seem to be lacking in some much-needed training in ethics that honest people do not tolerate.

And you in particular seem to be carrying the torch for these hybrid dolts of the warming hoax who now prefer another label to make it about "climate change" being anthropogenic, of course. :evil:

No matter how much you type it will never dismiss the thousands of scientists who agree with Global Warming. Thousands do and your response is a theory isn't 100% correct so therefore none of it is. Tell that to the thousands of scientists who say otherwise.

If those "who agree with Global Warming" had the facts on their side, why do they need to lie and hide information?

Thousands of scientists agreed on the peer reviewed information on Global Warming. "not liking it" is not a scientific rebuttal.
 
No matter how much you type it will never dismiss the thousands of scientists who agree with Global Warming. Thousands do and your response is a theory isn't 100% correct so therefore none of it is. Tell that to the thousands of scientists who say otherwise.

If those "who agree with Global Warming" had the facts on their side, why do they need to lie and hide information?

Thousands of scientists agreed on the peer reviewed information on Global Warming. "not liking it" is not a scientific rebuttal.

If the facts are on their side, they shouldn't have to lie.
 
If those "who agree with Global Warming" had the facts on their side, why do they need to lie and hide information?

Thousands of scientists agreed on the peer reviewed information on Global Warming. "not liking it" is not a scientific rebuttal.

If the facts are on their side, they shouldn't have to lie.

They didn't its been peer reviewed by thousands of scientist individually.
 

Forum List

Back
Top