NY Post Story on Hunter Biden quickly unraveling.

[Beef_Supreme]

could sit here and point to all the evidence that no one hacked the DNC’s email, that they were in fact downloaded from within, but you don’t care.

You can’t point to any evidence that I can’t debunk now and have done so repeatedly in the past.

I know all about Bill Binney, VIPS and the supposed metadata showing transfer speeds that supposedly exceed bandwidth. It’s all extremely shoddy analysis and I can say why.

mhmm. Ok.
Why did the dnc refuse to let the fbi or anyone else examine the servers, instead hiring crowd strike?

 

[Beef_Supreme]

Just like Hillary’s emails, these hunter emails are legit.

Got it. Your faith in whatever the cult tells you is strong, so strong that reality can't shake it.

You should start searching for a compound in the desert where you can retreat with the other cultists to await the second coming of Trump.

My God you are witty.
I guess I’ll just leave now. with razor sharp wit like yours, what chance do any of us stand?

 

[Nostra]

it did worse than hurt the campaign,,,
it disrupted the first 3 yrs of his term and cost millions of dollars,, not to mention all the dems that had to go on meds cause they thought it was true,,,

The question was how it hurt his campaign, not how it hurt his first term.

So instead of answering my question, you answered a different one so I’ll ask again.

How did it hurt his campaign?

How did it hurt his campaign?

Drove him back to his bunker because he admits he has no response to this scandal.

 

[Flash]

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

That is different and you used the word, not I.

Take a step back. Do you agree that Biden is the favorite? Yes or no? As of today.

“That’s different”? No, it’s not. You do what you attack people for doing. It isn’t the first time either.

I’ve said repeatedly I don’t think Biden is the favorite. If you are still asking this question, you’re not reading what I’m writing. Doesn’t this fit your special definition of trolling?

Swing state averages
Arizona: Biden +3.8

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 49.3%, Trump 45.5%

Last week: Biden 48.5%, Trump 45.2% (Biden +3.3)

Net change: Biden +0.5

Florida: Biden +2.7

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 48.7%, Trump 46.0%

Last week: Biden 48.5%, Trump 44.5% (Biden +4.0)

Net change: Trump +1.3

Georgia: Biden +1.3

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 47.9%, Trump 46.6%

Last week: Biden 47.1%, Trump 46.9% (Biden +0.2)

Net change: Biden +1.1

Iowa: Biden +0.8

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 47.8%, Trump 47.0%

Last week: NA

Net change: NA

Michigan: Biden +7.5

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 50.4%, Trump 42.9%

Last week: Biden 50.5%, Trump 43.2% (Biden +7.3)

Net change: Biden +0.2

Minnesota: Biden +7.8

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 49.0%, Trump 41.2%

Last week: Biden 50.4%, Trump 41.1% (Biden +9.3)

Net change: Trump +1.5

Nevada: Biden +5.9

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 49.3%, Trump 43.4%

Last week: Biden 50.2%, Trump 43.8% (Biden +6.4)

Net change: Trump +0.5

North Carolina: Biden +2.9

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 48.8%, Trump 45.9%

Last week: Biden 48.7%, Trump 46.5% (Biden +2.2)

Net change: Biden +0.7

Ohio: Trump +0.3

USA TODAY average of averages: Trump 46.7%, Biden 46.4%

Last week: Biden 47.0%, Trump 46.3% (Biden +0.7)

Net change: Trump +1.0

Pennsylvania: Biden +5.5

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 50.0%, Trump 44.5%

Last week: Biden 51.0%, Trump 43.8% (Biden +7.2)

Net change: Trump +1.7

Texas: Trump +2.9

USA TODAY average of averages: Trump 48.9%, Biden 46.0%

Last week: Trump 48.8%, Biden 45.8% (Trump +3.0)

Net change: Biden +0.1

Wisconsin: Biden +6.7

USA TODAY average of averages: Biden 50.5%, Trump 43.8%

Last week: Biden 49.9%, Trump 43.6% (Biden +6.3)

Net change: Biden +0.4

Trump on the trail:Donald Trump speaks in Nevada on his current political strategy - attacking Joe Biden



You don't know basic math

 

[Nostra]

its not a theory when the evidence of it sits in front of you,,,

All theories have some kind of evidence. This theory rests on shoddy analysis and bad assumptions, not to mention ignores overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

What evidence to the contrary?

List it colfax_m

 

[colfax_m]

Define "serious person".
Hint: It's not just someone who agrees with your political agenda.

Someone with a record of responsibility and an education or experience that demonstrates knowledge of issues.

 

[progressive hunter]

Define "serious person".
Hint: It's not just someone who agrees with your political agenda.

Someone with a record of responsibility and an education or experience that demonstrates knowledge of issues.

so its not you,,,got it,,

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Fail. NY Times is a liberal partisan hack rag.

 

[j-mac]

Are the people involved in the emails lying when they say its true?

No, but Fox is being less than honest.

So let's review. They contacted someone who is CC'd in an email... and they can remember the exact contents of an email they got 6 years ago? Really?

Which email were they shown? The ones that were kind of routine, or the supposedly 'incriminating' ones.

And they can't name them.

So, I gather now, you don’t believe that Trump called troops “suckers, and losers?”

I don't know if he did or didn't.

Well there's plenty of people saying he didn't...

 

[Billiejeens]

BJ's Pull tweet -

no one should be surprised by the Biden's relationship with the banks, credit card companies, or international oligarchs. what's surprising is the amount of damage control I'm seeing from people who would normally decry this shit

 

[Orangecat]

Someone with a record of responsibility and an education or experience that demonstrates knowledge of issues.

IOW, not you.

 

[colfax_m]

mhmm. Ok.
Why did the dnc refuse to let the fbi or anyone else examine the servers, instead hiring crowd strike?

Because they were in a middle of a presidential campaign and didn’t have time to dismantle their IT infrastructure. What Crowdstrike did was standard practice for large organizations.

 

[WTF19]

Oh please!

the whole October Surprise stinks of rotten eggs!

First, Giuliani has had the laptop since July of 2019....
Why didn't he give it to AG Barr? That is what a law abiding citizen would do.

And Barr is in the bag for Trump, so there would be no reason not to do this...

And then, why in the hell would this computer shop owner, decide to give this lap top to Giuliani.... of all people??? Seriously!!!


Come onnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!


And then you have the impeachment, with Giuliani head deep in the shenanigans back in the late summer and fall of 2019....while he had the laptop already? And didn't come to the defense of Trump, in the impeachment nor the impeachment trial????

come onnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!!!!! wake up!

And then we have the year long investigation in the Senate on it..... and the R Senate investigation in to the Hunter/Joe thingy and they supposedly have the lap top, and then clear Joe Biden of any wrong doing, though lots of negative on Hunter?

and this shop owner is allegedly legally blind so he doesn't know who dropped the laptop off, yet he says he called the person to come pick it up, and another yet, is he claims he saw something disturbing so he gave a copy to the FBI, but when questioned about child porn on the lapto this guy claims "He saw NONE of that..."?

So why did he give the laptop copy to the FBI?

And what was he doing snooping through Hunter Biden's lap top in the first place? That's NOT part of retrieving a hard drive.....? So what was it specifically that made him give a copy to the FBI and then out of the blue, choose Rudy Giuliani to give it to?

And this guy did not see child porn, and is legally blind, additionally an excuse for not knowing who dropped off the laptop, yet he sees well enough to read Hunter's emails and see something to make him want to turn the coPy of the laptop to the FBI?

Then Giuliani holds on to ALL OF THIS INFO, letting the alleged child sex abuse continue on and on and on and on, while he holds on to the laptop for over a year's time, without giving it to AG BARR,

only to drop the laptop in to the new National Enquirer helper for Trump, the New York Post tabloid, to drop the story two weeks out from the election.... and Giuliani says he gave it to the tabloid because he was afraid a legitimate news paper would be required to check the sources BEFORE printing the story,and 'this would be too late'..... too late to serve HIS PURPOSE of an October surprise.....

Come onnnnnnnnnnnn again!

Sorry, this stinks to high heaven of trumpery!

Your timeline is wrong. Want to try to not spin nonsense?

The FBI was given the hard drive in December after they subpoened it---------which means Barr would have or should have been informed then---but the clinton corrupt FBI sat on and hid this evidence even though Trump was being impeached over Burisma and the computer held evidence that was pertinent to the hearing. Guilliani wasn't informed of the computer till this year-------after the FBI had the computer.

Nope! That's all fake news dear one! The shop owner said he gave the laptop to the FBI after Hunter did not show up to pick it up..... that was early summer 2019? so is the story changing?

And then the subpoena that is showing by the GatewayPundit as a subpoena for Hunter Biden to show up at a grand jury, DOES NOT HAVE HUNTER'S NAME ON IT..... whomever was being subpoenaed...the name was blacked out.... the one that is claimed to have some agent named Wilson bled thru on it ....who works on child sex trafficking.....does not name Biden as the person being subpoenaed, and does not say that the person being subpoenaed has to bring any electronic data with him, as claimed by the GatewayPundit......

Snowflakes are being snowed!

So you think the people that confirmed the emails are liars?

What people? Name them...

Your momma, bitch.
You know who i am referring to

No, I don't. And neither do you or you would name names. You're not because you can't.

Of course I cant. Do you think Fox News is making it up? Or do you think the people are lying?

Who knows. Maybe they did. Maybe the emails were "confirmed" by someone falsely claiming to be a recipient. Who knows? You don't.

and you dont know either if it was the other way around.

No I don't. So no one knows if it's true or not yet that doesn't stop you yahoos from spreading it as though it's true.

Two words. Brett Kavanaugh. Hypocrisy 101

Who's hypocritical?

You and your fellow leftists. That is who. You believed Blasey Ford with zero evidence. Here you have more.

Retard, while the Kavanaugh hearing was taking place, I said I didn't believe Ford.

Are you ever not a retard, ShortBus?

Ever??

Link it. If you did, my apologies. Why do you hate kids with special needs?

I don't hate you, I pity you.

As far as those links... apologize, ShortBus...

For one, because then they would have to start the whole process of nominating/confirming all over again and they want someone to take Kennedy’s seat before the election. For another, there’s no proof corroborating the accusations levied against Kavanaugh.

​

And you are not a very good source for verification as your inability to be objective led you astray, wrongly believing I probably believed Ford’s accusation of Kavanaugh.

Pity? because I turned 40? Thank you.

No, because you're a rightard.

better than being a scum demonrat retard

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

mhmm. Ok.
Why did the dnc refuse to let the fbi or anyone else examine the servers, instead hiring crowd strike?

Because they were in a middle of a presidential campaign and didn’t have time to dismantle their IT infrastructure. What Crowdstrike did was standard practice for large organizations.

Didn't have time?!!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

 

[progressive hunter]

mhmm. Ok.
Why did the dnc refuse to let the fbi or anyone else examine the servers, instead hiring crowd strike?

Because they were in a middle of a presidential campaign and didn’t have time to dismantle their IT infrastructure. What Crowdstrike did was standard practice for large organizations.

can you prove that or are you just makin shit up again???

like you did claimng joe and hunter denied the meeting took place???

 

[Billiejeens]

could sit here and point to all the evidence that no one hacked the DNC’s email, that they were in fact downloaded from within, but you don’t care.

You can’t point to any evidence that I can’t debunk now and have done so repeatedly in the past.

I know all about Bill Binney, VIPS and the supposed metadata showing transfer speeds that supposedly exceed bandwidth. It’s all extremely shoddy analysis and I can say why.

mhmm. Ok.
Why did the dnc refuse to let the fbi or anyone else examine the servers, instead hiring crowd strike?

Because it all goes back to hiding Hillary's corruption.

 

[WTF19]

if only you scumbags of the demonrat party had a brain you were allowed to use as your own. imagine what a better AMERICA it would be

 

[colfax_m]

Someone with a record of responsibility and an education or experience that demonstrates knowledge of issues.

IOW, not you.

I have more knowledge about this issue than the vast majority of Americans, I can tell you that much.

 

[WTF19]

Who is this guy? I am shocked Twitter has not banned him.

Yet another right wing conspiracy theorist.

Trump supporters LOVE their nutty conspiracy theories.

Again, are you stupid. Stop responding to my posts if you’re going to be dishonest or I ll blast you on here and tell everyone you’re a Brit interfering in our elections and do so after every single one of your posts on this board. Enough!

What's your evidence he's British?

#1) He would never state where he was from

#2) He oddly Leftist lingo and lack of knowledge about the US when we were discussing looting in cities.

#3) He used the word "dodgy"....Brits use that. I have worked with many.

I am 100% positive he is British.

You're 100% retarded. At least you admit it's from your misguided imagination.

Opinions vary. I am married with children. Of course I am retarded. I am 100% positive he is a Brit. My spidey sense never lets me down. Do you still have that car btw?

No. Eventually, it was no longer worth the maintenence. My wife bought that one for me because I had a white one when we we got married which I traded in for a conversion van when we had our first child.

The emails are authentic. Joe is a crook. You are voting to put a legit traitor in the WHITE HOUSE who is on the take from China. Does that seem smart?

No, it seems like you're a hyperventilating idiot.

and it shows you deflecting, and desperate because your leaders are treasonist asswipes like people have been telling you. you are just to stupid to listen to the TRUTH